![]() |
Approve
Nicely done, I like the black. Now if we could just get black cassettes |
Originally Posted by IBOHUNT
(Post 15436527)
Approve
Nicely done, I like the black. Now if we could just get black cassettes |
Originally Posted by lazerzxr
(Post 15435474)
Are you sure she was talking about the front? CK customer support quoted 65kg max when laced radial for the R45 front hub with 24 hole....
Contrary to the information quoted to you, here is the relevant excerpt from the CK R45 hub owner's manual, the only information provided in writing regarding proper spoke tension on either the front or rear hub: "Radial laced wheels are also more sensitive to over- or under-tensioning, thus proper wheel building practices must be followed. Please follow thespoke manufacturer’s recommended tension specifications when building wheels. Inspect hubs and check spoke tension at regular intervals." This, I think, is in direct contrast to what you were told. Jude's use of 115 kgf for front hubs is consistent with best wheel building practice and consistent with spoke capability. I cannot imagine owning a wheel built to lower tension except in the case of a highly dished rear, when the non-drive side maxes out so much lower than the drive side. If CK R45 hubs cannot tolerate this quite normal 115 kgf spoke tension, they would be disqualified for a quality wheel build in my opinion. Since we know from their widespread use this is not the case, they must, by inference, be able to withstand spoke tension in the range that Jude used. Robert |
Yeah. Just checking my email before leaving for work.
Jude says she set mine to 115kgf in the front and 120kgf in the rear. |
clean look, should work well for ya, 'grats.
|
Originally Posted by garysol1
(Post 15436477)
I doubt that. Running the wide HED rim at 90psi or even a little under offers almost all of the ride quality advantages of a tubeless clincher without the hassles associated with tubeless. The hassles of tubeless I found to be many such as very tough to mount and dismount tires even at home much less on the side of the road when its cold and wet outside. There are very few tubeless tires to choose from. Sealant mess. The biggest disadvantage which happened to me personally and others is that there is very little protection to the brake track of the rim due to the low tubeless pressures. It may be fine on smooth roads but take a hit on a Ohio pothole and instead of a simple pinch flat you get a folded brake track. I have seen this happen a handful of times around here. The second issue may very well be the same on the wider non tubeless rim but so far we have not seen it.
The lower running pressure , I find offers more protection to my rims, I find the tires absorbing rocks, or rough spots in the road mucch more smoothly becuase there is actually some absorption in the tire. The tubeless run forever without flats with the sealant in them. Tubed tires get cut with glass, small metal pieces etc. sealant takes these issues without flats. Just carry a tube with you if you do get a flat. remove the tire and put the tube in and inflate and go. hutch intensives have not been difficult to mount and unmount from the rims. I think the earliest versions of tubeless tires were very difficult, and people assume all are this way. I am riding hutch intensives and they have been out for a while and it appears they have resolved this issue. Tire selection is more limited, but there are several good tires out now. hutch Intensive, Schwalbe Ultremo, Bontrager Trl, and several more. More than enough to choose from. This selection is growing every year. Advantages: Ride is much smoother. I'm talking a very noticeable difference. After riding for 20 years on tubes, I can feel a difference, that makes me never want to go back. They roll quicker. In coasting with friends, I notice that I am always very fast in coasting, even though other aero factors factors are similar with other riders. This fact has been confirmed by many studies from people that are much smarter than me. There is a friction loss of the tire and inner tube interface which causes more riding resistance. Thus the reason tubulars are popular with racers. Don't have to worry about pinch flats as I have had several with tubed tires. Any rim can be run tubeless with stans tape and valves. This makes conversion very easy and inexpensive. I find that the advantages far out weigh the disadvantages. If you tried them several years ago in there infancy, don't dismiss them, they are great and I for one will never go back to tubes. |
Not gonna be able to test ride today :(. Wife had to go into work and i got the kids. But at least I got the new tires on and mounted. I took it for a ride around the block in the neighborhood and am excited to ride them asap.
