Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > "The 33"-Road Bike Racing
Reload this Page >

Training Status??? (IV)

Search
Notices
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

Training Status??? (IV)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-17, 11:01 AM
  #7526  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Finally tried Zwift. All it took was buying an Eero so wifi would reach the garage, buying a 4iiii HRM so my Quarq would talk to my iPad. Oh yeah, and getting a new iPad.

It was actually pretty cool.
caloso is offline  
Old 01-20-17, 11:02 AM
  #7527  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aaronmcd
Nope. For same gear, same cadence, longer cranks will have same power. More leverage means less force but more distance, same torque. Force x distance = torque or energy. Energy per rotation x rpm = power.

Cadence in a gear dictates speed of the rear wheel. One can't simply put on longer cranks, turn the same gear at the same cadence and get more power out of it.
ok, so you're adding speed into it, which is fine.

gear ratio depends only on # of teeth on the chainring & # of teeth on the cogs (although distance covered/speed will vary based on wheel/tire size, pressure).

but what we're talking about here is keeping the same force and cadence.

typically, when people make a crank arm length change, they adjust cadence up or down and force on the pedals decreases or increases to match (i.e. power is the same).

in the hypothetical above, if the muscles are firing at the same speed and with the same force, longer cranks will make for an effectively larger gear (analogy); the bike will go faster/further.

you wrote that @Ygduf's cadence hadn't changed (i didn't look); i was just citing that if what you said is true, it would definitely explain an increase in power, all else equal.

if you want to hold power constant, then cadence/force will change, and speed/distance will stay the same.

gears and gear ratio have a very specific mechanical meaning, which is why i said "effectively" earlier.
tetonrider is offline  
Old 01-20-17, 11:59 AM
  #7528  
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Ygduf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978

Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by tetonrider
ok, so you're adding speed into it, which is fine.

gear ratio depends only on # of teeth on the chainring & # of teeth on the cogs (although distance covered/speed will vary based on wheel/tire size, pressure).

but what we're talking about here is keeping the same force and cadence.

typically, when people make a crank arm length change, they adjust cadence up or down and force on the pedals decreases or increases to match (i.e. power is the same).

in the hypothetical above, if the muscles are firing at the same speed and with the same force, longer cranks will make for an effectively larger gear (analogy); the bike will go faster/further.

you wrote that @Ygduf's cadence hadn't changed (i didn't look); i was just citing that if what you said is true, it would definitely explain an increase in power, all else equal.

if you want to hold power constant, then cadence/force will change, and speed/distance will stay the same.

gears and gear ratio have a very specific mechanical meaning, which is why i said "effectively" earlier.
these are trainer rides on a KK, so wheel revolutions/minute are basically a function of power, hence the very-early-morning computation of gear ratios * cadence.

Anyway, pm slope should not have changed when changing the crank arms. calibrated offset didn't change, but I definitely didn't hang weights and take it that seriously.

Biggest change is my knee-to-spindle position now with the additional 1cm - (tiny bit forward from dropping saddle 1cm) and the pads effectively coming up 1cm as well.

If this rain ever ****ing stops I'll go outside and then I'll have a better idea if it's all placebo or pm drift or whatever.
Ygduf is offline  
Old 01-20-17, 12:36 PM
  #7529  
Senior Member
 
TexMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,602

Bikes: Ridley Noah fast, Colnago CLX,Giant Propel Advanced, Pinnerello Gogma 65.1, Specialized S-works Venge, CAADX,Cervelo S3

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
1x7 then a flat, hop on bike and another flat.
TexMac is offline  
Old 01-20-17, 12:46 PM
  #7530  
OMC
 
revchuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 6,960

Bikes: Specialized Allez Sprint, Look 585, Specialized Allez Comp Race

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 461 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times in 49 Posts
Sounds like a reverse Midas touch - everything you touch turns to ****. Same wheels from the wreck last weekend?
__________________
Regards,
Chuck

Demain, on roule!
revchuck is offline  
Old 01-20-17, 04:27 PM
  #7531  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 2,200

