Training Status??? (IV)
#7526
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Finally tried Zwift. All it took was buying an Eero so wifi would reach the garage, buying a 4iiii HRM so my Quarq would talk to my iPad. Oh yeah, and getting a new iPad.
It was actually pretty cool.
It was actually pretty cool.
#7527
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nope. For same gear, same cadence, longer cranks will have same power. More leverage means less force but more distance, same torque. Force x distance = torque or energy. Energy per rotation x rpm = power.
Cadence in a gear dictates speed of the rear wheel. One can't simply put on longer cranks, turn the same gear at the same cadence and get more power out of it.
Cadence in a gear dictates speed of the rear wheel. One can't simply put on longer cranks, turn the same gear at the same cadence and get more power out of it.
gear ratio depends only on # of teeth on the chainring & # of teeth on the cogs (although distance covered/speed will vary based on wheel/tire size, pressure).
but what we're talking about here is keeping the same force and cadence.
typically, when people make a crank arm length change, they adjust cadence up or down and force on the pedals decreases or increases to match (i.e. power is the same).
in the hypothetical above, if the muscles are firing at the same speed and with the same force, longer cranks will make for an effectively larger gear (analogy); the bike will go faster/further.
you wrote that @Ygduf's cadence hadn't changed (i didn't look); i was just citing that if what you said is true, it would definitely explain an increase in power, all else equal.
if you want to hold power constant, then cadence/force will change, and speed/distance will stay the same.
gears and gear ratio have a very specific mechanical meaning, which is why i said "effectively" earlier.
#7528
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
ok, so you're adding speed into it, which is fine.
gear ratio depends only on # of teeth on the chainring & # of teeth on the cogs (although distance covered/speed will vary based on wheel/tire size, pressure).
but what we're talking about here is keeping the same force and cadence.
typically, when people make a crank arm length change, they adjust cadence up or down and force on the pedals decreases or increases to match (i.e. power is the same).
in the hypothetical above, if the muscles are firing at the same speed and with the same force, longer cranks will make for an effectively larger gear (analogy); the bike will go faster/further.
you wrote that @Ygduf's cadence hadn't changed (i didn't look); i was just citing that if what you said is true, it would definitely explain an increase in power, all else equal.
if you want to hold power constant, then cadence/force will change, and speed/distance will stay the same.
gears and gear ratio have a very specific mechanical meaning, which is why i said "effectively" earlier.
gear ratio depends only on # of teeth on the chainring & # of teeth on the cogs (although distance covered/speed will vary based on wheel/tire size, pressure).
but what we're talking about here is keeping the same force and cadence.
typically, when people make a crank arm length change, they adjust cadence up or down and force on the pedals decreases or increases to match (i.e. power is the same).
in the hypothetical above, if the muscles are firing at the same speed and with the same force, longer cranks will make for an effectively larger gear (analogy); the bike will go faster/further.
you wrote that @Ygduf's cadence hadn't changed (i didn't look); i was just citing that if what you said is true, it would definitely explain an increase in power, all else equal.
if you want to hold power constant, then cadence/force will change, and speed/distance will stay the same.
gears and gear ratio have a very specific mechanical meaning, which is why i said "effectively" earlier.
Anyway, pm slope should not have changed when changing the crank arms. calibrated offset didn't change, but I definitely didn't hang weights and take it that seriously.
Biggest change is my knee-to-spindle position now with the additional 1cm - (tiny bit forward from dropping saddle 1cm) and the pads effectively coming up 1cm as well.
If this rain ever ****ing stops I'll go outside and then I'll have a better idea if it's all placebo or pm drift or whatever.
#7529
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,602
Bikes: Ridley Noah fast, Colnago CLX,Giant Propel Advanced, Pinnerello Gogma 65.1, Specialized S-works Venge, CAADX,Cervelo S3
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
1x7 then a flat, hop on bike and another flat.
#7530
OMC
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 6,960
Bikes: Specialized Allez Sprint, Look 585, Specialized Allez Comp Race
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 461 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
49 Posts
Sounds like a reverse Midas touch - everything you touch turns to ****. Same wheels from the wreck last weekend?
__________________
Regards,
Chuck
Demain, on roule!
Regards,
Chuck
Demain, on roule!
#7531
Senior Member
came home a bit early to fit in a ride since I haven;t done anything since tuesday. did a zwift workout, sweet spot consisting of 2 30min blocks with alternating 5mins @ 95% and 5min at 85%. The tougher part was because of my gearing either spinning too slowly or too quickly for my personal pref.
#7532
OMC
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 6,960
Bikes: Specialized Allez Sprint, Look 585, Specialized Allez Comp Race
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 461 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
49 Posts
came home a bit early to fit in a ride since I haven;t done anything since tuesday. did a zwift workout, sweet spot consisting of 2 30min blocks with alternating 5mins @ 95% and 5min at 85%. The tougher part was because of my gearing either spinning too slowly or too quickly for my personal pref.
