Rear Wheel mounting problem
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Rear Wheel mounting problem
I`m not sure if I should try this folder, or the Mechanics folder?
I have a 86' Schwinn Passage.
Whenever I have to take the front tire off, it just pops on and off, no problems.
But when I have to remove the rear tire, I have to give it a good pull to get it off.
And putting it back on is almost impossible! It`s like the opening on the tire is bigger than the opening on the bikes frame!
I almost have try to pull and the frame and try to get the wheel in the slot at the same time. Which you can`t do unless you have four hands.
It`s like the seat stays and chain stays need to be pulled apart?
I have a 86' Schwinn Passage.
Whenever I have to take the front tire off, it just pops on and off, no problems.
But when I have to remove the rear tire, I have to give it a good pull to get it off.
And putting it back on is almost impossible! It`s like the opening on the tire is bigger than the opening on the bikes frame!
I almost have try to pull and the frame and try to get the wheel in the slot at the same time. Which you can`t do unless you have four hands.
It`s like the seat stays and chain stays need to be pulled apart?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 675
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 233 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 220 Times
in
142 Posts
NO.
There is a proper way to spread steel stays, and that isn't it.
You have no way of knowing if the stays were aligned before or after if you don't measure, and if you attempt to spread the stays as described above you are unlikely to finish with them aligned even if they were to begin with.
Likes For oneclick:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 13,771
Mentioned: 317 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1949 Post(s)
Liked 1,276 Times
in
695 Posts
I`m not sure if I should try this folder, or the Mechanics folder?
I have a 86' Schwinn Passage.
Whenever I have to take the front tire off, it just pops on and off, no problems.
But when I have to remove the rear tire, I have to give it a good pull to get it off.
And putting it back on is almost impossible! It`s like the opening on the tire is bigger than the opening on the bikes frame!
I almost have try to pull and the frame and try to get the wheel in the slot at the same time. Which you can`t do unless you have four hands.
It`s like the seat stays and chain stays need to be pulled apart?
I have a 86' Schwinn Passage.
Whenever I have to take the front tire off, it just pops on and off, no problems.
But when I have to remove the rear tire, I have to give it a good pull to get it off.
And putting it back on is almost impossible! It`s like the opening on the tire is bigger than the opening on the bikes frame!
I almost have try to pull and the frame and try to get the wheel in the slot at the same time. Which you can`t do unless you have four hands.
It`s like the seat stays and chain stays need to be pulled apart?
Likes For nlerner:
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Has the original rear wheel been replaced at some point? Sounds like it. Back in the time of 5-speed rear clusters, spacing between the dropouts was 120mm. When 6- and 7-speed became common, dropouts spacing increased to 126mm. Then 8-speed on up call for 130mm spacing. Mtn bike rear wheels (and some touring bikes) have 135mm spacing. Measure your dropouts, and measure your rear hub from locknut to locknut. See how they compare.
Looking back , the rear wheel Was replaced over 30 some years ago.
I now remember getting it caught between the grass and sidewalk. When I tried to ride out of it, back onto the sidewalk, the rim got bent Very badly.
The LBS shop said they had a wheel from a tandem bike they could put on, and it would cost less then getting a new rim, and rebuild.
Since both the original wheel and tandem wheel both were 40 spoke.
NOW, What are my options. The difference must be not too much more than 1/16 on an inch.
But, my sanity can`t take too many more times trying to pull on the chain stays , And slide the wheel in at the same time.
'

#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 13,771
Mentioned: 317 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1949 Post(s)
Liked 1,276 Times
in
695 Posts
There’s plenty of DIY stuff online to spread your dropouts (such as https://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-spacing.html) or take it to your LBS to have it done properly and ensure that everything is aligned.
#7
smelling the roses
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tixkokob, Yucatán, México
Posts: 14,480
Bikes: 79 Trek 930, 80 Trek 414, 84 Schwinn Letour Luxe (coupled), 92 Schwinn Paramount PDG 5
Mentioned: 103 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6549 Post(s)
Liked 687 Times
in
452 Posts
There’s plenty of DIY stuff online to spread your dropouts (such as https://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-spacing.html) or take it to your LBS to have it done properly and ensure that everything is aligned.
