Chain tension inconsistent
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Bikes: Capo
Chain tension inconsistent
I know that cranks aren't perfectly round and as the crank turns the tension on the chain changes but it seems like on my bike that the change is considerable. When the drive side arm is parallel to the ground and pointing towards the front of the bike, the chain tension is good. When the same arm points to the rear the chain sags almost an inch. Is this much of a difference normal or is something up?
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Stevens Point/Milwaukee, WI
#6
Raving looney
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, ON, Canada
Bikes: 70s Leader Precision w/Shimano 600 (road), IRO Rob Roy (Fixed)
#8
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Bikes: Capo
#9
cab horn

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 28,353
Likes: 30
From: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
I know that cranks aren't perfectly round and as the crank turns the tension on the chain changes but it seems like on my bike that the change is considerable. When the drive side arm is parallel to the ground and pointing towards the front of the bike, the chain tension is good. When the same arm points to the rear the chain sags almost an inch. Is this much of a difference normal or is something up?
#11
Prefers Cicero

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,860
Likes: 146
From: Toronto
Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
For those who don't click the link, Biopace chain rings are slightly oval, to try to even out power distribution around the pedal stroke. If you look down as you ride you will see the front of the chainring seem to move forward and back with each stroke.
#13
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Bikes: Capo
#16
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Bikes: Capo
I thought about that but like na975 posted above, the chainring and spider are machined to fit perfectly. There is no wiggle room. If something is off, no matter what position it's at it will be the same.
#20
#22
Prefers Cicero

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,860
Likes: 146
From: Toronto
Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
#23
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Bikes: Capo
I hope my Phil Wood hub wasn't poorly built. I'll check the links to see if there is a stiff one. I also try rotation the chainring to see if that does anything.
#24
While you have your chainring off, use a compass to go around the half of the chainring with the arm forward (the half that the chain is engaged on). Then do the same with the arm facing back. A lesser number will tell you that the ring is the problem.
I had thought about using a diameter measurement, but it doesn't seem to work right in my head. I think an arc measurement would be better. If you can't measure the arc properly (get a length figure), then do the longer one first (arm forward) and attempt to 'overlay' the same arc with the loose side (arm backward) - if they're not on top of each other, or even close, you know it's the ring.
I had thought about using a diameter measurement, but it doesn't seem to work right in my head. I think an arc measurement would be better. If you can't measure the arc properly (get a length figure), then do the longer one first (arm forward) and attempt to 'overlay' the same arc with the loose side (arm backward) - if they're not on top of each other, or even close, you know it's the ring.
__________________
saddle sores bike club | prepare to be rode
saddle sores bike club | prepare to be rode




