Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

thoughts on power (newbie)

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

thoughts on power (newbie)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-14, 12:24 PM
  #101  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by achoo
It's not accurate on a non-windy day.
that makes sense, considering it doesn't even ask for bike information.
torque cyclist is offline  
Old 08-14-14, 01:16 PM
  #102  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 2,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IronHorseRiderX
From my personal experience average gym cycle trainer data is junk.
Your MTB efforts should be closer to real (very close in fact) but looking at your strava profile it does not seems like you are anywhere close to 300W.
Well, this segment Mountain Bike Ride Profile | First Group Ride/Road Riding Experience - Easy/Aerobic near Colorado Springs | Times and Records | Strava looks like about 6.7% average grade. Average speed 10.0 mph, on a mountain bike, assuming 70 kg and no wind, power calculator gives me about 290 W. Strava is more generous and estimates 336 W. But, of course, 290 W for 5.5 minutes is not 290 W FTP.
hamster is offline  
Old 08-14-14, 01:19 PM
  #103  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 2,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by torque cyclist
that makes sense, considering it doesn't even ask for bike information.
Yes, it does. Top right corner -> settings -> my gear. It asks about bike type (road/mountain/TT/cross) and weight. Not sure what it does if you never fill this out though.
hamster is offline  
Old 08-14-14, 01:43 PM
  #104  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: https://t.me/pump_upp
Posts: 168

Bikes: Cannondale CAAD 10, Some POS MTB thats way too small

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IronHorseRiderX
From my personal experience average gym cycle trainer data is junk.
This is indeed what I would expect. It might be possible to compared efforts on a specific bike; but obviously the "watts" on a gym trainer need to be taken with a gallon or two of salt.

Originally Posted by IronHorseRiderX
Your MTB efforts should be closer to real (very close in fact) but looking at your strava profile it does not seems like you are anywhere close to 300W.
It's very possible, and being honest, very likely I'm not. That guess comes primarily from a combination of my hard efforts up shorter hills, and my own road climb I've done seems to give something in that vicinity (4.5M climb @ 3.8% @ 12.6 mph on the MTB) trying to guess from online calc. It's worth noting that every ride of mine is on a MTB (at least for a couple more days ) and the vast majority of my rides are on trails because that's what's closest to my house. Lots of gravel, dirt, and sand there.

Originally Posted by IronHorseRiderX
Also going from 70 to 62 kg is like dropping your body fat from 20% to 10% - unless you tried that before you will be very surprised how difficult is that.
That is assuming you are at 20% (or more) body fat right now - on your strava picture you look pretty fit already.
Right now I'm probably around 12-13% BF if I had to guess. Definitely nowhere near showing any sign of abs. Pretty confident about dropping back down to 135-140 as right around there is my normal race weight for running. I've dropped a few times from 145 or so back down to mid/high 130s, so I don't expect too much trouble, but I am coming off a 2 year running injury (groin issue turned hip issue) that had me out till early this year, and my weight up into the 170s. It's a bigger drop than before, but I've done the fairly lean to 6% lean part before and have at least a measure of feel for what works for me.


Originally Posted by IronHorseRiderX
Try to do proper FTP test first - it is free and fun
Any particular protocol you recommend for this? I ask because if I recall correctly I've seen a few different variants.

Last edited by LMaster; 08-14-14 at 01:48 PM.
LMaster is offline  
Old 08-14-14, 02:03 PM
  #105  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: https://t.me/pump_upp
Posts: 168

Bikes: Cannondale CAAD 10, Some POS MTB thats way too small

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hamster
Well, this segment Mountain Bike Ride Profile | First Group Ride/Road Riding Experience - Easy/Aerobic near Colorado Springs | Times and Records | Strava looks like about 6.7% average grade. Average speed 10.0 mph, on a mountain bike, assuming 70 kg and no wind, power calculator gives me about 290 W. Strava is more generous and estimates 336 W. But, of course, 290 W for 5.5 minutes is not 290 W FTP.
I think it's 6.1 or something, not 6.7%

I do get different numbers though even with 6.1. I get speed of 10.14 w/320W using parameters of:

155lb weight
37lb MTB weight
MTB Tire

Admittedly not threshold though. I suspect another 5 minutes of that effort and I would begin to feel like I was really working, and that if I was racing to redline I could hold that effort for somewhere between 15-20 mins if I was willing to go to some dark places.

The only real max effort I have is this one: Mountain Bike Ride Profile | SFT Easy/Aerobic Ride near Monument | Times and Records | Strava - That last .8M climb back to my house was pretty much flat out effort. I sincerely doubt I could have go even another 100m at that point. Of course...that's a 3:30s data point, not sure how well that related to FTP.
LMaster is offline  
Old 08-14-14, 02:24 PM
  #106  
Senior Member
 
TexMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,602

Bikes: Ridley Noah fast, Colnago CLX,Giant Propel Advanced, Pinnerello Gogma 65.1, Specialized S-works Venge, CAADX,Cervelo S3

