Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Cranksets: NR and Record Differences?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Cranksets: NR and Record Differences?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-25 | 01:57 AM
  #1  
Vintage Raleigh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 778
Likes: 47
From: Melbourne, Australia

Bikes: 1974 Copper Raleigh International, 1975 Olive Green Raleigh Grand Prix, 1974 Raleigh Europa Custom

Cranksets: NR and Record Differences?

Hi all wanting to purchase a 5 arm Campagnolo pre CPSC crankset replacement for the International and are confused by these names and how to ID them. Is there any difference? Cheers.
Vintage Raleigh is offline  
Reply
Old 06-01-25 | 07:45 AM
  #2  
Vintage Trek Black Hole
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 1,346
From: Portland, Cascadia

Bikes: 1976 Merz' Tourer, 1984 Strawberry, 1978 Trek 910, 1982 Trek 950, 1982 Trek 720, 1981 Trek 510

Originally Posted by Vintage Raleigh
Hi all wanting to purchase a 5 arm Campagnolo pre CPSC crankset replacement for the International and are confused by these names and how to ID them. Is there any difference? Cheers.
I believe there's no such designation by Campagnolo, the "Strada" crankarms are the same, whether they by Record, Nuovo Record, Super Record. The chainrings are different for Super Record.

Edited to add: this is true after 1966. Before that, there were 151 bcd Strada cranksets and they had some minor differences as well. I mostly come across the "newer" models (70s or 80s) so I forgot about those.

Last edited by jPrichard10; 06-01-25 at 07:50 AM.
jPrichard10 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-01-25 | 08:45 AM
  #3  
jdawginsc's Avatar
Edumacator
Titanium Club Membership
5 Anniversary
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 9,625
Likes: 5,112
From: Goose Creek, SC

Bikes: More than the people who ride them...oy.

Originally Posted by jPrichard10
I believe there's no such designation by Campagnolo, the "Strada" crankarms are the same, whether they by Record, Nuovo Record, Super Record. The chainrings are different for Super Record.

Edited to add: this is true after 1966. Before that, there were 151 bcd Strada cranksets and they had some minor differences as well. I mostly come across the "newer" models (70s or 80s) so I forgot about those.
That’s my understanding as well. Crank arms are Record and the chainrings are NR or SR.

Pretty sure this is also true with hubs?
__________________
1987 Crest C'dale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin EL, 1990 Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Isoard, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 C'dale M500, 1984 Mercian Pro, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi ?, 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super, 1971 Raleigh Internat'l, 1998 Corratec U+D, 1991 Peugeot Slimestone, 1987 Bianchi Volpe, 1995 Trek 750




















jdawginsc is online now  
Reply
Old 06-01-25 | 09:18 AM
  #4  
kroozer's Avatar
vintage motor
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 349
From: Tepic, Nayarit, Mexico

Bikes: 48 Automoto, 49 Stallard, 50 Rotrax, 62 Jack Taylor, 67 Atala, 68 Lejeune, 72-74-75 Motobecanes, 73 RIH, 71 Zieleman, 74 Raleigh, 78 Windsor, 83 Messina (Villata), 84 Brazzo (Losa), 85 Davidson, 90 Diamondback, 92 Kestrel

When the Nuovo Record rear derailleur came out in 1967, people started applying the name to the entire Record group, but I don't know if there were ever any other components that actually had the NR moniker. Super Record also used a lot of the same components including the crank arms. The Record cranks were basically the same from 1958 to whenever they stopped making Super Record, except that they changed the bolt circle diameter from 151 mm to 144 mm in about 1967..
kroozer is offline  
Reply
Old 06-01-25 | 12:33 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,818
Likes: 3,723
I will discard the very early cranks and the 151 BCD units. plenty of stuff there that is interesting but not relevant.

