Katy trail stealth camping
#51
Senior Member
Who's liable for the court costs if the idiot is hurt or killed while using a private bit of land without consent? The owner is likely to face years of crap.
#52
Senior Member
#53
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,517
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times
in
219 Posts
Having said all that, a public trail is a whole different matter. I understand land owners wanting to be more restrictive when there is the potential for much greater use. Such use would lead to a host of potential issues and who needs the headaches. I would be hesitant to buy property abutting a public trail for that reason. Once you transition from 'a guy laying down a bedroll for the night' to 'public use', the rules of accommodation change a great deal in my view. A bike tourist in that setting should be cognizant of the realities of a public trail and stay off private property. Being accommodating to your fellow man goes both ways.
I believe the KATY is remiss in accommodating long distance cyclists. That said, I have ridden a large section of it - 5 nights and stayed in hotels 2 of those. I camped legally the other nights and I didn't find the KATY all that accommodating to camping legally in general. That was 2005. Perhaps things have changed.
I’m certainly not into stealth camping and don’t advocate anyone doing it, but property owners take it too far when they use the mere possibility that someone may stealth camp on private property adjacent to a rail trail as an argument against rail trails in general. As I said earlier, those that make such arguments are greedy, selfish or both. The abandoned ROW is a unique and very valuable resource for everyone, including the landowner, and only in rare circumstances should the property revert back to the original owner.
Last edited by JoeyBike; 12-11-18 at 09:33 AM.
#54
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: SoCal
Posts: 489
Bikes: 2014 Bruce Gordon Rock&Road, 1995 Santana Visa Tandem, 1990 Trek 520, 2012 Surly LHT
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 43 Times
in
35 Posts
You don't need to be "rich" to camp. If you can't even afford to camp then sorry you should not be touring. I don't car if you don't leave a trace. Staying on private property without permission (regardless of local laws) is trespassing and akin to stealing in my book. And if you indeed are breaking the law then you belong in jail. There you get to stay for free.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,905
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,934 Times
in
1,213 Posts
We should all treat stealth camping the same way the vast majority of us treat the posted speed limit. If you have law breaking sensibilities, and you think you can get away with it, the consequences are on you. From what I see on Interstate highways (and other institutions), this is the American way.
#58
Senior Member
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,690
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 418 Times
in
250 Posts
I’d say they lost their property when the railroad went through, and are not getting it back, ever. When was the railroad built? A hundred years ago? The property owners are raising bogus claims of trespassing by stealth camping? Pretty lame argument. It really just comes down to selfish greed.
It's easy to see rights and property as trivial or meaningless when they're someone else's. The guy who stole my bike figured I wasn't using it and he needed one. Why should I get upset?
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
#60
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,517
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times
in
219 Posts
There are many "letter of the law" people in this world. You can't really argue with the fact that trespassing is illegal. And if the whole world practiced what they preached (and this poster may very well be a saint) it would be a better place. I think we all agree that the advice we should be giving is that stealth camping is mostly illegal, and we shouldn't do it. Bike touring has it's implicit challenges however. I have come danged close to being caught out a few times, often due to the campground that was supposed to be there was shut down for one reason or another. Before the days of cellphones, you put in a 100+ mile day against a headwind and find your legal spot does not exist, what are you going to do? I would never have set out on my first tour if I thought camping stealth in an "emergency" would get me executed on the spot.
People who speed in cars take their chances. They have a million ways to justify breaking the law, or give it zero thought. Speeders increase risk on the road for everyone. Strict enforcement does not even seem to help. It is not a great leap to go from wanton lawlessness on the highway by motorists to someone willing to risk a night in a poison ivy patch. It's all illegal, but should not be that difficult to understand the CONCEPT of breaking the law when it hurts no one.
I guess if you found some stranger sleeping in your car it might set you back a minute. I am trying to understand the aversion to occasional harmless "trespassing" myself. I guess this is as close as I can get to that feeling. If some dude(s) were camping for one night on my front lawn without permission I woudn't give a dang, much less under a shrub two miles from my house. Obviously, everyone is not like me and thankfully so. "What If" they get hurt on my property? What if the mailman gets hurt on my property? That guy/gal shows up every day. I have liability insurance.
