Garmin / Computer Mounts
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: CT
Bikes: 2010 CAAD9-5, 2013 Supersix Evo
No pictures, but I was a fan with mounting it on the stem for a while. So far this season though, I've had the SRAM out-front type of mount for it, and couldn't be happier. For me its a better placement for readability. Highly recommend it, and I'm even considering getting a second for the beater bike.
#3
Administrator

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,652
Likes: 2,698
From: Delaware shore
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
If it fits on the stem, that's the best place. It's easy to read plus its safer from bumps and getting knocked around. The problem with barflys and others is they easily twist and get knocked out of alignment. But if you can't mount on the stem, any of the others works well.
#4
Thread Killer

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 13,140
Likes: 2,162
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
While it's true the Barfly is easy to twist, I've not found it gets knocked out of alignment. It tends to just sit there. If it does get nudged, such as when I'm cleaning the bike, I just nudge it back into alignment, no biggie.
I like the out-front mounting; from an aesthetics standpoint, I prefer it to stem mount, but also, I think stem mounted computers are too far back for natural viewing (in my riding position) and not 'at hand' for manipulation while riding. I guess it just feels more natural to reach across than it does to reach across and back.
I think the SRAM is the best looking out front mount, what with its elegant lines, but I went Barfly because it was available in white.
I like the out-front mounting; from an aesthetics standpoint, I prefer it to stem mount, but also, I think stem mounted computers are too far back for natural viewing (in my riding position) and not 'at hand' for manipulation while riding. I guess it just feels more natural to reach across than it does to reach across and back.
I think the SRAM is the best looking out front mount, what with its elegant lines, but I went Barfly because it was available in white.
#5
We looked at this and decided that out in front is far better for viewing. SRM and others work this way for a reason.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 629
Likes: 10
From: Greenville, SC
Bikes: Lynskey R230, Gary Fisher Tassajara; Motobecane Boris Fatbike; Cannondale Habit
I have the K-Edge and really like it. Very solidly mounted and won't move if it gets bumped. Pricey, but worth it in my opinion.
#7
No pictures, but I was a fan with mounting it on the stem for a while. So far this season though, I've had the SRAM out-front type of mount for it, and couldn't be happier. For me its a better placement for readability. Highly recommend it, and I'm even considering getting a second for the beater bike.
__________________
George
George
#8
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Milan - Italy
Bikes: Canyon Ultimate CF - NoBrand China frame
i have a garmin out front and happy with it. friend of mine owns a barfly. it is ok but the garmin imho is a better mount
Anyway i think a mount is more or less necessary for racing. When racing in pack it is too dangerous to lower the head and eyes to look the edge on the stem.
I put a second one also on the bike on the indoor trainer
Anyway i think a mount is more or less necessary for racing. When racing in pack it is too dangerous to lower the head and eyes to look the edge on the stem.
I put a second one also on the bike on the indoor trainer
#9
Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
i have a garmin out front and happy with it. friend of mine owns a barfly. it is ok but the garmin imho is a better mount
Anyway i think a mount is more or less necessary for racing. When racing in pack it is too dangerous to lower the head and eyes to look the edge on the stem.
I put a second one also on the bike on the indoor trainer
Anyway i think a mount is more or less necessary for racing. When racing in pack it is too dangerous to lower the head and eyes to look the edge on the stem.
I put a second one also on the bike on the indoor trainer
#10
Thread Killer

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 13,140
Likes: 2,162
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Or go whole hog with the 3T Integra stem:
#14
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,411
Likes: 13
From: Haunchyville
Yeah, I'm good with the extra 5g (and $15 in my pocket).
https://www.bikeradar.com/road/gear/c...mount-13-46967
https://www.bikeradar.com/road/gear/c...ploc-std-46773
https://www.bikeradar.com/road/gear/c...mount-13-46967
https://www.bikeradar.com/road/gear/c...ploc-std-46773
#16
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Milan - Italy
Bikes: Canyon Ultimate CF - NoBrand China frame
yes, i had the same issue. at the end i tilted it up in a way that it does not look really "aero" (not lined up with the stem) but it works very very well, no more reflections on screen, very well readable
#18
Yeah, I'm good with the extra 5g (and $15 in my pocket).
https://www.bikeradar.com/road/gear/c...mount-13-46967
https://www.bikeradar.com/road/gear/c...ploc-std-46773
https://www.bikeradar.com/road/gear/c...mount-13-46967
https://www.bikeradar.com/road/gear/c...ploc-std-46773
#19
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
No pictures, but I was a fan with mounting it on the stem for a while. So far this season though, I've had the SRAM out-front type of mount for it, and couldn't be happier. For me its a better placement for readability. Highly recommend it, and I'm even considering getting a second for the beater bike.
for $20, I can't find anything to complain about other than PROBABLY if I wasn't a SRAM user, I wouldn't like the logo printed on the mount. I've been through some nasty roads and my 810 didn't move one bit. if you can't read it then tilt it. I can't see myself paying more than $20 for a mount.
about the weight: no idea why would people complain about the weight of these mounts (as seen on other threads). take a sip off your bottles and there's 30g> off your bike.
#20
#21
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Essex, Ontario
Bikes: MEC Etape
Another happy SRAM mount user here. The stem mount works just fine but the extensions - SRAM or others - present a much better viewing angle. The SRAM mount has clean lines, is inexpensive and holds my 500 rock solid. The only complaint I've heard about the SRAM mount is that the Garmin does not sit flush with the top of the bars or stem and some people find this aesthetically displeasing.
Cheers!
K
Cheers!
K
#23
Stand and Deliver
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,340
Likes: 1
From: Tampa Bay
Bikes: Cannondale R1000, Giant TCR Advanced, Giant TCR Advanced SL
+1 K-Edge. A bit more pricey, but better quality. Holds securely and puts it just where you want it.
Following is another recent thread discussing the different mounts with some pics. https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...ount-or-Barfly
Following is another recent thread discussing the different mounts with some pics. https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...ount-or-Barfly
#25
Yep, same here. The K-Edge is as solid as solid can be. No noticeable vibrations. I was able to get mine for about $30 on sale on eBay, but when I posted that link merely hours after purchase, the vendor had jacked up the price by $19.






