Berthoud Saddle:final verdict
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 14
Berthoud Saddle:final verdict
Overall I would not recommend this brand of seat to fellow retro-grouch leather lovers. The overall sticker price and quality simply do not add up. The rails of the saddle require another machined part to hold the rails in place. This feature is design flaw. The Berthoud saddles are not true tensioned leather saddles.
The cover is made from CNC'd thick leather. It's thickness is impressive however the way it is attached in the Berthoud mechanism is flawed. The rails are press fit into a plastic assembly. The rivets are removable.
The saddle can be repaired or taken apart but what good is it if the design is flawed. If a saddle is going to have a rider on it, the rails should not simply be press fit into a plastic polycarbonate plastic plate. It should we welded metal with no potential for twisting or slipping.
Once again it's not a true tensioned leather saddle. The Brooks design has the saddle molded specifically for it's own rail system. The leather when attached to the rails is tight. The rails are welded and won't twist or slip, unless the leather is far too supple.
Please note I am reviewing the Galiber titanium race saddle. The saddle is far too expensive. For the same amount of money I can get a hand hammered copper rivet Brooks. The handmade craftsmanship and old world charm simply don't come with the high price tag of the Berthoud.
Both the Berthoud and Swift saddle feature a fairly narrow hide and that does not really leave enough material for lacing when well broken in. That feature is something every person ought to consider. The Brooks team pro has enough leather to be butchered and tied.
IMO the Berthoud saddle had a good idea but the cheapness of materials and design does not offer a better alternative than Brooks. Some will argue that quality of Berthoud can compete with Brooks. I do not agree at all.
I can't stress enough that the Berthoud is simply a pre-molded hide attached with screws. The Brooks method is different because the leather mold is intended to be fixed to the frame with rivets. The shape is tightly adhered and holds tension and shape.
So.. folks...Anybody who wants to trade a like new or slightly used Brooks Professional for the Berthoud can shoot me an e-mail. Don't get mad because "I told you so"
The cover is made from CNC'd thick leather. It's thickness is impressive however the way it is attached in the Berthoud mechanism is flawed. The rails are press fit into a plastic assembly. The rivets are removable.
The saddle can be repaired or taken apart but what good is it if the design is flawed. If a saddle is going to have a rider on it, the rails should not simply be press fit into a plastic polycarbonate plastic plate. It should we welded metal with no potential for twisting or slipping.
Once again it's not a true tensioned leather saddle. The Brooks design has the saddle molded specifically for it's own rail system. The leather when attached to the rails is tight. The rails are welded and won't twist or slip, unless the leather is far too supple.
Please note I am reviewing the Galiber titanium race saddle. The saddle is far too expensive. For the same amount of money I can get a hand hammered copper rivet Brooks. The handmade craftsmanship and old world charm simply don't come with the high price tag of the Berthoud.
Both the Berthoud and Swift saddle feature a fairly narrow hide and that does not really leave enough material for lacing when well broken in. That feature is something every person ought to consider. The Brooks team pro has enough leather to be butchered and tied.
IMO the Berthoud saddle had a good idea but the cheapness of materials and design does not offer a better alternative than Brooks. Some will argue that quality of Berthoud can compete with Brooks. I do not agree at all.
I can't stress enough that the Berthoud is simply a pre-molded hide attached with screws. The Brooks method is different because the leather mold is intended to be fixed to the frame with rivets. The shape is tightly adhered and holds tension and shape.
So.. folks...Anybody who wants to trade a like new or slightly used Brooks Professional for the Berthoud can shoot me an e-mail. Don't get mad because "I told you so"
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
my berthoud saddle does not twist or slip -- it's solid. how much do you weigh?
I find the construction to be top-notch.
as for saddle comfort, that's such a personal thing. works great for me, but perhaps not for everyone.
I find the construction to be top-notch.
as for saddle comfort, that's such a personal thing. works great for me, but perhaps not for everyone.
#5
Honest question : did you even try riding the saddle? How many miles?
I don't understand how you can offer a review and expect to have it taken seriously when it makes absolutely no mention of how the saddle rides, is it comfortable, is it durable etc etc. I get that you're trying to tell us it isnt a tensioned saddle and by simply looking at it you feel it wasnt worth the money, but is the point of a saddle supposed to be to provide a platform from with you sit on to ride your bike?
So, maybe you just forgot to mention how it rides, how long it took to break in, how it feels after 20 40 or 60 miles on it. How it holds up in different conditions, how durable it is based on using it, and so on. I get that you're not comfortable with how it was built by looking at it, but so what? It's a freakin bike seat. How do you think it functions as a bike seat???
IMO if you added that I'd be able to take your reviews much more seriously. Without that this just seems utterly ridiculous.
I don't understand how you can offer a review and expect to have it taken seriously when it makes absolutely no mention of how the saddle rides, is it comfortable, is it durable etc etc. I get that you're trying to tell us it isnt a tensioned saddle and by simply looking at it you feel it wasnt worth the money, but is the point of a saddle supposed to be to provide a platform from with you sit on to ride your bike?
So, maybe you just forgot to mention how it rides, how long it took to break in, how it feels after 20 40 or 60 miles on it. How it holds up in different conditions, how durable it is based on using it, and so on. I get that you're not comfortable with how it was built by looking at it, but so what? It's a freakin bike seat. How do you think it functions as a bike seat???
IMO if you added that I'd be able to take your reviews much more seriously. Without that this just seems utterly ridiculous.
__________________
I have some bikes.
I have some bikes.
#6
Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,196
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
#7
I drank the Kool-Aid!
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 562
Likes: 4
From: Harrisburg, PA
Bikes: Rivendell Roadini, Rivendell Charlie Gallop Protovelo, Rivendell Clem L
That thread was a mess of abuse and not enjoyable to read. I think a new thread is better than bringing that one back up. Of course this one will probably turn into the same so I guess it doesn't matter.
#8
Hey - I wonder if the hide from these dead horses might be a suitable material for saddle leather..... or do you think they've been beaten too severely already?
__________________
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."
S. J. Perelman
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."
S. J. Perelman
#9
Rustbelt Rider
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,105
Likes: 390
From: Canton, OH
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban
That just makes the leather more pliable.
I'm interested in seeing a response to Holiday76's question. Did the extra piece help secure the rails?
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
#11
Fat Guy on a Little Bike


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,946
Likes: 371
From: Philadelphia, PA
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Sorefeet...since you've crapped on Berthoud and Brooks, what exactly do you recommend?
#12
Insane Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, TX
Bikes: Huffy Grand Prairie 15sp MTB (don't hate!), 1980 Schwinn World Tourist, 1976 Schwinn Traveler, 1974 Romic Custom (project bike!)
fbf,
Hit reply with quote under the post. Read the quoted text.
BE AMAZED.
Hit reply with quote under the post. Read the quoted text.
BE AMAZED.
#13
multimodal commuter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,810
Likes: 597
From: NJ, NYC, LI
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Dead horse?
Type "deadhorse" but change the quotation marks to colons.
Lots of words work that way, such as beer
but for some reason not wine :wine: nor :frenchfries:
Or, below the smileys menu, hit "more" and scroll down. There's some good ones down there.
Voulez-vouz de fritte avec ca?
Type "deadhorse" but change the quotation marks to colons.
Lots of words work that way, such as beer
but for some reason not wine :wine: nor :frenchfries:Or, below the smileys menu, hit "more" and scroll down. There's some good ones down there.
Voulez-vouz de fritte avec ca?
#14
Senior Member


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 522
Likes: 17
From: Hub of the Universe, MA
Bikes: Centurions, Shoguns, and Stumpjumpers
i bet he's going to recommend something old, out of production, and "made better back then than they do now." i'm selling flame suits and torches if anyone wants one.
positive commentary: everyone's rear end is different. as you age, something you thought fit your behind like butter might have turned into a block of lard.
second piece of positive commentary: i went to harris and asked one of the workers there who had something like ten brooks' saddles on his fleet of bicycle. he said he loved the berthoud, and it was worth every penny. however, it was too expensive to justify the cost of replacing all of his saddles. he bought the saddle on a whim, threw it on one of his bicycles, and took a tour all the way to the end of the cape and back without issue.
positive commentary: everyone's rear end is different. as you age, something you thought fit your behind like butter might have turned into a block of lard.
second piece of positive commentary: i went to harris and asked one of the workers there who had something like ten brooks' saddles on his fleet of bicycle. he said he loved the berthoud, and it was worth every penny. however, it was too expensive to justify the cost of replacing all of his saddles. he bought the saddle on a whim, threw it on one of his bicycles, and took a tour all the way to the end of the cape and back without issue.
#15
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 5
From: Somewhere Between The Beginning And The End
#18
.


Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,769
Likes: 38
From: Rocket City, No'ala
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
#19
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,123
Likes: 98
From: Liberty, Missouri
Bikes: 1966 Paramount | 1971 Raleigh International | ca. 1970 Bernard Carre | 1989 Waterford Paramount | 2012 Boulder Brevet | 2019 Specialized Diverge
Man, "fit" and "comfort" are so darned subjective. "Quality" may be less so, but everyone has to be on the same page about what constitutes "quality" - I'm certainly thinking craftsmanship, durability, functionality, etc. I've ridden all sorts of saddles over the years and have zeroed in on about three that best fit my personal needs for different riding situations and which have stood the test of time and use (mine.) But those are my own personal opinions and it took a lot of miles and hours in the saddle for me to reach those opinions. Other people will feel differently, and that's ok by me - it's their butt. For me, the value of this thread would be to describe what works and what doesn't: give me a reason to pay the extra scratch for this saddle, or not.
#22
.


Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,769
Likes: 38
From: Rocket City, No'ala
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
Man, "fit" and "comfort" are so darned subjective. "Quality" may be less so, but everyone has to be on the same page about what constitutes "quality" - I'm certainly thinking craftsmanship, durability, functionality, etc. I've ridden all sorts of saddles over the years and have zeroed in on about three that best fit my personal needs for different riding situations and which have stood the test of time and use (mine.) But those are my own personal opinions and it took a lot of miles and hours in the saddle for me to reach those opinions. Other people will feel differently, and that's ok by me - it's their butt. For me, the value of this thread would be to describe what works and what doesn't: give me a reason to pay the extra scratch for this saddle, or not.
Sorefeet, just get a Lorica covered plastic saddle and be done with it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bone Machine
Classic & Vintage
10
09-10-17 06:15 PM
The Thin Man
Classic & Vintage
19
01-10-17 01:58 AM








