Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Frame sizing question, Leader 722ts specific.

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Frame sizing question, Leader 722ts specific.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-10 | 11:18 PM
  #1  
DisplayERROR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: California

Bikes: Merckx Corsa Extra (7-11 2007), Leader 722ts, Windsor The Hour

Frame sizing question, Leader 722ts specific.

I recently bought a Leader 722ts 53cm. After putting on my 700c velocity Deep V's I realized that there is absolutely no clearance from the top tube to my crotch area, and this is whithout the tires on. Is the frame too big for me, because it certainly feels that way. I have an inseam of about 29-30", so would a size 51cm be more appropriate? here are the measurements of the 722ts pulled from leaders site.


Effective Head Head Stand-
Frame Wheel seat tube B.B Top Tube Front- Rear- over
Size Size tube angle Drop Tube Length center center Height
angle
51cm 510 700c 75.5° 71.5° 55 530 95 583 390 725
53cm 530 700c 75.0° 72.0° 55 535 110 588 390 744
DisplayERROR is offline  
Reply
Old 06-12-10 | 11:21 PM
  #2  
poppawheelie
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: Victoria / Gifu

Bikes: Panasonic, Super Cycle

syandover height doesnt reallly matter. tt is more important but if its too high for you it could be too big. You should get fitted at your lbs.
milkcratebasket is offline  
Reply
Old 06-12-10 | 11:34 PM
  #3  
DisplayERROR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: California

Bikes: Merckx Corsa Extra (7-11 2007), Leader 722ts, Windsor The Hour

I did do a fitting at my LBS and they said that the 53cm would be appropriate for my height of 5'7". I inquired about a 51cm because I felt that it would be a more comfortable frame in terms of fit, but the LBS guy told me that a 51cm would be for people 5'4" ish. I'm aware that your overall height really is not that important but the inseam I guess is a bit too close still.
DisplayERROR is offline  
Reply
Old 06-12-10 | 11:38 PM
  #4  
poppawheelie
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: Victoria / Gifu

Bikes: Panasonic, Super Cycle

Did you get fitted on that frame or did they just say "order a 53?" I meant bring your frame there and get them to set it up with you.
milkcratebasket is offline  
Reply
Old 06-12-10 | 11:44 PM
  #5  
AEO's Avatar
AEO
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,257
Likes: 5
From: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

there's no tangible difference between 53cm and 51cm, because 700c wheeled bikes basically don't get any smaller in sizes below 21"

don't worry about the stand over.
When are you going to be straddling the top tube and walking on your feet when you're riding your bike anyways?

the only time where you might want a 51cm is when there is too much seat tube height and the seat post hits the frame before you can actually get the saddle in a position where it's comfortable.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-10 | 06:25 AM
  #6  
bleedingapple's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: Leader 722TS, Surly Cross Check, GT Outpost, Haro Z16, Trek 1000

+1 to all of this. when you say fitted by the LBS, do you mean full work up or did they just measure your inseam and tell you a bike that fits?
bleedingapple is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-10 | 07:00 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Honestly, I think you should stick with the 53cm frame. Even without too much clearance in the standover height, it probably fits you otherwise. I ride a 53 and I am also 5'7". If it's any incentive, it will be easier to sell a 53 than a 51 in the near future (maybe, this could be told BS, but it seems that 53's are always out of stock before 51's).

But.. If you want to know for sure the 'correct fit' I would take the frame and your wheels (hopefully you've got tires and tubes somewhere ) to a LBS and have them fit you.
leed is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-10 | 10:44 AM
  #8  
Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
im 5'6 as well and everybody told me to get a 53cm even though i wanted a 51cm. I ended up getting a 53cm. i also have a 30" inseam and i barely clear the standover but the top tube suits my upper body better and it was a more comfortable ride

Last edited by TeddyVarious; 06-13-10 at 01:20 PM.
TeddyVarious is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-10 | 11:24 AM
  #9  
TejanoTrackie's Avatar
Veteran Racer
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,854
Likes: 913
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas

Bikes: 34 frames + 80 wheels

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that standover should NEVER be the determining factor in choosing a frame size. The important thing is that the complete bicycle, including frame, bar, stem, saddle position, crank arm length as an assemblage fit YOU properly when RIDING the bicycle. As long as the correct relative position of the three human contact points (hands, feet, derriere) can be achieved with available components, then that particular frame will work for YOU.
__________________
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

Originally Posted by Dcv
I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
TejanoTrackie is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-10 | 11:28 AM
  #10  
MysticRats's Avatar
aNYthing
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: Concrete Jungle NYC
I have a 51cm 722TS.
Im 5'5 29/30" inseam.
The 51cm is perfect for me tho it looks more like a 49cm.
I feel like I could fit on a 53 and not have such a tiny lookin bike

I think yur standover is not a problem at all.
More important is yur cockpit fit (Stem length bar reach n drop and saddle height)
Tho a slammed seat kinda looks goofy.
MysticRats is offline  
Reply
Old 06-13-10 | 08:30 PM
  #11  
DisplayERROR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: California

Bikes: Merckx Corsa Extra (7-11 2007), Leader 722ts, Windsor The Hour

Thanks a lot guys. The reason I asked is because I will be using RB021 drop bullhorns which require a bit more reach than typical bullhorns and upon a vague assessment of mounting the seat post to a tireless frame with wheels, I felt that I couldn't adjust the seat all that high. Since I bought the frame from Leaders online retail store which I believe is located 2 hours away from where I live, would you think that I could have the bike fitted and if its not a good size, send the frame back for exchange?
DisplayERROR is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
okiride
Road Cycling
12
12-09-14 08:16 AM
rhlee
Fitting Your Bike
19
01-12-14 07:14 AM
spectastic
Commuting
23
08-14-12 08:00 AM
CZSteve
Road Cycling
3
11-12-10 04:46 PM
hurricane_dave
Commuting
5
06-22-10 07:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.