Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

crankset for touring?

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

crankset for touring?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-10, 11:32 AM
  #26  
ah.... sure.
 
kayakdiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Whidbey Island WA
Posts: 4,107

Bikes: Specialized.... schwinn..... enough to fill my needs..

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Cyclesafe
In my experience, the Ultegra 10 speed FD is too long to work acceptably with a "touring" crankset. I haven't tried a Tiagra 10 speed FD, but I would have my doubts. The XT FD doesn't work with the Ultegra 10 speed shifters either.

https://sheldonbrown.com/harris/derailers-front.html

I haven't heard whether the IRD Alpina-d front der works with the Ultegra 10 speed. If so, then the new 10 speed MTB cassettes would

indeed give tourers new (modern?) STI options.
I run tiagra fd when using a mountain/trekking crank. I believe you are spot on about running ultegra with a mountain crank cycle safe. I was just pointing out that it can be done and that it can work well if done with the right combination of parts.
kayakdiver is offline  
Old 10-12-10, 11:48 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,435

Bikes: IF steel deluxe 29er tourer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
KD: Was your Tiagra FD purchased when Tiagra was 9 speed or is it a new one made when it was meant to be paired with Tiagra 10 speed shifters? "The right combination of parts" is the issue avoided when sticking to a pure MTB drivetrain.
Cyclesafe is offline  
Old 10-12-10, 11:54 AM
  #28  
ah.... sure.
 
kayakdiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Whidbey Island WA
Posts: 4,107

Bikes: Specialized.... schwinn..... enough to fill my needs..

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Cyclesafe
KD: Was your Tiagra FD purchased when Tiagra was 9 speed or is it a new one made when it was meant to be paired with Tiagra 10 speed shifters? "The right combination of parts" is the issue avoided when sticking to a pure MTB drivetrain.
It's 9 speed
kayakdiver is offline  
Old 10-12-10, 03:30 PM
  #29  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,369

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6222 Post(s)
Liked 4,222 Times in 2,368 Posts
Originally Posted by Garthr
Too old? C'mon Anybody with a lick of sense can maintain a tapered crank. You can get a better 45mm chainline with the Sugino too, 50mm kinda sucks for a road bike. If you need lower than a 24/34 or 36, I won't say it.......

If the OP wants to go even less expensive, he can get a Stronglight Impact triple for about half of the Sugino. https://www.chainreactioncycles.com/S...=impact+triple
And anybody with a lick of sense can see that the Shimano system is far superior to a 3 piece crankset. There are no crank bolts to work loose if not properly torqued. If something does come loose, it takes a 5 mm allen wrench to fix it. And the Shimano doesn't cost that much more than the Sugino.

Too much is made out of chainlines. I run 135mm hubs on my touring bike. Most touring bikes are going to use the same hub width which is the same width as a mountain bike. With the exception of one road bike every thing I own runs mountain bike cranks and I've never noticed any kind of problems with shifting or chain wear.

What won't you say about needing a lower than 24 tooth inner? I have no problem with using the smallest inner chainring I can get. I even run a 20 tooth inner on my touring bike. Got a problem with that?
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 10-12-10, 03:34 PM
  #30  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,369

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6222 Post(s)
Liked 4,222 Times in 2,368 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob
Now that the cassettes are 11 or 12-32or34 You don't need a big big chainring , its overkill.
and so a 44,32,22 Mtb crank will do, Bar end shifters work on drop bar type, nicely.
A 44/11 really isn't that tall. It's only 108 gear inch. Even my tiny wife spins out a 44/11 pretty quickly. A 46/11 or 48/11 gives a much better range.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 10-12-10, 04:39 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,435

Bikes: IF steel deluxe 29er tourer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cyccommute
A 44/11 really isn't that tall. It's only 108 gear inch. Even my tiny wife spins out a 44/11 pretty quickly. A 46/11 or 48/11 gives a much better range.
Well, at 90rpm, 32mm tires, and a 175mm crankarm a 44/11 gets you 28.9 mph, a 46/11 gets you 30.2 mph, and a 48/11 gets you 31.5 mph. All speeds reached only while descending. Any benefit of the taller combination would be fleeting at best.

In fact, I think the new 2x10 MTB setups (42/28 or 39/26) with a 12-36 10 speed cassette could be of interest to many tourers. It would be nice to get rid of that pesky triple front der.
Cyclesafe is offline  
Old 10-12-10, 05:13 PM
  #32  
ah.... sure.
 
kayakdiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Whidbey Island WA
Posts: 4,107

Bikes: Specialized.... schwinn..... enough to fill my needs..

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Cyclesafe
Well, at 90rpm, 32mm tires, and a 175mm crankarm a 44/11 gets you 28.9 mph, a 46/11 gets you 30.2 mph, and a 48/11 gets you 31.5 mph. All speeds reached only while descending. Any benefit of the taller combination would be fleeting at best.

