Cranksets: NR and Record Differences?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 778
Likes: 47
From: Melbourne, Australia
Bikes: 1974 Copper Raleigh International, 1975 Olive Green Raleigh Grand Prix, 1974 Raleigh Europa Custom
Cranksets: NR and Record Differences?
Hi all wanting to purchase a 5 arm Campagnolo pre CPSC crankset replacement for the International and are confused by these names and how to ID them. Is there any difference? Cheers.
#2
Vintage Trek Black Hole



Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 1,346
From: Portland, Cascadia
Bikes: 1976 Merz' Tourer, 1984 Strawberry, 1978 Trek 910, 1982 Trek 950, 1982 Trek 720, 1981 Trek 510
Edited to add: this is true after 1966. Before that, there were 151 bcd Strada cranksets and they had some minor differences as well. I mostly come across the "newer" models (70s or 80s) so I forgot about those.
Last edited by jPrichard10; 06-01-25 at 07:50 AM.
#3
Edumacator




Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 9,625
Likes: 5,112
From: Goose Creek, SC
Bikes: More than the people who ride them...oy.
I believe there's no such designation by Campagnolo, the "Strada" crankarms are the same, whether they by Record, Nuovo Record, Super Record. The chainrings are different for Super Record.
Edited to add: this is true after 1966. Before that, there were 151 bcd Strada cranksets and they had some minor differences as well. I mostly come across the "newer" models (70s or 80s) so I forgot about those.
Edited to add: this is true after 1966. Before that, there were 151 bcd Strada cranksets and they had some minor differences as well. I mostly come across the "newer" models (70s or 80s) so I forgot about those.
Pretty sure this is also true with hubs?
__________________
1987 Crest C'dale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin EL, 1990 Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Isoard, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 C'dale M500, 1984 Mercian Pro, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi ?, 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super, 1971 Raleigh Internat'l, 1998 Corratec U+D, 1991 Peugeot Slimestone, 1987 Bianchi Volpe, 1995 Trek 750
1987 Crest C'dale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin EL, 1990 Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Isoard, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 C'dale M500, 1984 Mercian Pro, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi ?, 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super, 1971 Raleigh Internat'l, 1998 Corratec U+D, 1991 Peugeot Slimestone, 1987 Bianchi Volpe, 1995 Trek 750
#4
vintage motor


Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 349
From: Tepic, Nayarit, Mexico
Bikes: 48 Automoto, 49 Stallard, 50 Rotrax, 62 Jack Taylor, 67 Atala, 68 Lejeune, 72-74-75 Motobecanes, 73 RIH, 71 Zieleman, 74 Raleigh, 78 Windsor, 83 Messina (Villata), 84 Brazzo (Losa), 85 Davidson, 90 Diamondback, 92 Kestrel
When the Nuovo Record rear derailleur came out in 1967, people started applying the name to the entire Record group, but I don't know if there were ever any other components that actually had the NR moniker. Super Record also used a lot of the same components including the crank arms. The Record cranks were basically the same from 1958 to whenever they stopped making Super Record, except that they changed the bolt circle diameter from 151 mm to 144 mm in about 1967..
#5
Senior Member


Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,818
Likes: 3,723
I will discard the very early cranks and the 151 BCD units. plenty of stuff there that is interesting but not relevant.
As noted earlier, Nuovo Record was a bottom up name used by bike shops to streamline the explanation of the Group.
ok, Pre CPSC will have NO date marks or a numeral in a diamond 5 or under.
Gets tricky with 6 in a diamond, the transition year.
the Pre cranks will have a bigger, "ant hill" at the bore. the Post CPSC will be much lower.
if original chainrings, there will be a pin to positioned behind the crank arm to prevent a chain jam. earlier cranks with the chainring pin will need to be filed back to clear.
what was really going on?
the post CPSC spindle is longer, about 115mm but the broach at the bore was moved, providing the extra space between the chainring and the back of the arm to provide room for the formed lip of the revised cage.
the Q factor of the earlier cranks is narrower compared to the later.
to add to the hot mess, not all 115mm spindles have the same dimensions to the tapers. Shield logo... beware.
then there is Super Record... but that would be telling.
As noted earlier, Nuovo Record was a bottom up name used by bike shops to streamline the explanation of the Group.
ok, Pre CPSC will have NO date marks or a numeral in a diamond 5 or under.
Gets tricky with 6 in a diamond, the transition year.
the Pre cranks will have a bigger, "ant hill" at the bore. the Post CPSC will be much lower.
if original chainrings, there will be a pin to positioned behind the crank arm to prevent a chain jam. earlier cranks with the chainring pin will need to be filed back to clear.
what was really going on?
the post CPSC spindle is longer, about 115mm but the broach at the bore was moved, providing the extra space between the chainring and the back of the arm to provide room for the formed lip of the revised cage.
the Q factor of the earlier cranks is narrower compared to the later.
to add to the hot mess, not all 115mm spindles have the same dimensions to the tapers. Shield logo... beware.
then there is Super Record... but that would be telling.
#6
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 778
Likes: 47
From: Melbourne, Australia
Bikes: 1974 Copper Raleigh International, 1975 Olive Green Raleigh Grand Prix, 1974 Raleigh Europa Custom
I will discard the very early cranks and the 151 BCD units. plenty of stuff there that is interesting but not relevant.
As noted earlier, Nuovo Record was a bottom up name used by bike shops to streamline the explanation of the Group.
ok, Pre CPSC will have NO date marks or a numeral in a diamond 5 or under.
Gets tricky with 6 in a diamond, the transition year.
the Pre cranks will have a bigger, "ant hill" at the bore. the Post CPSC will be much lower.
if original chainrings, there will be a pin to positioned behind the crank arm to prevent a chain jam. earlier cranks with the chainring pin will need to be filed back to clear.
what was really going on?
the post CPSC spindle is longer, about 115mm but the broach at the bore was moved, providing the extra space between the chainring and the back of the arm to provide room for the formed lip of the revised cage.
the Q factor of the earlier cranks is narrower compared to the later.
to add to the hot mess, not all 115mm spindles have the same dimensions to the tapers. Shield logo... beware.
then there is Super Record... but that would be telling.
As noted earlier, Nuovo Record was a bottom up name used by bike shops to streamline the explanation of the Group.
ok, Pre CPSC will have NO date marks or a numeral in a diamond 5 or under.
Gets tricky with 6 in a diamond, the transition year.
the Pre cranks will have a bigger, "ant hill" at the bore. the Post CPSC will be much lower.
if original chainrings, there will be a pin to positioned behind the crank arm to prevent a chain jam. earlier cranks with the chainring pin will need to be filed back to clear.
what was really going on?
the post CPSC spindle is longer, about 115mm but the broach at the bore was moved, providing the extra space between the chainring and the back of the arm to provide room for the formed lip of the revised cage.
the Q factor of the earlier cranks is narrower compared to the later.
to add to the hot mess, not all 115mm spindles have the same dimensions to the tapers. Shield logo... beware.
then there is Super Record... but that would be telling.






#8
Old fart



Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,361
Likes: 5,271
From: Appleton WI
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
The "Nuovo Record" designation only applies to the bottom bracket, the crank arms themselves are the same across Record, Nuovo Record and Super Record cranksets. There are, however, differences between pre- and post-CPSC crank arms, as described in this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TZw...usp=drive_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TZw...usp=drive_link
#9
Senior Member


Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,818
Likes: 3,723
The "Nuovo Record" designation only applies to the bottom bracket, the crank arms themselves are the same across Record, Nuovo Record and Super Record cranksets. There are, however, differences between pre- and post-CPSC crank arms, as described in this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TZw...usp=drive_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TZw...usp=drive_link
I am working on one to assist in visualizing the modifications.
one issue is that the spindle is often referenced to the outside diameter lip of the races, this is an uncontrolled surface. this is persistent no matter the brand, not a huge deal but I have found variations.
I assert that the arms have at least three variations, even from 1967 forward- the last iteration I refer to Super Record, there were no more older ring chainsets produced. no flutes ( two variations of branding) that on the backside of Drive side arm has CNC milling to arrest the classic crank arm cracking at the spider/ arm crotch.
#10
Senior Member


Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,818
Likes: 3,723
#11
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 778
Likes: 47
From: Melbourne, Australia
Bikes: 1974 Copper Raleigh International, 1975 Olive Green Raleigh Grand Prix, 1974 Raleigh Europa Custom
Thankyou all for the responses.
Looks like I'll just have to wait until a Pre CPSC crankset becomes available for the 1975 International.
Looks like I'll just have to wait until a Pre CPSC crankset becomes available for the 1975 International.