Anyone know about how long it takes for these hubs to get louder? they are dang near silent right now and i miss that bee's nest in my ear!!!!! I want these things to scream! Took some better shots today after mounting the tires. http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u...r/IMG_2749.jpg http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u...r/IMG_2766.jpg http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u...r/IMG_2758.jpg http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u...r/IMG_2757.jpg http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u...r/IMG_2759.jpg |
that front looks like a ferris wheel, there are so many spokes
|
Are the cages the only carbon weave bits on the bike?
|
yup 24 up front! Being that I'm 175-180, it felt going with a 24/28 would be a better choice than the 20/24 I had with the boyds.
|
Originally Posted by dtrain
(Post 15438817)
Are the cages the only carbon weave bits on the bike?
|
I wish more manufacturers would take a similar subtle approach to branding. Looks nice.
|
Originally Posted by bianchi10
(Post 15438823)
yup 24 up front! Being that I'm 175-180, it felt going with a 24/28 would be a better choice than the 20/24 I had with the boyds.
|
Bianchi, the wheels look great enjoy!
As to the sound, I don't actually think they will get louder, at least mine have not. My understanding is that the new hubs are less loud than previous ones. They still have the angry bee but perhaps not quite as noticeable. Not sure if that's true or not but that's what I've been told. I do know that mine are not nearly as loud as the others I've heard. |
Originally Posted by bianchi10
(Post 15438763)
Anyone know about how long it takes for these hubs to get louder? they are dang near silent right now and i miss that bee's nest in my ear!!!!! I want these things to scream!
|
Originally Posted by bianchi10
(Post 15438829)
yeah :notamused:. Everything else is UD carbon. On the look out for the same cages but in UD.
|
Originally Posted by bianchi10
(Post 15438763)
Can't wait to hear your impressions of the ride. |
just a long valve. Will get shorter ones when I need to get new tubes. Same tubes I used on my boyds. Boyds were a little bit deeper so having a longer stem was easier to use the pump.
|
Originally Posted by bianchi10
(Post 15436554)
Yeah. Just checking my email before leaving for work.
Jude says she set mine to 115kgf in the front and 120kgf in the rear. I ALWAYS listen to the manufacturer in cases like this but on this occasion I dont trust the advice I got. It goes against what I know and what (it appears) industry experts build to. Thats why I asked the question, not to cast doubt on your wheels but to get a number from an experienced source. Originally I built to 90kgf, why? Because front wheels are more lightly loaded than rear for a start and they have better bracing angle from the spokes. Also if you buy DT swiss's flagship 180 hub with ceramic bearings and all the bells and whistles it tells you not to build radial and if you do keep the tension below 100kgf. So 90 seemed reasonable, especially as my hub was previously laced 2x and has some spoke hole marks and scratches from that. The wheel rolls fine with either tension but im thinking now of putting it back to 90kgf so there is some extra "headroom" on the tension. I suspect it would loosen up if it wasnt for the spoke freeze. In my mind 115 seems high, given that the front wheel takes a lot less load than the rear. Hmmm, need to think some more. |
Originally Posted by lazerzxr
(Post 15438934)
Thanks Bianchi, that is interesting.
I ALWAYS listen to the manufacturer in cases like this but on this occasion I dont trust the advice I got. It goes against what I know and what (it appears) industry experts build to. Thats why I asked the question, not to cast doubt on your wheels but to get a number from an experienced source. Originally I built to 90kgf, why? Because front wheels are more lightly loaded than rear for a start and they have better bracing angle from the spokes. Also if you buy DT swiss's flagship 180 hub with ceramic bearings and all the bells and whistles it tells you not to build radial and if you do keep the tension below 100kgf. So 90 seemed reasonable, especially as my hub was previously laced 2x and has some spoke hole marks and scratches from that. The wheel rolls fine with either tension but im thinking now of putting it back to 90kgf so there is some extra "headroom" on the tension. I suspect it would loosen up if it wasnt for the spoke freeze. In my mind 115 seems high, given that the front wheel takes a lot less load than the rear. Hmmm, need to think some more. I am just puzzled that the priciest hubs have the worst limitations on build design and tension. There is something wrong there. Radial is nowadays standard, and the best hubs can't take it at normal tensions? That's not right. Robert |
I don't know anything g about wheel budding, but Jude does. She has built a couple sets in her time so I trust her work.
|
very nice looking wheels bianchi10. I look forward to your ride report, but in the meanwhile, I gotta know
What do they weigh???? |
I didn't get a chance to weigh them before she put my cassette on. When I bring them back to have her put the super spokes on I will weigh before and after.
|
Originally Posted by rangerdavid
(Post 15439063)
very nice looking wheels bianchi10. I look forward to your ride report, but in the meanwhile, I gotta know
What do they weigh???? |
Originally Posted by bianchi10
(Post 15439104)
I didn't get a chance to weigh them before she put my cassette on. When I bring them back to have her put the super spokes on I will weigh before and after.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:58 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.