Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

singlespeed chain tension

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

singlespeed chain tension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-10 | 02:53 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 535
Likes: 5
singlespeed chain tension

what kind of chain tension should one be running with a single speed? Not fixed, freewheel.

There isn't much information around the internet about this, or at least when I search I always come up with fixed gear chain tension results.

I kinda figured a tad looser than if I were running fixed would be fine. But seen a few singlespeed videos on youtube and their chain is flapping around like crazy.

Thanks.
diff is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 02:58 PM
  #2  
jim-bob's Avatar
hateful little monkey
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,274
Likes: 0
From: oakland, ca
Just tight enough to not drop the chain.
Once you go slack, you never go back.
jim-bob is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 04:34 PM
  #3  
jdgesus's Avatar
sɹɐʇsɟoןןnɟsʇıbɟɯo
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,986
Likes: 0
From: seattle, too many links

Bikes: fixed gear recumbent trike

1/2" of play up/down

i've run it even more slack fine tho.
had the chain jump once but my chainline was shîté
__________________
Originally Posted by yummygooey
crabon/campy/rapha/roadie-bro.

next step is recumbent.




my bikes | bike blog | beer blog | work 1 | work 2
jdgesus is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 05:08 PM
  #4  
FastJake's Avatar
Constant tinkerer
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 8,040
Likes: 156
From: Madison, WI
Loose enough so that it doesn't bind. If you're dropping your chain, it's too loose, or your chainline isn't straight.
FastJake is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 06:37 PM
  #5  
peach-picker's Avatar
packing shed cassanova
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: can be found with the traffic in the streets of fresno ca.

Bikes: 07 bianchi pista, 09 mercier kilo tt, 09 masi speciale fixed LTD, late 80s masi nuova strada, full campy gruppo, 89 centurion accordo, 88 peugeot versallies, 93 faggin 14 speed full shimano 105

i think the can tension should be about the same as when you are riding fixed, on my bikes i have very very little play, if any without binding, of course it is a big process when i tension my chain. I HATE CHAIN SLACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peach-picker is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-10 | 07:10 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 535
Likes: 5
Googling bmx chain tension brings up more results. Some people are saying they like a 1/2" of "sag" in their chain. Actually one guy said that.

The consensus seems to be 1/2" total up and down movement.

Another good one someone said is if you throw your cranks backwards and it freewheels for at least 1 rev before stopping you are good. If it stops before, it's too tight.

Thanks. Guess I will tighten it up a tad.
diff is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-10 | 12:23 AM
  #7  
evilcryalotmore's Avatar
モㄥ工匕モ 爪モ爪乃モ尺
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
From: LA San Gabriel, California

Bikes: Custom frame

so tight that it cant spin.

My single speed mountain bike has a derailer because im lazy:|
evilcryalotmore is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-10 | 12:46 AM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 535
Likes: 5
What do you mean so tight it cannot spin? Can you elaborate a bit please?

I have noticed a few things -

Flipping the bike upside down and spinning the crank - looser chain will start to pull the crank around, tighter chain won't (the crank will just stand still and freewheel).

Same goes when walking the bike, the pedals will turn. Of course only until my clip/strap hits the ground, then it will start to freewheel.
diff is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-10 | 03:12 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 535
Likes: 5
So I realized how bad off center my chainring was. Spent like an hour trying to center it. Got it pretty much perfect, go to tighten it for good and one of the bolts was giving me an issue, kept spinning, go grab my chainring wrench (which is a pos invention btw) and the back part pretty much tears in half. Ugh, now I have to ride with 4 bolts until tomorrow. Hope the LBS has one. At least the back part should be standard sized I hope.

Last edited by diff; 12-06-10 at 03:15 AM.
diff is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-10 | 03:29 AM
  #10  
dsh's Avatar
dsh
Oh, you know...
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
From: DC

Bikes: '74 Schwinn Sports Tourer (Polo), S-Works E5 Team Festina (Chorus 11), Trek 2200 Bonded Carbon (Fixed), Trek 920 (7 speed IGH), Chesini Olimpiade SL (1x7)

To answer your original question:

dsh is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-10 | 01:31 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, Canada

Bikes: Brodie Force w/ Xtracycle, Dahon Helios, Merida Folding, Pacific Carryme, Softride Classic

Thanks DSH, that is helpful.
puppypilgrim is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-10 | 06:55 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 535
Likes: 5
Damn, that is pretty loose.