Bikes: 2017 Raleigh RX 1.0, 2018 Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 471 Post(s)
Liked 632 Times in 337 Posts
came home a bit early to fit in a ride since I haven;t done anything since tuesday. did a zwift workout, sweet spot consisting of 2 30min blocks with alternating 5mins @ 95% and 5min at 85%. The tougher part was because of my gearing either spinning too slowly or too quickly for my personal pref.
hubcyclist is offline  
Old 01-20-17, 06:19 PM
  #7532  
OMC
 
revchuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 6,960

Bikes: Specialized Allez Sprint, Look 585, Specialized Allez Comp Race

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 461 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times in 49 Posts
Originally Posted by hubcyclist
came home a bit early to fit in a ride since I haven;t done anything since tuesday. did a zwift workout, sweet spot consisting of 2 30min blocks with alternating 5mins @ 95% and 5min at 85%. The tougher part was because of my gearing either spinning too slowly or too quickly for my personal pref.
My solution for this is an 11 speed 12-25 cassette (ten speed 12-23 works the same way). With a compact crankset, 50-19 gives about 18.5 mph and there's a one-tooth difference out to the 12t cog. That translates to about a five rpm change for most of it. Makes it easier to stay with your preferred cadence.
__________________
Regards,
Chuck

Demain, on roule!
revchuck is offline  
Old 01-20-17, 06:43 PM
  #7533  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 2,200

Bikes: 2017 Raleigh RX 1.0, 2018 Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 471 Post(s)
Liked 632 Times in 337 Posts
Originally Posted by revchuck
My solution for this is an 11 speed 12-25 cassette (ten speed 12-23 works the same way). With a compact crankset, 50-19 gives about 18.5 mph and there's a one-tooth difference out to the 12t cog. That translates to about a five rpm change for most of it. Makes it easier to stay with your preferred cadence.
I have 8 speed so that's the bigger problem lol
hubcyclist is offline  
Old 01-20-17, 06:50 PM
  #7534  
OMC
 
revchuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 6,960

Bikes: Specialized Allez Sprint, Look 585, Specialized Allez Comp Race

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 461 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times in 49 Posts
In that case, you're well and truly screwed!
__________________
Regards,
Chuck

Demain, on roule!
revchuck is offline  
Old 01-20-17, 08:48 PM
  #7535  
Nonsense
 
TheKillerPenguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,918

Bikes: Affirmative

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 880 Post(s)
Liked 541 Times in 237 Posts
4 yesterday with 1x15 of a flat ground ftp test that I punked out on because I was like "this is going way too good, oh god am I going to hard? I must be going too hard this hurts. It's supposed to hurt though. I don't want to hurt." and I mentally cracked. Then I did 3x20 tempo to complete a workout. Until I got skittish the number was yuge and on par with my last uphill climbing test which was nice.

Today was 5hrs z2 doing some aero skill building (practicing IAB, riding in the drops for a couple of hours, etc). Tomorrow is the same. Sunday is prolly 5-6 with the first 4 or so hangin with bikebros.

20+hr base weeks into perpetuity! I should get some hobbies.

Last edited by TheKillerPenguin; 01-20-17 at 08:52 PM.
TheKillerPenguin is offline  
Old 01-20-17, 08:50 PM
  #7536  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tariffville, CT
Posts: 15,405

Bikes: Tsunami road bikes, Dolan DF4 track

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 102 Posts
Originally Posted by Ygduf
these are trainer rides on a KK, so wheel revolutions/minute are basically a function of power, hence the very-early-morning computation of gear ratios * cadence.

Anyway, pm slope should not have changed when changing the crank arms. calibrated offset didn't change, but I definitely didn't hang weights and take it that seriously.

Biggest change is my knee-to-spindle position now with the additional 1cm - (tiny bit forward from dropping saddle 1cm) and the pads effectively coming up 1cm as well.

