At 37 pounds this bike seems heavy and not my first choise for commuting?
#76
Devil's Advocate
+infinity I just don't see the appeal nor the cost. Nor what people are putting on their bikes to get them up to 55 lbs I mean, I can do that (and more) but it involves living off what I can carry on the bike for weeks at a time. I'm going to work, not crossing the country
And yeah, my country bikes do on occasion have to carry a few weeks of provisions. And in a way I guess you can say I am crossing the country, put over 4300 miles on my LWB last season, though all just in the Mid Hudson Valley.
Would never fork over the dough for something like that Breezer, but then I'm quite a tight wad-- reason why I go car-free in the first place. Still I can see its place for someone who doesn't live in very hilly terrain and to whom price is no obstacle. Different spokes for different folks.
Last edited by andychrist; 04-20-11 at 02:45 PM.
#77
Anachronist.
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 298
Bikes: 1981 Schwinn Le Tour, 2010 Motobecane Sprint
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
These bikes look great and I understand what and why you have them. But there's still a place for a Breezer, imo. In fact, I'd argue that it's an untapped market that I hope grows a lot.
What if you're just using a bike for utility? Just for biking to work and shopping/running errands. What if you're primarily biking in your own town--and your typical trip is 1-4 miles, for example?
Why have an exposed chain? Why an exposed transmission that requires tune ups? Why strap your pant leg at all? Why have a triple chainring?
I love my IGH and chainguard. And I love biking around town instead of driving my steel cage. Also, I use my Breezer on bad weather days, like this morning when it rained the whole way in, for my 5 mile commute. Sure, I'd rather use my road bike, which is much faster--but it's not nearly as functional. A transportation bike like the Breezer or the Novara Transfer, which we saw some nice pics recently on another thread, is functional, low maintenance, and a means to change a lifestyle.
What if you're just using a bike for utility? Just for biking to work and shopping/running errands. What if you're primarily biking in your own town--and your typical trip is 1-4 miles, for example?
Why have an exposed chain? Why an exposed transmission that requires tune ups? Why strap your pant leg at all? Why have a triple chainring?
I love my IGH and chainguard. And I love biking around town instead of driving my steel cage. Also, I use my Breezer on bad weather days, like this morning when it rained the whole way in, for my 5 mile commute. Sure, I'd rather use my road bike, which is much faster--but it's not nearly as functional. A transportation bike like the Breezer or the Novara Transfer, which we saw some nice pics recently on another thread, is functional, low maintenance, and a means to change a lifestyle.
I get around just fine on my road bikes, but my family doesn't understand why I would ride something with drop bars and a skinny saddle everywhere I go. They all want bikes with squishy saddles, upright positions, and fat tires. If I set my Le Tour and the Breezer in front of most of my family and friends and told them they had to commute every day for a week on one of them the Breezer would win 90% of the time. This isn't a bad thing. The people who buy the Breezer are going to use it, and that is more people on bikes. I don't see how any part of that is a bad thing.
#78
Descends like a rock
That's what dumbfounds me. For a little more money you can get a lot more bike (a cargo bike) at the same weight. And, for less money, you can get the same bike (minus the gee whiz hub) at less weight.
Heck, get your decent lighter bike and one of those new surly trailers. Throw 300lbs of bricks on it and you can shame andychrist.
Heck, get your decent lighter bike and one of those new surly trailers. Throw 300lbs of bricks on it and you can shame andychrist.
I know its hard to believe, but a lot of the appeal to the Breezer is the styling.
#79
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,101
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
13 Posts
That's what dumbfounds me. For a little more money you can get a lot more bike (a cargo bike) at the same weight. And, for less money, you can get the same bike (minus the gee whiz hub) at less weight.
Heck, get your decent lighter bike and one of those new surly trailers. Throw 300lbs of bricks on it and you can shame andychrist.
Heck, get your decent lighter bike and one of those new surly trailers. Throw 300lbs of bricks on it and you can shame andychrist.
#82
Patient Malthusian
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 70
Bikes: Dahon - Curve SL, and a Xootr Scooter Mg
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Coming to this thread late but it seems odd that the OP v70cat and cyccommute single the Breezer Infinity out for it's weight. This is no ordinary 37lb bike. The N360 hub is a huge improvement over the N171 previous version. This hub will give a 360% range with butter smooth shifting that is ALWAYS in gear.