__________________
Well look what the cat dragged in. Such a fine addition to the thread
Well look what the cat dragged in. Such a fine addition to the thread
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Winslow, AR
Posts: 1,507
Bikes: '83 univega gran turismo x2, '85 schwinn super le tour,'89 miyata triple cross, '91 GT tequesta, '90 yokota grizzly peak, '94 GT backwoods, '95'ish scott tampico, '98 bonty privateer, '93 mongoose crossway 625, '98 parkpre ariel, 2k'ish giant fcr3
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 302 Post(s)
Liked 163 Times
in
122 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Is it possible to reduce the hub width? If there is room between the smallest cog and the dropout, remove and swapping around the spacers or locknuts to equally reduce each side. If you do each side the same amount the dish of the wheel will not be effected.
#11
Used to be Conspiratemus
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,457
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 270 Post(s)
Liked 219 Times
in
146 Posts
If the wheel came from a tandem 30 years ago, it likely has an OLD of 135 mm. 140 was starting to appear but 140 would not be able to be crammed into a singe-bike frame. There were some tandems still made with 130 and if the OP’s bike is 126, the tandem wheel could have been made to fit poorly, as he describes.
So, before you go bending your frame willy-nilly, the first thing to do is measure the width between the inner faces of the dropouts and the over-locknut dimension of the hub, and you need to tell us what kind of hub you have—cassette or freewheel, and whether the hub can be shortened on one or both axle ends. A cassette hub can’t be shortened on the right side — well, maybe a millimetre— but a freewheel hub can be.
The question is whether the frame should be widened to fit the wheel, or should the hub be shortened to fit the frame, if the latter is even possible given the design of the hub. Photos showing these details will be more useful than one of the bike leaning against a tree and showing only the front end.
Much depends on how handy you are with tools, and how much experience you have with bike repair. You might be better off just buying a cheap rear wheel — it’s a wheel you need, not a “tire” — of the correct size, rather than tackling the job of making two parts fit together when they weren’t meant to.
Edit: As nlerner says, if you make the OLD narrower, you must make sure that the axle ends do not protrude even a hair’s breadth past the outer face of the dropouts (assuming it’s a quick-release hub.). This will require a hacksaw.
So, before you go bending your frame willy-nilly, the first thing to do is measure the width between the inner faces of the dropouts and the over-locknut dimension of the hub, and you need to tell us what kind of hub you have—cassette or freewheel, and whether the hub can be shortened on one or both axle ends. A cassette hub can’t be shortened on the right side — well, maybe a millimetre— but a freewheel hub can be.
The question is whether the frame should be widened to fit the wheel, or should the hub be shortened to fit the frame, if the latter is even possible given the design of the hub. Photos showing these details will be more useful than one of the bike leaning against a tree and showing only the front end.
Much depends on how handy you are with tools, and how much experience you have with bike repair. You might be better off just buying a cheap rear wheel — it’s a wheel you need, not a “tire” — of the correct size, rather than tackling the job of making two parts fit together when they weren’t meant to.
Edit: As nlerner says, if you make the OLD narrower, you must make sure that the axle ends do not protrude even a hair’s breadth past the outer face of the dropouts (assuming it’s a quick-release hub.). This will require a hacksaw.
Last edited by conspiratemus1; 01-11-21 at 09:53 AM.
Likes For conspiratemus1:
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I stopped by my LBS with the bike today.
They did some measuring and looked at the wheel.
They said the frame appears to be bent. It was off by 5mm.
They`re going to bend it out 5mm, for 20 bucks.
They did some measuring and looked at the wheel.
They said the frame appears to be bent. It was off by 5mm.
They`re going to bend it out 5mm, for 20 bucks.
Likes For roadsnakes:
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I Agree witht this!!