If this rain ever ****ing stops I'll go outside and then I'll have a better idea if it's all placebo or pm drift or whatever.
What you want to calculate is pedal speed, meaning how far the pedals are going. With similar rpm but with longer cranks your pedals will be going further. It looks like it's a leverage thing as you're making less power for a given amount of pedal movement.



However, having said that, I can sustain better power on longer cranks than on shorter ones. I tried really hard twice for full seasons and once for 6 months to move to shorter cranks because "aero" but when I got out in the races I was struggling just to hang in. I'm weaker so I think I'm much closer to the cusp of getting shelled, probably exacerbates the delta, but still, longer cranks are so much easier. Acclimatization period for my last 170->175 change was one day, and I spent 6 months on the 170s prior to that. I spent basically a year on the 170s twice before, and immediately felt much better when I went to 175s.
Attached Images
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson

Last edited by carpediemracing; 01-20-17 at 08:54 PM.
carpediemracing is offline  
Old 01-21-17, 02:23 AM
  #7537  
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Ygduf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978

Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Mmm. Pedal speed indicator. If only there were a device that measured torque and cadence and calculated work from that information.

A few years ago I'd get annoyed that you all literally have no idea what you're talking about and are telling me what's up about something that I already know about.

(Except TR, and his "check the slope" argument, which is tautology and never not wrong, but therefore slightly irritating in a different vein)

Instead I'll ride outside and see if it fits. As long as it's steady, idgaf, really. TT bike is so far under road threshold that if it adds 10tss to workouts once or twice a week, over the course of 40 days my CTL will be inflated by 3 points which still doesn't matter because no race result has ever had my CTL listed on the USAC page.

Y'all worry too much.

Last edited by Ygduf; 01-21-17 at 02:30 AM.
Ygduf is offline  
Old 01-21-17, 11:58 AM
  #7538  
Senior Member
 
Wylde06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 2,208

Bikes: Cannondale Six13

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 21 Posts
I rode my bike today outside. It was pretty awesome.
Wylde06 is offline  
Old 01-21-17, 05:51 PM
  #7539  
Senior Member
 
aaronmcd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 3,462

Bikes: Cervelo S5, Marin Gestalt X11

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 554 Post(s)
Liked 65 Times in 45 Posts
Rain held off. Climbed Mt Tam twice, 2x50+ @90%.
Cuz I think it's gonna be pouring tomorrow.
5:17 325 TSS
aaronmcd is offline  
Old 01-21-17, 06:00 PM
  #7540  
Nonsense
 
TheKillerPenguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,918

Bikes: Affirmative

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 880 Post(s)
Liked 541 Times in 237 Posts
Mt Tam is pretty (i've only ridden it once). I'm jealous!
TheKillerPenguin is offline  
Old 01-21-17, 06:19 PM
  #7541  
Senior Member
 
wktmeow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 703

Bikes: CAAD 10

Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 277 Post(s)
Liked 229 Times in 111 Posts
Rode a group ride with Tmonk until I flatted. He was nice enough to wait up for me. Felt pretty good and even put in a couple of mini attacks, then towed a couple of juniors around in the wind. Legs felt great after the Swami's bit, was able to sit at threshold into a cross headwind for a good while.

Also got stung by a bee

4 hours 265ish tss

Last edited by wktmeow; 01-21-17 at 07:50 PM.
wktmeow is offline  
Old 01-21-17, 07:27 PM
  #7542  
Senior Member
 
hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 3,888
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Ygduf
Mmm. Pedal speed indicator. If only there were a device that measured torque and cadence and calculated work from that information.

A few years ago I'd get annoyed that you all literally have no idea what you're talking about and are telling me what's up about something that I already know about.

(Except TR, and his "check the slope" argument, which is tautology and never not wrong, but therefore slightly irritating in a different vein)

Instead I'll ride outside and see if it fits. As long as it's steady, idgaf, really. TT bike is so far under road threshold that if it adds 10tss to workouts once or twice a week, over the course of 40 days my CTL will be inflated by 3 points which still doesn't matter because no race result has ever had my CTL listed on the USAC page.

