Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Science behind the steele frame

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Science behind the steele frame

Old 08-29-20, 02:28 PM
  #1  
gthomson
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
gthomson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Great White North
Posts: 760

Bikes: 2013 Cannondale Caad 8, 2010 Opus Fidelio, Peugeot UO14, Trek 800 Anetelope, 1999 Peugeot Dune, Sakai Select, L'Avantage, 1971 Gitane Apache Standard

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 332 Post(s)
Liked 221 Times in 157 Posts
Science behind the steele frame

Have you ever had one of those discussions with someone who is only interested in the latest and greatest bike tech and when you start talking about how good a steele bike is they look at you with a distaste? The only thing I can say to respond is the ride is just so much smoother than newer bikes (can only attest to aluminum bikes as I've never ridden carbon) but is there any fact behind what I'm saying? Do the steel bikes have a more solid frame and give that smooth easy ride? There must be some data out there that would back up why these bikes are in some cases, better than new ones. Sure, I get new shifters are more convenient than down tube shifters, and group sets are better, etc... but the steel frames have a different feel to them.

Can anyone back me up or am I just sentimental to the bikes I rode when I was younger?
gthomson is offline  
Old 08-29-20, 02:43 PM
  #2  
TenGrainBread 
Senior Member
 
TenGrainBread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,589

Bikes: Cherubim, Alps, a few Schwinns

Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1072 Post(s)
Liked 402 Times in 255 Posts
People say a lot of things but it doesn't make sense to say that specific materials have a certain ride quality. The materials come in such a wide variety of alloys, tube diameters, wall thickness, and shapes that it's just silly to generalize about a material when it's really all of these factors plus the components and geometry that affect the ride quality, not the general fact that the frame is made of steel or aluminum or carbon fiber.
TenGrainBread is offline  
Likes For TenGrainBread:
Old 08-29-20, 02:46 PM
  #3  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 19,068

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 165 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5342 Post(s)
Liked 2,074 Times in 1,347 Posts
If you happen to like old steel bikes and how they ride, you won't get a lot of argument from the C&V people.
bikemig is offline  
Likes For bikemig:
Old 08-29-20, 02:50 PM
  #4  
wgscott
Occam's Rotor
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,309 Times in 1,153 Posts
Just remember, if it wasn't for carbon, your steel bike would be a bunch of iron pipes.
wgscott is offline  
Old 08-29-20, 02:51 PM
  #5  
Reynolds 
Passista
 
Reynolds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,288

Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Liked 433 Times in 244 Posts
Steel is real and doesn't asplode.
Reynolds is offline  
Old 08-29-20, 02:54 PM
  #6  
79pmooney
A Roadie Forever
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 9,911

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 105 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3149 Post(s)
Liked 1,799 Times in 1,181 Posts
A regular occurrence on Cycle Oregon rides where chip seal and other less than "great" pavements are common - the pavement goes form good to chip seal (perhaps as we turn onto another road) and riders on modern bikes slow down. The joke among those of us on steel or titanium is that we have to be on the brakes for those pavement changes so we don't hit the riders ahead. Chip seal ends and there is always a chorus of "ahh!!"

This isn't a fair test. Those of us on the old school bikes tend to be riders of a lot of experience and at Cycle Oregon the vast majority of the new bikes are less than the top models being ridden by relatively inexperienced riders. (The experience riders on the good stuff left earlier than I am willing with my knees that love warmth.) Still, it's pretty funny.
79pmooney is offline  
Likes For 79pmooney:
Old 08-29-20, 02:58 PM
  #7  
79pmooney
A Roadie Forever
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 9,911

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 105 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3149 Post(s)
Liked 1,799 Times in 1,181 Posts
Originally Posted by wgscott View Post
Just remember, if it wasn't for carbon, your steel bike would be a bunch of iron pipes.
Nah. Too many bright engineer types. Bikes would have migrated to wood early. (Yeah, wood is carbon based, but then so are we so no carbon, nothing to discuss and nobody to discuss it with.)
79pmooney is offline  
Likes For 79pmooney:
Old 08-29-20, 03:42 PM
  #8  
Salamandrine 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,287