__________________
Regards,
Chuck
Demain, on roule!
Regards,
Chuck
Demain, on roule!
#7533
Senior Member
My solution for this is an 11 speed 12-25 cassette (ten speed 12-23 works the same way). With a compact crankset, 50-19 gives about 18.5 mph and there's a one-tooth difference out to the 12t cog. That translates to about a five rpm change for most of it. Makes it easier to stay with your preferred cadence.
#7534
OMC
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 6,960
Bikes: Specialized Allez Sprint, Look 585, Specialized Allez Comp Race
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 461 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
49 Posts
In that case, you're well and truly screwed!
__________________
Regards,
Chuck
Demain, on roule!
Regards,
Chuck
Demain, on roule!
#7535
Nonsense
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,918
Bikes: Affirmative
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 880 Post(s)
Liked 541 Times
in
237 Posts
4 yesterday with 1x15 of a flat ground ftp test that I punked out on because I was like "this is going way too good, oh god am I going to hard? I must be going too hard this hurts. It's supposed to hurt though. I don't want to hurt." and I mentally cracked. Then I did 3x20 tempo to complete a workout. Until I got skittish the number was yuge and on par with my last uphill climbing test which was nice.
Today was 5hrs z2 doing some aero skill building (practicing IAB, riding in the drops for a couple of hours, etc). Tomorrow is the same. Sunday is prolly 5-6 with the first 4 or so hangin with bikebros.
20+hr base weeks into perpetuity! I should get some hobbies.
Today was 5hrs z2 doing some aero skill building (practicing IAB, riding in the drops for a couple of hours, etc). Tomorrow is the same. Sunday is prolly 5-6 with the first 4 or so hangin with bikebros.
20+hr base weeks into perpetuity! I should get some hobbies.
Last edited by TheKillerPenguin; 01-20-17 at 08:52 PM.
#7536
Senior Member
these are trainer rides on a KK, so wheel revolutions/minute are basically a function of power, hence the very-early-morning computation of gear ratios * cadence.
Anyway, pm slope should not have changed when changing the crank arms. calibrated offset didn't change, but I definitely didn't hang weights and take it that seriously.
Biggest change is my knee-to-spindle position now with the additional 1cm - (tiny bit forward from dropping saddle 1cm) and the pads effectively coming up 1cm as well.
If this rain ever ****ing stops I'll go outside and then I'll have a better idea if it's all placebo or pm drift or whatever.
Anyway, pm slope should not have changed when changing the crank arms. calibrated offset didn't change, but I definitely didn't hang weights and take it that seriously.
Biggest change is my knee-to-spindle position now with the additional 1cm - (tiny bit forward from dropping saddle 1cm) and the pads effectively coming up 1cm as well.
If this rain ever ****ing stops I'll go outside and then I'll have a better idea if it's all placebo or pm drift or whatever.
However, having said that, I can sustain better power on longer cranks than on shorter ones. I tried really hard twice for full seasons and once for 6 months to move to shorter cranks because "aero" but when I got out in the races I was struggling just to hang in. I'm weaker so I think I'm much closer to the cusp of getting shelled, probably exacerbates the delta, but still, longer cranks are so much easier. Acclimatization period for my last 170->175 change was one day, and I spent 6 months on the 170s prior to that. I spent basically a year on the 170s twice before, and immediately felt much better when I went to 175s.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
Last edited by carpediemracing; 01-20-17 at 08:54 PM.
#7537
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Mmm. Pedal speed indicator. If only there were a device that measured torque and cadence and calculated work from that information.
A few years ago I'd get annoyed that you all literally have no idea what you're talking about and are telling me what's up about something that I already know about.
(Except TR, and his "check the slope" argument, which is tautology and never not wrong, but therefore slightly irritating in a different vein)
Instead I'll ride outside and see if it fits. As long as it's steady, idgaf, really. TT bike is so far under road threshold that if it adds 10tss to workouts once or twice a week, over the course of 40 days my CTL will be inflated by 3 points which still doesn't matter because no race result has ever had my CTL listed on the USAC page.
Y'all worry too much.
A few years ago I'd get annoyed that you all literally have no idea what you're talking about and are telling me what's up about something that I already know about.
(Except TR, and his "check the slope" argument, which is tautology and never not wrong, but therefore slightly irritating in a different vein)
Instead I'll ride outside and see if it fits. As long as it's steady, idgaf, really. TT bike is so far under road threshold that if it adds 10tss to workouts once or twice a week, over the course of 40 days my CTL will be inflated by 3 points which still doesn't matter because no race result has ever had my CTL listed on the USAC page.
Y'all worry too much.
Last edited by Ygduf; 01-21-17 at 02:30 AM.