My 2011 Novara Transfer in large size is about the exact same weight as the Infinity. Mine just has a 7 spd Nexus (less weight), no ring lock (less weight), 700c wheels (more weight) and steel frame (more weight). Otherwise, the two bikes are comparable. I do notice the weight going up and down stairs. But actually, it is the size of the bike (with 700c wheels) that is more challenging for me to negotiate through 4 flights of narrow stairwells with 90 degree turns every half flight - than the weight. The 26" wheels of the Breezer make it a highly maneuverable yet fully equipped urban commuter.
Aesthetically, derailleurs are to IGH's as male sexual anatomy is to that of the female. The male stuff is external and therefore visible but it ain't as pretty to look at. The IGH gives you a nice smooth drivetrain that shifts with feminine grace. Males are built for speed, women are built for comfort.
Cycling where cyccommute does in very hilly parts of Colorado, I can well appreciate his preference for the lighter-weight efficiency of a derailleur. But for most people commuting in most parts of the country, I think a more reliable drivetrain means greater efficiency through all seasons.
Don't get me wrong - derailleurs aren't going anywhere. They have a secure place in cyclists hearts. But even in NYC where people have tons of disposable income, the bike shops cater mostly to spandex speed freaks, fixie hipsters and mountain bike gear geeks. Judging by the selection, you'd think K-12 was a 30-minute ride away on commuter rail. IGH's have been marginalized for decades in the States. It's about time the many recent improvements to IGH's started showing up in the US bike market.
Suburban sprawl has accustomed even hard core bike enthusiasts to the notion that you need light weight and speed because everything is so spread out. What's often overlooked is the assumption that one need live at extreme distance from their place of employment. A 20 mile commute by car is typical. To ride the same distance and back everyday by bike suggests an over-attachment to a lifestyle that only makes sense where every adult owns their personal car. When things are closer together, you start realizing that having less space for the stuff you own makes the world a more convenient place to get around. But you hardly need Manhattan densities to achieve bikeability. What you do need is a critical mass of cyclists to make drivers more aware and repectful of bikers use of the roads. Everyone benefits when roads make room for both cars and protected bike lanes, and bike shops make room for both derailleur and IGH-equipped bikes. Monocultures lead to inefficiency, waste and stagnation.
My 2011 Novara Transfer in large size is about the exact same weight as the Infinity. Mine just has a 7 spd Nexus (less weight), no ring lock (less weight), 700c wheels (more weight) and steel frame (more weight). Otherwise, the two bikes are comparable. I do notice the weight going up and down stairs. But actually, it is the size of the bike (with 700c wheels) that is more challenging for me to negotiate through 4 flights of narrow stairwells with 90 degree turns every half flight - than the weight. The 26" wheels of the Breezer make it a highly maneuverable yet fully equipped urban commuter.
Aesthetically, derailleurs are to IGH's as male sexual anatomy is to that of the female. The male stuff is external and therefore visible but it ain't as pretty to look at. The IGH gives you a nice smooth drivetrain that shifts with feminine grace. Males are built for speed, women are built for comfort.
Cycling where cyccommute does in very hilly parts of Colorado, I can well appreciate his preference for the lighter-weight efficiency of a derailleur. But for most people commuting in most parts of the country, I think a more reliable drivetrain means greater efficiency through all seasons.
Don't get me wrong - derailleurs aren't going anywhere. They have a secure place in cyclists hearts. But even in NYC where people have tons of disposable income, the bike shops cater mostly to spandex speed freaks, fixie hipsters and mountain bike gear geeks. Judging by the selection, you'd think K-12 was a 30-minute ride away on commuter rail. IGH's have been marginalized for decades in the States. It's about time the many recent improvements to IGH's started showing up in the US bike market.
Suburban sprawl has accustomed even hard core bike enthusiasts to the notion that you need light weight and speed because everything is so spread out. What's often overlooked is the assumption that one need live at extreme distance from their place of employment. A 20 mile commute by car is typical. To ride the same distance and back everyday by bike suggests an over-attachment to a lifestyle that only makes sense where every adult owns their personal car. When things are closer together, you start realizing that having less space for the stuff you own makes the world a more convenient place to get around. But you hardly need Manhattan densities to achieve bikeability. What you do need is a critical mass of cyclists to make drivers more aware and repectful of bikers use of the roads. Everyone benefits when roads make room for both cars and protected bike lanes, and bike shops make room for both derailleur and IGH-equipped bikes. Monocultures lead to inefficiency, waste and stagnation.
Last edited by axel; 04-20-11 at 06:46 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jyl
Commuting
49
11-28-12 10:09 AM