Physics of Descending
#101
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Don't mistake physics for personal preferences. Heavier riders can play with their tires too, and deflated tires don't actually increase traction... it softens the suspension. Big difference. Traction is governed by normal force and surface material. Full stop.
A bigger rider is less affected by surface irregularities; that is simply a question of increased momentum. A bigger rider certainly can decrease tire pressure; they just have to go to larger tires.
A bigger rider is less affected by surface irregularities; that is simply a question of increased momentum. A bigger rider certainly can decrease tire pressure; they just have to go to larger tires.
#102
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,491
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 970 Post(s)
Liked 1,636 Times
in
1,050 Posts
Love it...
So now here is the second thought. If you make your ride in a loop and return to the same point how much of your ride is either up or down hill?
So now here is the second thought. If you make your ride in a loop and return to the same point how much of your ride is either up or down hill?
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
#103
Senior Member
Elevation gain/loss will be same, but a early short 25%section and a long gradual downhill I suspect would be faster going down the gradual. Time wise for the loop I mean. I dunno..
If there are no apexes in this story then it's no fun, so there.
If there are no apexes in this story then it's no fun, so there.
#104
Senior Member
I'm sure tire choice would make a difference as well
#106
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,559
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times
in
1,470 Posts
The good thing about being a product of the West Virginia school system is I don't understand a word of this. I can't get upset or argue with anyone.
#107
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681
Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
#109
I'm doing it wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875
Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times
in
1,664 Posts
I have an orange bike....it goes down faster. That's a proven fact.
#111
Middle-Aged Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,276
Bikes: Bianchi Infinito CV 2014, TREK HIFI 2011, Argon18 E-116 2013
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just a few weeks ago I had to do my Saturday morning ride alone, because my usual friends were busy doing yard work, and when I got to the top of one of my favorite hills (used to be able to call them climbs before San Francisco) and a ...big... guy had arrived at the top some time before. We both started descending together and I had to put my face in my stem bolts peddling at 100 cadence to keep up with him riding down with elbows locked on the tops looking around casually. He had stock alu wheels and I was sporting by Boyd 60s. My jersey fits nicely and his was on its way to a parachute.
I don't need equations to tell me that weight on the descent makes a substantial difference.
I don't need equations to tell me that weight on the descent makes a substantial difference.
#112
Senior Member
Just a few weeks ago I had to do my Saturday morning ride alone, because my usual friends were busy doing yard work, and when I got to the top of one of my favorite hills (used to be able to call them climbs before San Francisco) and a ...big... guy had arrived at the top some time before. We both started descending together and I had to put my face in my stem bolts peddling at 100 cadence to keep up with him riding down with elbows locked on the tops looking around casually. He had stock alu wheels and I was sporting by Boyd 60s. My jersey fits nicely and his was on its way to a parachute.
I don't need equations to tell me that weight on the descent makes a substantial difference.
I don't need equations to tell me that weight on the descent makes a substantial difference.
#114
Middle-Aged Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,276
Bikes: Bianchi Infinito CV 2014, TREK HIFI 2011, Argon18 E-116 2013
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah, I dig the karma of the uphill. Sometimes though, I end up next to Very large guys at 50+ miles of riding and I am somehow only then passing them on the 4th big climb
#115
Should Be More Popular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,068
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22613 Post(s)
Liked 8,935 Times
in
4,164 Posts
#116
Senior Member
Bicycle Quarterly did wind tunnel tests and at 22 mph going to full aero tuck with no pedaling and the knees tucked into the top tube created a 7 % reduction in drag coefficient. Meaning if your downhill will take you above 22 on coasting alone than don't waste a lot of time and energy spinning a high gear; get small and let mother earth pull you in.
#117
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,425
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 922 Post(s)
Liked 1,158 Times
in
495 Posts
Bicycle Quarterly did wind tunnel tests and at 22 mph going to full aero tuck with no pedaling and the knees tucked into the top tube created a 7 % reduction in drag coefficient. Meaning if your downhill will take you above 22 on coasting alone than don't waste a lot of time and energy spinning a high gear; get small and let mother earth pull you in.
#118
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,744
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5797 Post(s)
Liked 2,614 Times
in
1,451 Posts
Neither right nor wrong, just a perspective.
FWIW reducing wind drag by 7% at 22mph is worth about 1 more mph. Someone who can turn his cranks effectively should be able to do better than that. (if he wants)
FWIW reducing wind drag by 7% at 22mph is worth about 1 more mph. Someone who can turn his cranks effectively should be able to do better than that. (if he wants)
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#119
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Time trialing and optimizing power, it might be a waste to push your speed downhill. But that would imply that you're time trialing with a 22mph top end ...
Seems like a full tuck would be worth more than 7% drag.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CrowSeph
General Cycling Discussion
6
06-30-16 04:34 PM