I think I'm already bored of single speed anyway.
diff is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-10 | 07:01 PM
  #13  
Capocaccia's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by diff
Damn, that is pretty loose.

I think I'm already bored of single speed anyway.
No, single speed is bored of you.
Capocaccia is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-10 | 07:18 PM
  #14  
hairnet's Avatar
Fresh Garbage
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,190
Likes: 30
From: Los Angeles

Bikes: N+1

I rode SS and tried to shift
hairnet is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-10 | 07:18 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 535
Likes: 5
Wouldn't doubt it, probably is. I am a boring individual.
diff is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-10 | 09:10 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 188
Likes: 1

...
scruggle is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-10 | 11:12 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Forgive my ignorance, but why would a ss chain need to be any loser than a fg chain (outside of a dropped chain being potentially more devastating on a fg)?
oneeyedhobbit is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-10 | 11:18 PM
  #18  
Capocaccia's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
it doesnt?
Capocaccia is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-10 | 11:22 PM
  #19  
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 27,266
Likes: 152
From: YEG

Bikes: See my sig...

A good rule is a half inch of sag... a too tight chain will slow you down by putting a lot of stress on your drive train as the chain will try and pull the chain ring and cog closer together... this is what happens when a chain binds.

You don't want that.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Reply
Old 12-06-10 | 11:25 PM
  #20  
TejanoTrackie's Avatar
Veteran Racer
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,854
Likes: 913
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas

Bikes: 34 frames + 80 wheels

Originally Posted by oneeyedhobbit
Forgive my ignorance, but why would a ss chain need to be any loser than a fg chain (outside of a dropped chain being potentially more devastating on a fg)?
It's not that is has to be looser, it's just that it can be looser, and it's not as critical that a precise tension be achieved. Basically, as long as the chain isn't running tight at any point and isn't flopping around wildly, it's ok. I just set up all my bikes, both FG and SS, pretty much the same with about 1/2 total up/down slack at the tightest point.
__________________
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

Originally Posted by Dcv
I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
TejanoTrackie is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-10 | 12:09 AM
  #21  
dsh's Avatar
dsh
Oh, you know...
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
From: DC

Bikes: '74 Schwinn Sports Tourer (Polo), S-Works E5 Team Festina (Chorus 11), Trek 2200 Bonded Carbon (Fixed), Trek 920 (7 speed IGH), Chesini Olimpiade SL (1x7)

Originally Posted by oneeyedhobbit
Forgive my ignorance, but why would a ss chain need to be any loser than a fg chain (outside of a dropped chain being potentially more devastating on a fg)?
Like TT said, it's not that it has to be, it's that it can be.

On a fixed gear the likelihood of your chain dropping is greatly increased by the tension constantly switching back and forth between the "top" section of chain (when you're accelerating) and the "bottom" section of chain (when you're resisting/skidding). The slack constantly flipping locations can lead to the chain bouncing around a lot more, and increases the likelihood it will grab the side of a tooth and jump off the cog/ring.

That's not an issue with a freewheel, so you can run a little bit more slack if you prefer.

I would never dream of running fixed with the amount of slack I posted above.
dsh is offline  
Reply
Old 12-07-10 | 11:04 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
So what kind of rules of thumb are in place for fixed gear tension? I used to run my tension probably a bit too loose (maybe a cm of play up and down?), til someone at a LBS told me otherwise. Now I crank the wheel back and there is very little play, but I'd like to avoid binding and the associated drive train wear/loss of efficiency.
oneeyedhobbit is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jambon
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
7
09-25-15 12:33 PM
dynikus
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
26
10-18-12 12:06 PM
SinX7
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
33
10-16-12 07:05 PM
jpsawyer
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
9
05-27-11 08:25 AM
Adam Clark
Bicycle Mechanics
7
06-12-10 10:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.