As noted earlier, Nuovo Record was a bottom up name used by bike shops to streamline the explanation of the Group.

ok, Pre CPSC will have NO date marks or a numeral in a diamond 5 or under.
Gets tricky with 6 in a diamond, the transition year.
the Pre cranks will have a bigger, "ant hill" at the bore. the Post CPSC will be much lower.
if original chainrings, there will be a pin to positioned behind the crank arm to prevent a chain jam. earlier cranks with the chainring pin will need to be filed back to clear.

what was really going on?
the post CPSC spindle is longer, about 115mm but the broach at the bore was moved, providing the extra space between the chainring and the back of the arm to provide room for the formed lip of the revised cage.

the Q factor of the earlier cranks is narrower compared to the later.

to add to the hot mess, not all 115mm spindles have the same dimensions to the tapers. Shield logo... beware.

then there is Super Record... but that would be telling.
repechage is offline  
Reply
Old 06-01-25 | 07:44 PM
  #6  
Vintage Raleigh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 778
Likes: 47
From: Melbourne, Australia

Bikes: 1974 Copper Raleigh International, 1975 Olive Green Raleigh Grand Prix, 1974 Raleigh Europa Custom

Originally Posted by repechage
I will discard the very early cranks and the 151 BCD units. plenty of stuff there that is interesting but not relevant.

As noted earlier, Nuovo Record was a bottom up name used by bike shops to streamline the explanation of the Group.

ok, Pre CPSC will have NO date marks or a numeral in a diamond 5 or under.
Gets tricky with 6 in a diamond, the transition year.
the Pre cranks will have a bigger, "ant hill" at the bore. the Post CPSC will be much lower.
if original chainrings, there will be a pin to positioned behind the crank arm to prevent a chain jam. earlier cranks with the chainring pin will need to be filed back to clear.

what was really going on?
the post CPSC spindle is longer, about 115mm but the broach at the bore was moved, providing the extra space between the chainring and the back of the arm to provide room for the formed lip of the revised cage.

the Q factor of the earlier cranks is narrower compared to the later.

to add to the hot mess, not all 115mm spindles have the same dimensions to the tapers. Shield logo... beware.

then there is Super Record... but that would be telling.
So this is Post CPSC?






Vintage Raleigh is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-25 | 08:57 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,818
Likes: 3,723
yes, known by the low rise to the bore, and there is nothing like fresh Campagnolo.
1977 date code at least on the arm that I can read.
repechage is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-25 | 11:30 AM
  #8  
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Old fart
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,361
Likes: 5,271
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

The "Nuovo Record" designation only applies to the bottom bracket, the crank arms themselves are the same across Record, Nuovo Record and Super Record cranksets. There are, however, differences between pre- and post-CPSC crank arms, as described in this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TZw...usp=drive_link
JohnDThompson is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-25 | 12:16 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,818
Likes: 3,723
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
The "Nuovo Record" designation only applies to the bottom bracket, the crank arms themselves are the same across Record, Nuovo Record and Super Record cranksets. There are, however, differences between pre- and post-CPSC crank arms, as described in this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TZw...usp=drive_link
It is too bad there was no graphic representation to go along with the text.

I am working on one to assist in visualizing the modifications.

one issue is that the spindle is often referenced to the outside diameter lip of the races, this is an uncontrolled surface. this is persistent no matter the brand, not a huge deal but I have found variations.

I assert that the arms have at least three variations, even from 1967 forward- the last iteration I refer to Super Record, there were no more older ring chainsets produced. no flutes ( two variations of branding) that on the backside of Drive side arm has CNC milling to arrest the classic crank arm cracking at the spider/ arm crotch.
repechage is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-25 | 12:19 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,818
Likes: 3,723
for Vintage Raleigh

he has identified the post CPSC set he is seeking.
repechage is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-25 | 06:40 PM
  #11  
Vintage Raleigh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 778
Likes: 47
From: Melbourne, Australia

Bikes: 1974 Copper Raleigh International, 1975 Olive Green Raleigh Grand Prix, 1974 Raleigh Europa Custom

Thankyou all for the responses.
Looks like I'll just have to wait until a Pre CPSC crankset becomes available for the 1975 International.
Vintage Raleigh is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.