Bikes: 78 Masi Criterium, 68 PX10, 2016 Mercian King of Mercia, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr

Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2313 Post(s)
Liked 571 Times in 410 Posts
Wooden rims were the performance choice for a long time. Like artificial carbon, they tended to assplode. The move to aluminum was as much about safety as performance. I learned this from Coach Walthour, football coach at my high school. How's that for a name drop.
Salamandrine is offline  
Likes For Salamandrine:
Old 08-29-20, 03:58 PM
  #9  
conspiratemus1
Used to be Conspiratemus
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,500
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 290 Post(s)
Liked 242 Times in 161 Posts
Originally Posted by 79pmooney View Post
Nah. Too many bright engineer types. Bikes would have migrated to wood early. (Yeah, wood is carbon based, but then so are we so no carbon, nothing to discuss and nobody to discuss it with.)
Even to smelt raw pig iron out of ore, you need a good hot form of carbon, like coke or charcoal. ”Green” electricity works for aluminum smelting and for making high-grade steel. But the developing world’s blast furnaces need coal (which we want to come from Canada.)
conspiratemus1 is offline  
Old 08-29-20, 04:04 PM
  #10  
gearbasher
Senior Member
 
gearbasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sitting on my butt in front of a computer
Posts: 1,159
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 283 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times in 134 Posts
Originally Posted by conspiratemus1 View Post
Even to smelt raw pig iron out of ore, you need a good hot form of carbon, like coke or charcoal. ”Green” electricity works for aluminum smelting and for making high-grade steel. But the developing world’s blast furnaces need coal (which we want to come from Canada.)
I'm glad you put "Green" in quotes. 62.7% of electricity in the US is generated by using fossil fuels.
gearbasher is offline  
Old 08-29-20, 04:07 PM
  #11  
Salamandrine 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,287

Bikes: 78 Masi Criterium, 68 PX10, 2016 Mercian King of Mercia, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr

Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2313 Post(s)
Liked 571 Times in 410 Posts
The main thing about carbon fiber is its MOE. It's much better than steel WRT stiffness to weight. No getting around that. This quality doesn't necessarily lend itself to the most comfortable ride. It is better from a performance standpoint, planing notwithstanding..

Quality CF also beats steel in most cases for fatigue resistance.

What it sucks at is toughness. Hit it with a rock or crash it, and it can't be trusted anymore. For me and most recreational riders, it doesn't seem worth it to save a couple pounds, just to have to worry if your bike will assplode cuz it got pinged with a rock. My bikes get pinged with rocks all the time. And frankly, lost 2 or 3 pounds would be a more prudent performance boost.

Also, CF bikes are noisy. I don't like the sound they make.

But bro, yer preachin to the choir here, obviously.
Salamandrine is offline  
Likes For Salamandrine:
Old 08-29-20, 04:17 PM
  #12  
top506
Death fork? Naaaah!!
 
top506's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The other Maine, north of RT 2
Posts: 5,057

Bikes: Seriously downsizing.

Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 473 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 147 Posts
Originally Posted by 79pmooney View Post
This isn't a fair test. Those of us on the old school bikes tend to be riders of a lot of experience
Truth, truth, and truth.

Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.

(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
top506 is offline  
Old 08-29-20, 04:24 PM
  #13  
iab
Senior Member
 
iab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 11,085
Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2351 Post(s)
Liked 1,806 Times in 786 Posts
I don't know how to quantify it, but nothing is smoother than Steele.


iab is offline  
Old 08-29-20, 04:45 PM
  #14  
conspiratemus1
Used to be Conspiratemus
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,500
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 290 Post(s)
Liked 242 Times in 161 Posts
Originally Posted by gearbasher View Post
I'm glad you put "Green" in quotes. 62.7% of electricity in the US is generated by using fossil fuels.
Yes, hence the quotes, since it varies so much around the world. Canada does have a green electricity grid, which is why we can make such vast quantities of aluminum economically. Of the populous provinces, only Alberta burns much coal and gas for electricity. In my Ontario, it almost all comes from uranium and falling water, with gas turbines just for peak demand. Trivial wind & solar. Thing is, if our country was drier, and with higher population density, we would need more energy-dense sources, like fossil fuels. Anti-nuke sentiment remains strong even though our plants have never had an accident and CANDUs cannot melt down from loss of moderator.