People who speed in cars take their chances. They have a million ways to justify breaking the law, or give it zero thought. Speeders increase risk on the road for everyone. Strict enforcement does not even seem to help. It is not a great leap to go from wanton lawlessness on the highway by motorists to someone willing to risk a night in a poison ivy patch. It's all illegal, but should not be that difficult to understand the CONCEPT of breaking the law when it hurts no one.
I guess if you found some stranger sleeping in your car it might set you back a minute. I am trying to understand the aversion to occasional harmless "trespassing" myself. I guess this is as close as I can get to that feeling. If some dude(s) were camping for one night on my front lawn without permission I woudn't give a dang, much less under a shrub two miles from my house. Obviously, everyone is not like me and thankfully so. "What If" they get hurt on my property? What if the mailman gets hurt on my property? That guy/gal shows up every day. I have liability insurance.
Last edited by JoeyBike; 12-11-18 at 11:51 AM.
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,690
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 418 Times
in
250 Posts
The "current" attitude? You think private property is a new thing?
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
#62
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,517
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times
in
219 Posts
If someone slept on your front lawn AND stole your bike and spray-painted smiley faces on your garage door, I would be 100% in your corner. Trespassing is not theft or vandalism. It's a whole different set of laws. Mostly designed to prevent theft, poaching, and vandalism.
#63
Senior Member
That's not how it works. The land was taken through eminent domain and owners were paid a fraction of the value, with the agreement that if the railroad ever ceased to function, the land would revert back to the original owners or their successors. You may view it as "selfish greed", but the property owners see it very differently.
It's easy to see rights and property as trivial or meaningless when they're someone else's. The guy who stole my bike figured I wasn't using it and he needed one. Why should I get upset?
It's easy to see rights and property as trivial or meaningless when they're someone else's. The guy who stole my bike figured I wasn't using it and he needed one. Why should I get upset?
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,690
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 418 Times
in
250 Posts
If someone slept on your front lawn AND stole your bike and spray-painted smiley faces on your garage door, I would be 100% in your corner. Trespassing is not theft or vandalism. It's a whole different set of laws. Mostly designed to prevent theft, poaching, and vandalism.
But ultimately, all the considerations come down to one simple concept. The property isn't yours. It belongs to someone else, and they haven't invited you to use it. So don't use it. If you want to use it, ask permission. This isn't complicated.
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,690
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 418 Times
in
250 Posts
Not taken by eminent domain. The RRs obtained an easement with a reversion interest. It’s a complex subject, not easily discussed on a bike forum. The selfish, greedy adjoining landowners want money from the taxpayers, or to hoard the land. Personally, if it was my land, I’d welcome a trail.
Why is it selfish and greedy to want to adhere to the terms of an agreement? Is it conceivable that even one landowner might have legitimate concerns or a different perspective than you?
BB
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
#66
Senior Member
The US Government basically gave land to settlers, then railroads came along, and took over a very small portion of that land, which was in the national interest. Now that things are more built up, it is greedy and selfish to say you need that land for farming. And, frankly, ridiculous.
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,690
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 418 Times
in
250 Posts
The US Government basically gave land to settlers, then railroads came along, and took over a very small portion of that land, which was in the national interest. Now that things are more built up, it is greedy and selfish to say you need that land for farming. And, frankly, ridiculous.
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
#68
Senior Member
I am normally general manager of a property that grows and harvest cherries. Last picking season, I told four foreigners who were camped with about 10 others to leave because they would consistently to turn up to work for half a day, then depart to the campsite. I told them to leave by the same afternoon, and not to came back at all.
Now it seems the owner has decided none of the picking and processing staff are permitted on any of the property outside allocated day-time attendance. Simplifies thing for management, but is based entirely on insurance costs which really aren't wanted for overnight stayers. Also there is noneed to waste labour time in cleaning the rubbish and mess left behind.