In fact, I think the new 2x10 MTB setups (42/28 or 39/26) with a 12-36 10 speed cassette could be of interest to many tourers. It would be nice to get rid of that pesky triple front der.
I'd love to go to the new double someday.... Have a hard time convincing myself of that after just spending a wad of cash on a new Giant TCR SL . So for now........
kayakdiver is offline  
Old 10-13-10, 08:59 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
robow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,873
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 599 Post(s)
Liked 284 Times in 195 Posts
Originally Posted by Cyclesafe
Well, at 90rpm, 32mm tires, and a 175mm crankarm a 44/11 gets you 28.9 mph, a 46/11 gets you 30.2 mph, and a 48/11 gets you 31.5 mph. All speeds reached only while descending. Any benefit of the taller combination would be fleeting at best.
You beat me to it. Was just going to say that if your wife can spin out @ 30 mph while loaded with 25 lbs or more of gear attached and she's not descending, and can do it for a sustained effort, she should turn pro.
robow is offline  
Old 10-13-10, 11:07 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by robow
You beat me to it. Was just going to say that if your wife can spin out @ 30 mph while loaded with 25 lbs or more of gear attached and she's not descending, and can do it for a sustained effort, she should turn pro.
It all depends on whether you must keep up with anybody.

If you come off a hill onto a flat, you can turn a big gear to keep your momentum going for a mile or two. Back when my only bike was a mountain bike, I had to pedal like mad to keep up with my friends with road bikes in those cases. If you don't need to keep up with anybody, that substantially reduces the need for big gears. And it's never a bad thing to have a 22x34 if you can swing it.

For the record, I have an XT 48-36-26 crankset on my touring bike.
ploeg is offline  
Old 10-13-10, 03:33 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Right where I'm supposed to be
Posts: 1,634

Bikes: Franklin Frames Custom, Rivendell Bombadil

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 117 Post(s)
Liked 209 Times in 127 Posts
Originally Posted by cyccommute
And anybody with a lick of sense can see that the Shimano system is far superior to a 3 piece crankset. There are no crank bolts to work loose if not properly torqued. If something does come loose, it takes a 5 mm allen wrench to fix it. And the Shimano doesn't cost that much more than the Sugino.
The bolts that hold the arms on OBB cranks can come loose too, and some people have their arms also fall off. Nothing is foolproof. Far superior? Sorry, I disagree in every way.
Garthr is offline  
Old 10-13-10, 03:44 PM
  #36  
Life is a fun ride
 
safariofthemind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 643
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A little perspective: for years and years and years people toured on old style square BB cranks, cottered cranks and what not; things coming loose is exceedingly rare and has always been. A little Loctite is cheap insurance, but I'd say that's mostly a non issue IMO.
safariofthemind is offline  
Old 10-13-10, 04:36 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
clasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 2,737
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 148 Times in 103 Posts
Originally Posted by Cyclesafe
Well, at 90rpm, 32mm tires, and a 175mm crankarm a 44/11 gets you 28.9 mph, a 46/11 gets you 30.2 mph, and a 48/11 gets you 31.5 mph. All speeds reached only while descending. Any benefit of the taller combination would be fleeting at best.

In fact, I think the new 2x10 MTB setups (42/28 or 39/26) with a 12-36 10 speed cassette could be of interest to many tourers. It would be nice to get rid of that pesky triple front der.
If you can spare a couple of gears, they have 9 speed versions of the 12-36 cassette too, and I think one could manage that with a 38-48 front, or 36 if you can. I'm going to go this route with a drop-bar hybrid next year.... I should add that it's running that black deore FD with the mega-range just for this reason.

Last edited by clasher; 10-13-10 at 04:40 PM.
clasher is offline  
Old 10-13-10, 04:49 PM
  #38  
Life is a fun ride
 
safariofthemind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 643
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by clasher
If you can spare a couple of gears, they have 9 speed versions of the 12-36 cassette too, and I think one could manage that with a 38-48 front, or 36 if you can. I'm going to go this route with a drop-bar hybrid next year.... I should add that it's running that black deore FD with the mega-range just for this reason.
Isn't that too high at the bottom end? Of course I'm just an old dude, but still.
safariofthemind is offline  
Old 10-13-10, 04:58 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
clasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 2,737
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 148 Times in 103 Posts
Originally Posted by safariofthemind
Isn't that too high at the bottom end? Of course I'm just an old dude, but still.
I wouldn't take this bike to the Rockies, but I think it's enough for me and my light gear in the rolling hills of the Great Lakes... and I was one of those plucky 20km a day commuters before I got laid off.
clasher is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OregonHepcat
Touring
32
04-25-19 01:57 PM
Cheers4Gears
Touring
41
06-17-12 12:56 AM
Mithrandir
Touring
29
10-26-11 10:57 AM
divtag
Bicycle Mechanics
5
08-14-10 10:34 AM
seenoweevil
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
26
03-14-10 12:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.