All that said, Canada’s over-all emissions per capita are higher than the U.S., even though the grid is green.
Cold country needs a lot of (cheap, cheap!) natural gas for space heating and highly suburbanized population that likes pickup trucks & SUVs burns a lot of gasoline, diesel, and (pre-pandemic) jet fuel. And we export vast quantities of fossil fuel, extraction of which emits more than shale formations. Many U.S. states are miles ahead of Canada nationally, because nationally there are winners and losers at each other’s throats in any climate plan.(Small country = small politics.)

But carbon-fibre is the ultimate carbon-capture technology, eh? :-)
conspiratemus1 is offline  
Likes For conspiratemus1:
Old 08-29-20, 05:09 PM
  #15  
BFisher 
Senior Member
 
BFisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,920
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 608 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times in 649 Posts
Don't forget, with carbon fiber you have to remember to keep it away from dogs as they may chew through it. Especially bull terriers.

My cat started nibbling on the leg of a steel kitchen stool and I just smiled, "Chew away, buddy. That stool will be just fine."
BFisher is offline  
Old 08-29-20, 05:55 PM
  #16  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 8,995

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 176 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2742 Post(s)
Liked 2,176 Times in 1,438 Posts
Originally Posted by gthomson View Post
Have you ever had one of those discussions with someone who is only interested in the latest and greatest bike tech and when you start talking about how good a steele bike is they look at you with a distaste? The only thing I can say to respond is the ride is just so much smoother than newer bikes (can only attest to aluminum bikes as I've never ridden carbon) but is there any fact behind what I'm saying? Do the steel bikes have a more solid frame and give that smooth easy ride? There must be some data out there that would back up why these bikes are in some cases, better than new ones. Sure, I get new shifters are more convenient than down tube shifters, and group sets are better, etc... but the steel frames have a different feel to them.

Can anyone back me up or am I just sentimental to the bikes I rode when I was younger?
Yes, no, all of the above.

Highly subjective, depends on builder. construction, materials and process, perception, predisposition, bias, voodoo, mojo and so much more.

We know what it is because it is what it is to us and we know it.

I always use the music analogy, vinyl has soul like steel, cd's, carbon fibre, plastic, aluminum do not.

The snobby bias has been here for a long time.

Its getting worse and is accelerating with the ever increasing threadless, cartridge, disposable cookie cutter mentality that has many things circling the drain that we used to be able think and work our way through.

Get off my lawn!

In other words I agree 100%

Last edited by merziac; 08-30-20 at 12:14 AM.
merziac is offline  
Old 08-29-20, 07:00 PM
  #17  
70sSanO
Senior Member
 
70sSanO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 4,302

Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1359 Post(s)
Liked 1,247 Times in 790 Posts
I would think that modern carbon frames can be designed to be more comfortable than a steel bike. Trek is putting dampeners in some of their frames. It is a more versatile material.

Straight tube bikes are somewhat limited in shape and design plays a big role, and I would think titanium, that is not a steel, would be the next on comfort with all things being equal.

Next would be steel.

Aluminum would probably be the least comfortable, having a couple of Cannondales, and I put it at the back of the class. I’ve never ridden a Vitus 979, so I can’t rate how comfortable that flexible frame was to ride.

