Low Carb Diet - Biking?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,092
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As the keto diets were originally popularized by bodybuilders with high protein needs for musclebuilding I too am concerned with non weight trainers consuming extremely high protein levels and even they when on these diets can consume too much if used for energy rather than musclebuilding.I personally believe protein levels should be only enough for musclebuilding and general body maintenence needs and no more or you will run into problems longterm.In fact that is my whole philosophy most whole foods are healthy as long as being utilized as intended but too much or too little can cause problems particularly over the long term.P.S. One thing I find interesting though is cholesterol and triglyeride levels seem to improve inspite of the high saturated fat levels.
Last edited by RWTD; 04-07-03 at 06:01 AM.
#27
Clipless Crash Clutz
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
RWTD... running with the devil? backpack..he he
Yeah, I am shying away from high fat meats - and sticking to chix, fish, pork.. but I'm into week three and find I don't have as much energy for exercise, let alone doing laundry and going from basement to second floor. Legs are weary.
I think the best thing this diet does is wean one from the sugar and processed carbs.
Yeah, I am shying away from high fat meats - and sticking to chix, fish, pork.. but I'm into week three and find I don't have as much energy for exercise, let alone doing laundry and going from basement to second floor. Legs are weary.
I think the best thing this diet does is wean one from the sugar and processed carbs.
#28
On yer' left
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: On my bike
Posts: 173
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally posted by cbhungry
This may be due to the fact that most people do not follow his recommendations of adequate hydration and supplementation, but we don't really know since there are no double blinded placebo controlled trials that would confirm this.
This may be due to the fact that most people do not follow his recommendations of adequate hydration and supplementation, but we don't really know since there are no double blinded placebo controlled trials that would confirm this.
DURHAM, N.C. – The high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet popularized by Dr. Robert Atkins has been the subject of heated debate in medical circles for three decades. Now, preliminary research findings at Duke University Medical Center show that a low-carbohydrate diet can indeed lead to significant and sustained weight loss.
https://www.lowcarb.ca/articlesb/article343.html
For more info on this study, do a Google search using the words "atkins diet duke university"
Peace,
Lou
__________________
No Crybabies!!!
No Crybabies!!!
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,092
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bbmoozer Now what does your name refer too? Also just to nitpick a little pork is not a particularly lean meat and a lean cut of beef such as top round would actually probably be better.Free range bison would be even better yet and might not be so hard to find in Wisc.
#30
Jungle lady
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 871
Bikes: gary fisher cake
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 178 Post(s)
Liked 233 Times
in
98 Posts
“While we’re impressed with the weight loss of this diet, we still are not sure about the safety of it,” Westman said. “More studies need to be done in order to be confident about the long-term safety of this type of diet.”
This is a direct quote from the study which was referenced.
I would not base the safety of the Atkins diet on this study (It's efficacy in weight loss has never been debated) but this was a flawed study for the following reasons:
Number one, it was funded completely by the Atkins center for complementary medicine so there may be some bias for reporting only on the data that supports the program and ignoring the ones that don't. (research bias)
Number two, subjects studied was 51. Over half did not exercise so to extrapolate this study to cyclists or other athletes would be bad. Not to mention 10 dropped out of the study but it gave no reason (ie: did they have kidney stones,etc.) 51 people is not a large enough clinical trial to make firm decisons about the safety of this program.
Number three, they did not take the same population cohort and give them another diet to follow and compare this to the Atkins regimine. Many people's behavior change when they are participating in any clincial trial ie: so was the weight loss due to the atkin's diet only or did particpating in the clinical trial affect results? (This is called particpant bias) This has been a common error in clinical research.
Number 4, they checked cholesterol after six months on the diet, but previous case reports show initial lowering of cholesterol with eventual rise after 6 mos
Number 5, no urinanalysis for proteinuria (protein in urine) was monitored which is one of the concerns with this diet (the development of abnormal proteins in the urine suggesting kidney damage.)
I think Dr. Westman was up front about the limitations of this study. We will see what future ones show.
This is a direct quote from the study which was referenced.
I would not base the safety of the Atkins diet on this study (It's efficacy in weight loss has never been debated) but this was a flawed study for the following reasons:
Number one, it was funded completely by the Atkins center for complementary medicine so there may be some bias for reporting only on the data that supports the program and ignoring the ones that don't. (research bias)
Number two, subjects studied was 51. Over half did not exercise so to extrapolate this study to cyclists or other athletes would be bad. Not to mention 10 dropped out of the study but it gave no reason (ie: did they have kidney stones,etc.) 51 people is not a large enough clinical trial to make firm decisons about the safety of this program.
Number three, they did not take the same population cohort and give them another diet to follow and compare this to the Atkins regimine. Many people's behavior change when they are participating in any clincial trial ie: so was the weight loss due to the atkin's diet only or did particpating in the clinical trial affect results? (This is called particpant bias) This has been a common error in clinical research.
Number 4, they checked cholesterol after six months on the diet, but previous case reports show initial lowering of cholesterol with eventual rise after 6 mos
Number 5, no urinanalysis for proteinuria (protein in urine) was monitored which is one of the concerns with this diet (the development of abnormal proteins in the urine suggesting kidney damage.)
I think Dr. Westman was up front about the limitations of this study. We will see what future ones show.
__________________
Ride forever, work whenever.
XX power
Eat more mud, mountain bike 'till you die!
https://www.pnhp.org/
Ride forever, work whenever.
XX power
Eat more mud, mountain bike 'till you die!
https://www.pnhp.org/
Last edited by cbhungry; 04-07-03 at 11:31 AM.
#31
On yer' left
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: On my bike
Posts: 173
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Dang, cbhungry, you are way smart! Thanks for a good analysis of the study.
Since the diet worked for me, I have my own research bias
I rationalize it this way. The potential damage the diet may do is outweighed by the proven damage that obesity does do. Also, although I still limit carbs, I don't come anywhere close to the Atkins recommended levels anymore. My thing is long distance riding and I just have to have a some carbs to fuel that passion.
Thanks again,
Lou
Since the diet worked for me, I have my own research bias
I rationalize it this way. The potential damage the diet may do is outweighed by the proven damage that obesity does do. Also, although I still limit carbs, I don't come anywhere close to the Atkins recommended levels anymore. My thing is long distance riding and I just have to have a some carbs to fuel that passion.
Thanks again,
Lou
__________________
No Crybabies!!!
No Crybabies!!!
#32
Jungle lady
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 871
Bikes: gary fisher cake
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 178 Post(s)
Liked 233 Times
in
98 Posts
You'r right, obesity is the second most preventable cause of death in this country. The Atkin's diet just may not be for everyone (esp. those with history of kidney stones or kidney damage already) but I certainly have seen success stories myself when it comes to weight loss.
__________________
Ride forever, work whenever.
XX power
Eat more mud, mountain bike 'till you die!
https://www.pnhp.org/
Ride forever, work whenever.
XX power
Eat more mud, mountain bike 'till you die!
https://www.pnhp.org/
#33
Clipless Crash Clutz
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally posted by RWTD
Bbmoozer Now what does your name refer too? Also just to nitpick a little pork is not a particularly lean meat and a lean cut of beef such as top round would actually probably be better.Free range bison would be even better yet and might not be so hard to find in Wisc.
Bbmoozer Now what does your name refer too? Also just to nitpick a little pork is not a particularly lean meat and a lean cut of beef such as top round would actually probably be better.Free range bison would be even better yet and might not be so hard to find in Wisc.
Pork...ain't that the 'other white meat'?
bbmoozer..it's my cat. He's colored like a holstein cow - thus moozer and is cool like bb king.