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by torque cyclist
I will definitely work on being more comfortable with 80-90 rpm "cruise" while probably maintaining the total output 120-170 watts. perhaps once I get that nailed down I will try and use that cadence in a slightly higher gear.
Started at 70-80 rpm last year summer. During winter I rode on a trainer with good rhythm music (175-190 watts), now i'm comfortable at 90-95rpm. Sprinting 150rpm. Make it an interval to spin at 85-90 for 5 minutes, then off, repeat when you ride and soon you'll get to 90rpm.
TexMac is offline  
Old 08-14-14, 02:42 PM
  #107  
Senior Member
 
IronHorseRiderX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LMaster
Right now I'm probably around 12-13% BF if I had to guess. Definitely nowhere near showing any sign of abs. Pretty confident about dropping back down to 135-140 as right around there is my normal race weight for running.
Clearly you are quite fit and with solid background.
Assuming you can get to 62kg and maintain what you have as of now your w/kg will be above 4W/kg for sure.
Which is very impressive if you ask me.

Originally Posted by LMaster
Any particular protocol you recommend for this? I ask because if I recall correctly I've seen a few different variants.
I only did "true FTP" tests - that is rode ~6% 11mi segment every week to see my progress.
It's long and windy enough to cancel most of the wind issues and also since it is over 1h mark I was able to see my true FTP (see my earlier posts in this thread).
I would try this Strava Segment | 2012 Pikes Peak Hill Climb or similar - since I'm not familiar with your area I can not really recommend much.
There's also 20 min test How to Find Your Functional Threshold Power for cycling. Two Test to get started using FTP with assumption that max 20 min effort gives you 95% of your FTP but for me personally it was giving a bit higher numbers (10W higher: my 1h FTP was 256W est and 20min was 280W est which works out to 266W) which is quite common as I learned recently.
Now I'm getting same exact numbers riding with PowerTap so I have all reasons to trust strava estimated numbers.

Thing is if you indeed have ~4W/kg you would end up in top 5 .. 10% on pretty much all popular strava climbing segments - I can almost guarantee that.
Strava is very useful in this regard as it has tons of data and if you look at popular (1000 or more unique riders) climbs you will see that pattern very clearly.
Top 25 riders would be very fit with FTP 5W/kg or more (pro riders and such), top 5% would be around 4 and top 10 just under 4.
But since you ride MTB that equation wan't work for you.
IronHorseRiderX is offline  
Old 08-14-14, 02:58 PM
  #108  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: https://t.me/pump_upp
Posts: 168

Bikes: Cannondale CAAD 10, Some POS MTB thats way too small

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Strava Segment | 2012 Pikes Peak Hill Climb - Once I have a road bike here soon (shopping around for what I want atm), this is on the to do list. Brutal climb though, as it starts at 6,600 and goes up to 14,110ft. Not much air up there

So what you are saying is do it the same way a runner would: all out one hour TT race effort. In running there would be a tendency to stay away from this because the recovery time from a 10M to half marathon race is often several days to a week...but perhaps on the bike this is not an issue. 20 min hammerfest should be easy, there are a good number of nice 15-30 min climbs around here.
LMaster is offline  
Old 08-14-14, 03:32 PM
  #109  
Senior Member
 
IronHorseRiderX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm in no way an expert in this one
Only riding for a year so pretty much a noob.
That 10K ft elevation & thin air is an issue and I do recall seeing formula somewhere to estimate what effect it would have on FTP but if you want to race there you have to take it for what it is
1h max effort is indeed exhausting but for me it is a good thing as I simply do not have much time to train so all my rides include at least 20mins of FTP or above efforts.
Again from my personal observation this is not uncommon and there's number of top local athletes who actually think this is a way to go namely local climbing star Time-crunched Cyclist | English Endurance this What do I do differently from other pro cyclists? | English Endurance , I also know for a fact that number of local clubs do similar rides on a weekly basis (rides with hard 1h+ climbs of 3K+ ft elevation) so it does not bother me to do the same.
Another approach seems to be to include hard 20mins to 30min climbing efforts and do them more often (daily/every other day - depends on your fitness).
There's of course many more training approaches but those above seems to be employed by most top guns I'm following on strava - so they must be good
IronHorseRiderX is offline  
Old 08-14-14, 03:43 PM
  #110  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hamster
Yes, it does. Top right corner -> settings -> my gear. It asks about bike type (road/mountain/TT/cross) and weight. Not sure what it does if you never fill this out though.
forgot about the bike type. I don't think it requires you input your bike. but I made a run on my mtb the other day and had my classic road bike only logged, so I don't know if I can change the bike used after the fact.
torque cyclist is offline  
Old 08-14-14, 03:50 PM
  #111  
Senior Member
 
IronHorseRiderX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by torque cyclist
so I don't know if I can change the bike used after the fact.
Click on your rider there's an edit button on the left bottom side (looks like pen)
IronHorseRiderX is offline  
Old 08-14-14, 05:22 PM
  #112  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IronHorseRiderX
Click on your rider there's an edit button on the left bottom side (looks like pen)
thanks, I did it. I think the estimates make a bit more sense now.
torque cyclist is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CornUponCob
Road Cycling
10
12-14-23 07:47 PM
bikenh
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
13
05-13-15 09:13 AM
Quinn8it
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
48
03-25-14 07:40 PM
bja70
Training & Nutrition
13
01-29-14 08:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.