John
70sSanO is online now  
Old 08-29-20, 07:42 PM
  #18  
cb400bill
Forum Moderator
 
cb400bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,041

Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR gravel Viscount Aerospace Pro Schwinn Paramount PDG 5

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2640 Post(s)
Liked 3,870 Times in 2,314 Posts
I like my steel framed bike. I find it to be comfortable.
I like my aluminum framed bike. I find it to be comfortable.
I like my carbon fiber bike. I find it to be comfortable.
cb400bill is offline  
Likes For cb400bill:
Old 08-29-20, 08:04 PM
  #19  
Bob the Mech
Senior Member
 
Bob the Mech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: South Wales
Posts: 206

Bikes: 2016 Trek Emonda S6 frameset, custom build (road). 1995 Dawes Genesis Reynolds 531 Competition frameset, custom build (road). 1996 Orange C16R frameset, custom build (retro MTB). Coyote Dual hard-tail, custom build (MTB).

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 61 Post(s)
Liked 76 Times in 55 Posts
531 Reynolds Comp build, comfortable with a neutral ride, more so now with 23-25c tyres than the 20c I used to run in the 90's.
Trek Emonda S6 build, comfortable and a far more responsive ride, better power transfer through a sizeable chunk of frame around the bottom bracket and 2.5Kg (5.5lbs) lighter than the 531.

I still do most of my riding on steel...
Bob the Mech is offline  
Old 08-29-20, 09:30 PM
  #20  
obrentharris 
Senior Member
 
obrentharris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Point Reyes Station, California
Posts: 3,674

Bikes: Indeed!

Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1086 Post(s)
Liked 1,506 Times in 561 Posts
Originally Posted by Salamandrine View Post
Wooden rims were the performance choice for a long time. Like artificial carbon, they tended to assplode. The move to aluminum was as much about safety as performance. I learned this from Coach Walthour, football coach at my high school. How's that for a name drop.
Jimmy Walthour?

Brent
obrentharris is offline  
Old 08-30-20, 09:02 AM
  #21  
Lascauxcaveman 
Senior Member
 
Lascauxcaveman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,906

Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.

Mentioned: 186 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1581 Post(s)
Liked 495 Times in 291 Posts
The worst bikes I have ever ridden were all made of steel.

Also the best bikes I have ever ridden.
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Trek 400 ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●

Last edited by Lascauxcaveman; 09-01-20 at 11:42 PM.
Lascauxcaveman is offline  
Likes For Lascauxcaveman:
Old 08-30-20, 09:26 AM
  #22  
branko_76 
Senior Member
 
branko_76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,328

Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .....Raleigh "Super GP"...... ........................................

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 522 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times in 269 Posts
I only ride steel bikes, not because they are better than carbon fiber (which I have never ridden) but because they are easy to find, repair and restore. They are what I grew up with.

That said, I would prefer a properly designed CF bike over a poorly designed steel bike.
branko_76 is offline  
Likes For branko_76:
Old 08-30-20, 10:47 AM
  #23  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 23,168

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 134 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2815 Post(s)
Liked 1,654 Times in 1,014 Posts
Originally Posted by 70sSanO View Post
I would think that modern carbon frames can be designed to be more comfortable than a steel bike.
I'm sure they could be, but marketing long ago convinced people that "stiffness" is the paragon virtue in bike frames, and now customers look for that in high-end bikes. It's a vicious circle.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 08-30-20, 11:03 AM
  #24  
Korina
Happy banana slug
 
Korina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 2,656

Bikes: 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1011 Post(s)
Liked 750 Times in 486 Posts
You asked for it, you got it. Here's an engineer's perspective. Warning; math ahead.



Korina is offline  
Likes For Korina:
Old 08-30-20, 11:09 AM
  #25  
easyupbug 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,895

Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 342 Post(s)
Liked 211 Times in 158 Posts
Originally Posted by TenGrainBread View Post
People say a lot of things but it doesn't make sense to say that specific materials have a certain ride quality. The materials come in such a wide variety of alloys, tube diameters, wall thickness, and shapes that it's just silly to generalize about a material when it's really all of these factors plus the components and geometry that affect the ride quality, not the general fact that the frame is made of steel or aluminum or carbon fiber.
TenGrainBread nailed it. I had an aluminum Raleigh pass through my shop and I think I lost a filling checking the thing out after refurbishing it due to that frame. I love my more vintage aluminum Vitus 979.
easyupbug is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.