Honked at for NOT running a red light
#26
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,863
Likes: 6
From: Washington, DC
Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?
#27
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN
Bikes: 05 Trek 5200, 07 Trek 520, 99 GT Karakoram, 08 Surly 1X1
#28
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,387
Likes: 3
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
#29
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN
Bikes: 05 Trek 5200, 07 Trek 520, 99 GT Karakoram, 08 Surly 1X1
#30
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,239
Likes: 8
From: Bay Area, Calif.
In UMD's case you also suggest he should have moved over to let the car by. But the car driver was trying to make a right turn onto a one-way street going the other way. Encouraging such a move wouldn't be wise and could easily lead to an accident.
#31
[QUOTE=BarracksSi;9811359]Two lane (that the OP was on) turning onto a FOUR LANE ROAD. The bus can make his turn without crossing much, if at all, into the (empty) lane to the OP's left. They do it all the time around here.
[QUOTE]
Why do all this to jepordize your safety. Simply wait for the red light. It was a huge bus not a compact. The OP could have done that maybe, but choose not to.
[QUOTE]
Why do all this to jepordize your safety. Simply wait for the red light. It was a huge bus not a compact. The OP could have done that maybe, but choose not to.
#32
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,863
Likes: 6
From: Washington, DC
Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?
#33
Okay everyone please stop this name calling and arguing nonsense. Take it to chat. https://www.bikeforums.net/webChattr.php
If this continues I will have to take care of the situation according to protocol.
Thank you.
Siu Blue Wind
Forum Admin.
If this continues I will have to take care of the situation according to protocol.
Thank you.
Siu Blue Wind
Forum Admin.
#34
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,387
Likes: 3
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
I thought it was an interesting story of a driver getting upset because I was "blocking" him in a manner similar to the OP, and the egg being on his face when he then tried to go the wrong way down the street. I'm sorry that you didn't realize that "turning right into oncoming traffic" on a one way street meant he was going the wrong way.
#35
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,863
Likes: 6
From: Washington, DC
Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?
It's really, really, REALLY simple. And, if you think I'm such an idiot, even I can understand it:
You're on a BIKE. You're not in a CAR. You're not even on a MOTORCYCLE. You can go just about goddamn EVERYWHERE without appreciably risking your own safety.
You have no reason to stake yourself into the pavement other than to be an *******.
You're on a BIKE. You're not in a CAR. You're not even on a MOTORCYCLE. You can go just about goddamn EVERYWHERE without appreciably risking your own safety.
You have no reason to stake yourself into the pavement other than to be an *******.
#36
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN
Bikes: 05 Trek 5200, 07 Trek 520, 99 GT Karakoram, 08 Surly 1X1
.....Or you could apply the protocol now and end this nonsense.
#37
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,387
Likes: 3
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
It's really, really, REALLY simple. And, if you think I'm such an idiot, even I can understand it:
You're on a BIKE. You're not in a CAR. You're not even on a MOTORCYCLE. You can go just about goddamn EVERYWHERE without appreciably risking your own safety.
You have no reason to stake yourself into the pavement other than to be an *******.
You're on a BIKE. You're not in a CAR. You're not even on a MOTORCYCLE. You can go just about goddamn EVERYWHERE without appreciably risking your own safety.
You have no reason to stake yourself into the pavement other than to be an *******.
#38
Crankenstein
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,037
Likes: 3
From: Spokane
Bikes: Novara Randonee (TankerBelle)
It's really, really, REALLY simple. And, if you think I'm such an idiot, even I can understand it:
You're on a BIKE. You're not in a CAR. You're not even on a MOTORCYCLE. You can go just about goddamn EVERYWHERE without appreciably risking your own safety.
You have no reason to stake yourself into the pavement other than to be an *******.
You're on a BIKE. You're not in a CAR. You're not even on a MOTORCYCLE. You can go just about goddamn EVERYWHERE without appreciably risking your own safety.
You have no reason to stake yourself into the pavement other than to be an *******.
You weren't there, you don't know what street it is, nor if there are parked cars near the intersection, if the lanes are narrow or wide (There's a few roads I ride on with 40+ foot lanes, talk about a wide outside lane!!!)
There are also streets I have to go on occasionally where there is room/time for ONE vehicle to turn per green light! (And if that vehicle is a bus, they wait for the light to turn red, THEN turn against the light)
There's no WAY I'm moving over to let a bus try to squeeze by me... they're dangerous enough when they're not trying a bone-head maneuver like that.
For the most part the city bus drivers around here are MUCH more professional than that. I'm always on edge around school buses, though!
#39
Thread closed.
My apologies to the OP that the childish bantering has ruined his thread.
Siu Blue Wind
Forum Admin.
My apologies to the OP that the childish bantering has ruined his thread.
Siu Blue Wind
Forum Admin.