#7539
Senior Member
Rain held off. Climbed Mt Tam twice, 2x50+ @90%.
Cuz I think it's gonna be pouring tomorrow.
5:17 325 TSS
Cuz I think it's gonna be pouring tomorrow.
5:17 325 TSS
#7541
Senior Member
Rode a group ride with Tmonk until I flatted. He was nice enough to wait up for me. Felt pretty good and even put in a couple of mini attacks, then towed a couple of juniors around in the wind. Legs felt great after the Swami's bit, was able to sit at threshold into a cross headwind for a good while.
Also got stung by a bee
4 hours 265ish tss
Also got stung by a bee
4 hours 265ish tss
Last edited by wktmeow; 01-21-17 at 07:50 PM.
#7542
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 3,888
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Mmm. Pedal speed indicator. If only there were a device that measured torque and cadence and calculated work from that information.
A few years ago I'd get annoyed that you all literally have no idea what you're talking about and are telling me what's up about something that I already know about.
(Except TR, and his "check the slope" argument, which is tautology and never not wrong, but therefore slightly irritating in a different vein)
Instead I'll ride outside and see if it fits. As long as it's steady, idgaf, really. TT bike is so far under road threshold that if it adds 10tss to workouts once or twice a week, over the course of 40 days my CTL will be inflated by 3 points which still doesn't matter because no race result has ever had my CTL listed on the USAC page.
Y'all worry too much.
A few years ago I'd get annoyed that you all literally have no idea what you're talking about and are telling me what's up about something that I already know about.
(Except TR, and his "check the slope" argument, which is tautology and never not wrong, but therefore slightly irritating in a different vein)
Instead I'll ride outside and see if it fits. As long as it's steady, idgaf, really. TT bike is so far under road threshold that if it adds 10tss to workouts once or twice a week, over the course of 40 days my CTL will be inflated by 3 points which still doesn't matter because no race result has ever had my CTL listed on the USAC page.
Y'all worry too much.
#7543
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Went out and rode 3 hours at 300w yesterday. That's up from 2:17 last week. Last 30 minutes were death. Works out to about 90% ftp. Don't think I'll be doing it again anytime soon.
90 mile group ride today and cracked 1500w for the first time. Ended up with 850 tss for this week. Happy with all of these nice numbers.
90 mile group ride today and cracked 1500w for the first time. Ended up with 850 tss for this week. Happy with all of these nice numbers.
#7544
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
true in theory, not so in practice. that manufacturer's PM is sensitive to ring changes.
in my direct experience, slope is susceptible to change when anything on those units is changed -- ring, arms, bolt type (SS or alu), or even torque changes on bolts with the same rings.
you certainly don't have to care about it, but this is a discussion forum. i don't care whether your power is correct or not, but declaring it 'all good' without verifying is simply not possible. those kinds of statements get read and passed on.
this is NOT true for all spiders, but it has been true for all generations of Quarqs that I have seen.
(and, yes, they needed software to specifically correct for ring and temperature changes because it's not handled directly by hardware; arm changes are incredibly rare, so it's not that the unit is unaffected -- it's just that it doesn't come up often enough.)
still, as i said before, if cadence was the same with longer arms, that would explain higher power. hell, maybe you are even stronger than the #s indicate, but it was masked by a slope change that corresponds to lower power.
#7545
Senior Member
#7548
Nonsense
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,918
Bikes: Affirmative
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 880 Post(s)
Liked 541 Times
in
237 Posts
4hrs with globecanvas and 3 others at a mostly civil pace. Tried out some aero stuff on some pulls, and attacked a climb 1hr in and 3.75hrs in to see how legs would respond after the previous 3 day's volume (4, 5, 5). The watts are there and I feel sluggish but OK, which is good because it means I'm not in race shape and there will be gains to be had once build starts. I bugged out on the last 1.5hrs of the ride (I was going to ride home from the finish) but I didn't feel like being lost in my thoughts and called it a day.
~21hrs. 950 TSS. Feel like a slacker (seriously. i have issues.) Last week was 21.5hrs @ 950TSS or so. Next week I'd like to aim for 24ish hours, which is what I wanted this week, but life gets in the way sometimes. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The last time I checked my CTL was 3 weeks ago and it was 104. So I'm going to guess my CTL is higher than 104 at this point.
~21hrs. 950 TSS. Feel like a slacker (seriously. i have issues.) Last week was 21.5hrs @ 950TSS or so. Next week I'd like to aim for 24ish hours, which is what I wanted this week, but life gets in the way sometimes. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The last time I checked my CTL was 3 weeks ago and it was 104. So I'm going to guess my CTL is higher than 104 at this point.
#7549
Senior Member
2.5hrs on zwift @ 80%, trying not to be bitter that I didn't get to ride outside in 50 degree weather yesterday