Shame I will miss out the experience season as I still recover from a near fatal workplace series of injuries last March. But the guy acting in my position is fully clued up on it all.
And just an indicator, three of the top five pickers we've had in five seasons arrived on bicycles in my first season there.
#69
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,517
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times
in
219 Posts
I have lost tens of thousands of dollars over the years to trespassers who have vandalized my farm, stolen equipment from my farm, damaged crops, interfered with equipment, created safety hazards, etc. People have used my farm for a variety of criminal activities. Many, if not most rural landowners can tell similar tales. YOU may only intend to pitch a tent and roll out in the roll out in the morning, but I can't tell that just from looking at you. None of that even addresses privacy, liability, or hazards you may not be aware of.
I can't argue with you because you are right. I also know that a savvy stealth camper could come and go from a carefully chosen location and no one would ever know.
Last edited by JoeyBike; 12-11-18 at 03:30 PM.
#70
Senior Member
You could even argue that having a rail trail through your property would be better from a security standpoint. Thieves and vandals don’t want witnesses.
#71
Senior Member
The first paragraph answers. Thanks.
I am normally general manager of a property that grows and harvest cherries. Last picking season, I told four foreigners who were camped with about 10 others to leave because they would consistently to turn up to work for half a day, then depart to the campsite. I told them to leave by the same afternoon, and not to came back at all.
Now it seems the owner has decided none of the picking and processing staff are permitted on any of the property outside allocated day-time attendance. Simplifies thing for management, but is based entirely on insurance costs which really aren't wanted for overnight stayers. Also there is noneed to waste labour time in cleaning the rubbish and mess left behind.
Shame I will miss out the experience season as I still recover from a near fatal workplace series of injuries last March. But the guy acting in my position is fully clued up on it all.
And just an indicator, three of the top five pickers we've had in five seasons arrived on bicycles in my first season there.
I am normally general manager of a property that grows and harvest cherries. Last picking season, I told four foreigners who were camped with about 10 others to leave because they would consistently to turn up to work for half a day, then depart to the campsite. I told them to leave by the same afternoon, and not to came back at all.
Now it seems the owner has decided none of the picking and processing staff are permitted on any of the property outside allocated day-time attendance. Simplifies thing for management, but is based entirely on insurance costs which really aren't wanted for overnight stayers. Also there is noneed to waste labour time in cleaning the rubbish and mess left behind.
Shame I will miss out the experience season as I still recover from a near fatal workplace series of injuries last March. But the guy acting in my position is fully clued up on it all.
And just an indicator, three of the top five pickers we've had in five seasons arrived on bicycles in my first season there.
#72
Senior Member
Who's going to see anyone committing theft in a distance from a passing trail in the dark (or even daylight)?
Have ever lived in a remote country environment? I have; it ain't easy keeping up a 24 watch.
Anyone "visiting" by using access roads where I work now is intercepted, and told to leave immediately under supervision. Easy trespassers off boats walking on the land are intercepted and told to leave, without any excuse.
And remember that people committing crimes are often carrying loaded weapons. Just do a thread check of BFs to see does it when riding bikes.
Do the properties owned privately along the K Trail, pay local and/or state government taxes?
#73
Senior Member
#74
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,690
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 418 Times
in
250 Posts
Do you imagine that even one of these crimes could be attributed to bicycle tourists? Speaking for myself, my load is big enough out there cycling self contained for months on end. Unless I came across a solid gold brick at the edge of your property, or paper money blowing down the road, I would not want to carry so much as an extra matchstick.
Glad we agree. I'll note that just because you can do a thing doesn't mean you should do a thing. I'll even add that if you ask nicely, you're more than welcome to camp on the farm.
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
#75
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,690
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 672 Post(s)
Liked 418 Times
in
250 Posts
Yes, you could argue that, but the folks who have had problems with people using the trail to get in and out of otherwise remote locations have a completely different argument to make. I suppose leaving all your windows and doors open would make your house less vulnerable to thieves as well, right?
__________________
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton
Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton