Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Cassette choice??

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Cassette choice??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-15 | 10:28 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 253
From: NE Ohio

Bikes: 1992 Serotta Colorado II,Co-Motion Speedster, Giant Escape Hybrid, 1977 Schwinn Super Le Tour

Cassette choice??

OK maybe I am being a bit anal but lets chalk that up to the winter blues! I need to select an 8 speed cassette for my 1984 Miyata 610 project. 11-32 or 11-34? As for the chain ring here is my current set-up which was stock. 52-46-28 I do have the rings to go 50-39-28. Also may consider changing the 28 to something a bit lower. Yeah I'm a wuss!
Thanks!
Tandem Tom is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-15 | 10:31 AM
  #2  
icepick_trotsky's Avatar
Aspiring curmudgeon
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 26
From: Saint Louis

Bikes: Guerciotti, Serotta, Gaulzetti

What derailleur are you using? You need to made sure it can handle that large cog and take up that much chain.
__________________
"Party on comrades" -- Lenin, probably
icepick_trotsky is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-15 | 10:59 AM
  #3  
ThermionicScott's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,643
From: CID

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

I'm not much of a gear-spacing weenie, but if you don't need the ~1.5" lower gear that a 28/34 provides over a 28/32, the 11-32 would give a little nicer spacing between ratios.

Since now is the time for "winter thought experiments", you might consider going even smaller on all the chainrings, since 50/11 is a pretty high gear in my estimation. A 48/38/28 can be built on a 130/74 triple for starters, and a 38T middle ring should shift to a smaller granny ring (like 24 or 26T) much nicer than your current 46T.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-15 | 11:23 AM
  #4  
John E's Avatar
feros ferio
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,411
Likes: 1,876
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Depending on your cog tooth progression, I would vote for 11-32 with 46-42-28 (half-step-and-granny) or 46-36-24 (1.5-step-and-granny).
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-15 | 11:27 AM
  #5  
due ruote's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,474
Likes: 559
50/11 is over 122 gear inches. If you can push that you're no wuss!

What are you using currently? What are the lowest and highest gears you ride with any frequency? I would start there as your outside parameters, then try for the maximum number of usable gears in between, with minimal fussy double shifting, and hopefully with a decent chainline.

Sheldon Brown's Bicycle Gear Calculator
due ruote is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-15 | 01:16 PM
  #6  
Dfrost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 550
From: Pacific Northwest

Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione

You might want to look closely at the middle gears (what you'll use on flattish roads), and optimize around that, ensuring that there's enough low end for the steep hills. I would also not bother with an 11t small cog if you're using a 50 or 52t big ring. 12 or even a 13t smallest cog would be plenty, IMHO, and probably give smaller steps in the middle of the cassette.

And since its 8-spd, the cogs are usually separable, so you could build any cassette you'd like. (I've got a drawer filled with every size Shimano cog made for 7/8-spd.) I'm currently using 12-14-16-17-19-21-24-28 (with 24-36-46 rings) on several bikes, and like that 1t spacing in the middle for subtle variations in speed/cadence on flat roads. Shifts just fine, despite what Shimano might say. The smaller 46t big ring gets used more, and allows the same subtle variations when the pace gets higher. I will be doing the STP one last time this summer and may use a 12-14-15-16-17-19-23-28 when I get stronger to deal with faster group rides. I would definitely suggest eliminating the second smallest cog, replacing it with a better cog size in the middle of the cassette. Just remember that the outer (smallest) cog should be one designated as "1st position".

You could give yourself plenty of options by picking up two different 8-spd cassettes that have different intermediate cogs (or even one 8- and one 7-spd - same width individual cogs), then assemble what you want using the 8-spd spacers. And you might find that what you want later when you're stronger will be different. BTW, the little bolts/pins connecting the cogs are not needed if you're using a hub with a steel freehub body. Also, Loose Screws has individual cogs in the smaller sizes.

https://www.loosescrews.com/index.cgi...d=666360626641

Last edited by Dfrost; 01-29-15 at 01:22 PM.
Dfrost is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fldaves
Fifty Plus (50+)
32
04-25-17 10:36 AM
budfan08
Road Cycling
51
03-17-17 08:56 AM
Wheever
Road Cycling
54
07-01-16 01:45 PM
scarleton
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
116
01-24-15 01:29 AM
heirfaus
Bicycle Mechanics
24
03-28-11 12:53 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.