No.
NO.
There is a proper way to spread steel stays, and that isn't it.
You have no way of knowing if the stays were aligned before or after if you don't measure, and if you attempt to spread the stays as described above you are unlikely to finish with them aligned even if they were to begin with.
NO.
There is a proper way to spread steel stays, and that isn't it.
You have no way of knowing if the stays were aligned before or after if you don't measure, and if you attempt to spread the stays as described above you are unlikely to finish with them aligned even if they were to begin with.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#16
Senior Member
While the bike is in the shop, have them confirm your stem is installed safely. It is a big frame and that looks like a long stem but seems to me it’s not in the steerer tube very far, and you’d have a lot of leverage on it.
There is usually a mark or line that says “their much must be in the steerer”.
I assume you prefer the stem facing backwards for fit?
Nice looking bike btw.
There is usually a mark or line that says “their much must be in the steerer”.
I assume you prefer the stem facing backwards for fit?
Nice looking bike btw.
#17
Senior Member
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
WELL ! Now you have me thinking!
I`ll have to check next time I go out to the garage.
It could very well be 48! I just remember that 30+ years ago the LBS told me they had a used 40 spoke Tandem wheel they could put on, and I never doubted them.
That could explain that I don`t recall having to true the rear wheel in a couple of Decades! LOL
I`ll have to check next time I go out to the garage.
It could very well be 48! I just remember that 30+ years ago the LBS told me they had a used 40 spoke Tandem wheel they could put on, and I never doubted them.
That could explain that I don`t recall having to true the rear wheel in a couple of Decades! LOL

#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
While the bike is in the shop, have them confirm your stem is installed safely. It is a big frame and that looks like a long stem but seems to me it’s not in the steerer tube very far, and you’d have a lot of leverage on it.
There is usually a mark or line that says “their much must be in the steerer”.
I assume you prefer the stem facing backwards for fit?
Nice looking bike btw.
There is usually a mark or line that says “their much must be in the steerer”.
I assume you prefer the stem facing backwards for fit?
Nice looking bike btw.
It`s right at the line of being the Maximum Height.

#20
Senior Member
#21
Senior Member
The passage was 126mm 6 speed. Your rear wheel is too wide.
Likes For uncleivan:
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I picked up the bike from the LBS yesterday.
The original mechanic ,(who was not even born when I bought the bike was built , or when I had the rear wheel replaced) who told me my frame was bent , was wrong.
Another mechanic looked at it and determined the cones were out of adjustment.
After he adjusted the cones and spacing, the wheel fit fine.
The bill stayed at 20 bucks.
The original mechanic ,(who was not even born when I bought the bike was built , or when I had the rear wheel replaced) who told me my frame was bent , was wrong.
Another mechanic looked at it and determined the cones were out of adjustment.
After he adjusted the cones and spacing, the wheel fit fine.
The bill stayed at 20 bucks.

#23
Senior Member
That doesn't sound right. They would have to be so way, way, out of adjustment, to make it appreciably harder to get the wheel in. Have you tried removing the wheel from the dropouts and putting it back in since they worked on it?
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
No I haven`t.
Lots of ice and some snow. Maybe when the weather breaks I`ll check it out, and get back riding it. Right now I`ve been riding my other bike which is better in winter conditions.
I do trust the LBS and the guy that worked on it. I`ve been going to this LBS for over 5 decades.
#25
Used to be Conspiratemus
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,457
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 270 Post(s)
Liked 219 Times
in
146 Posts
The OP was positive he had a 40-spoke wheel and never bothered to count before retorting “it’s 40” when questioned. No doubt he is just as positive the shop fixed his too-wide wheel properly, after initially telling him his frame was bent. So we’ll leave him to it.
Agree with you that the proof doesn’t come till next time he tries to remove the rear wheel. Strange lack of curiosity here. Me, that’s the first thing I’d do, not to distrust the shop, just for the satisfaction of understanding what was wrong exactly.