Y'all worry too much.
pretty much that
hack is offline  
Old 01-21-17, 07:42 PM
  #7543  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444

Bikes: bikes

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times in 711 Posts
Went out and rode 3 hours at 300w yesterday. That's up from 2:17 last week. Last 30 minutes were death. Works out to about 90% ftp. Don't think I'll be doing it again anytime soon.

90 mile group ride today and cracked 1500w for the first time. Ended up with 850 tss for this week. Happy with all of these nice numbers.
rubiksoval is offline  
Old 01-21-17, 07:49 PM
  #7544  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ygduf
Anyway, pm slope should not have changed when changing the crank arms. calibrated offset didn't change, but I definitely didn't hang weights and take it that seriously.
"should not have changed."

true in theory, not so in practice. that manufacturer's PM is sensitive to ring changes.

in my direct experience, slope is susceptible to change when anything on those units is changed -- ring, arms, bolt type (SS or alu), or even torque changes on bolts with the same rings.

you certainly don't have to care about it, but this is a discussion forum. i don't care whether your power is correct or not, but declaring it 'all good' without verifying is simply not possible. those kinds of statements get read and passed on.

this is NOT true for all spiders, but it has been true for all generations of Quarqs that I have seen.

(and, yes, they needed software to specifically correct for ring and temperature changes because it's not handled directly by hardware; arm changes are incredibly rare, so it's not that the unit is unaffected -- it's just that it doesn't come up often enough.)

still, as i said before, if cadence was the same with longer arms, that would explain higher power. hell, maybe you are even stronger than the #s indicate, but it was masked by a slope change that corresponds to lower power.
tetonrider is offline  
Old 01-21-17, 08:49 PM
  #7545  
Senior Member
 
Wylde06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 2,208

Bikes: Cannondale Six13

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 21 Posts
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
Went out and rode 3 hours at 300w yesterday.
I did that today.

For 6 minutes.

Wylde06 is offline  
Old 01-21-17, 10:14 PM
  #7546  
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Ygduf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978

Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by tetonrider
"should not have changed."

true in theory, not so in practice. that manufacturer's PM is sensitive to ring changes.
didn't touch the rings tho
Ygduf is offline  
Old 01-21-17, 10:30 PM
  #7547  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ygduf
didn't touch the rings tho
point = missed.
tetonrider is offline  
Old 01-22-17, 03:11 PM
  #7548  
Nonsense
 
TheKillerPenguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,918

Bikes: Affirmative

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 880 Post(s)
Liked 541 Times in 237 Posts
4hrs with globecanvas and 3 others at a mostly civil pace. Tried out some aero stuff on some pulls, and attacked a climb 1hr in and 3.75hrs in to see how legs would respond after the previous 3 day's volume (4, 5, 5). The watts are there and I feel sluggish but OK, which is good because it means I'm not in race shape and there will be gains to be had once build starts. I bugged out on the last 1.5hrs of the ride (I was going to ride home from the finish) but I didn't feel like being lost in my thoughts and called it a day.

~21hrs. 950 TSS. Feel like a slacker (seriously. i have issues.) Last week was 21.5hrs @ 950TSS or so. Next week I'd like to aim for 24ish hours, which is what I wanted this week, but life gets in the way sometimes. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

The last time I checked my CTL was 3 weeks ago and it was 104. So I'm going to guess my CTL is higher than 104 at this point.
TheKillerPenguin is offline  
Old 01-22-17, 03:34 PM
  #7549  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 2,200

Bikes: 2017 Raleigh RX 1.0, 2018 Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 471 Post(s)
Liked 632 Times in 337 Posts
2.5hrs on zwift @ 80%, trying not to be bitter that I didn't get to ride outside in 50 degree weather yesterday
hubcyclist is offline  
Old 01-22-17, 03:52 PM
  #7550  
Killing Rabbits
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,697
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 217 Times in 102 Posts
Originally Posted by TheKillerPenguin
Next week I'd like to aim for 24ish hours
"I ride one day per week."
Enthalpic is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.