Thoughts on Thorn Resistant Tubes
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Thoughts on Thorn Resistant Tubes
Do you use them? I think they do help, but I don't know if it's really enough difference than a regular tube to justify the cost AND the weight factor. I got one for my 29er and it's sooo heavy and thick.
#2
The Infractionator
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 3
From: Rochester, NY
Bikes: Classic road bikes: 1986 Cannondale, 1978 Trek
If you live some place where goatheads are common (thankfully I don't), then you have to decide whether you're going to ride thick, heavy, dead-feeling tires with a regular tube, or regular tires with a thick, heavy, dead-feeling thorn-proof tube...
#3
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
that's a good word for it..dead feeling. Even though their a lots of thorns in my area (woods) I might just use the TRT for a spare!
#4
I used them...once.
I used thorn resistant tubes once. I figured they would be good for my commute as I have seen cars purposly throw glass bottles in the cycle lane right in front of me.
My guess is they work. I only got 1 ride on them before I pulled each 300 gram per tube and chucked it in the trash. They'd work better if they were solid. Why even bother with air at that point? The ride was awful, slow, hard, wooden, and lethargic.
I switched to Gatorskin hardshells, & Mr. Tuffy liners. I now have 7 ,(no, 8?) bikes and they run from 23, 25, 32c tires, ultra-light & regular liners, regular & ultra-light inner-tubes. Any/all above combinations work better and ride better than those thorn resistant tubes.
I've had 1 flat in 5000 miles that wasn't due to my direct installation error. I've even used a roadside metal kitchen fork to dig glass, staples, and roofing nails out where the liner is plainly visible or the debris easily penetrated further than the thorn resistant rubber tube would have been thick, had it been installed. Yet, still got no flats even with ultra-lite tube & ultra-lite liner combination because the liner prevented tube penetration.
The Gator Hardshell and Mr. Tuffy is a hard combination to beat.
If ever you are in doubt, buy a liner 1 size wider than the tire you are using to help with some sidewall protection
My guess is they work. I only got 1 ride on them before I pulled each 300 gram per tube and chucked it in the trash. They'd work better if they were solid. Why even bother with air at that point? The ride was awful, slow, hard, wooden, and lethargic.
I switched to Gatorskin hardshells, & Mr. Tuffy liners. I now have 7 ,(no, 8?) bikes and they run from 23, 25, 32c tires, ultra-light & regular liners, regular & ultra-light inner-tubes. Any/all above combinations work better and ride better than those thorn resistant tubes.
I've had 1 flat in 5000 miles that wasn't due to my direct installation error. I've even used a roadside metal kitchen fork to dig glass, staples, and roofing nails out where the liner is plainly visible or the debris easily penetrated further than the thorn resistant rubber tube would have been thick, had it been installed. Yet, still got no flats even with ultra-lite tube & ultra-lite liner combination because the liner prevented tube penetration.
The Gator Hardshell and Mr. Tuffy is a hard combination to beat.
If ever you are in doubt, buy a liner 1 size wider than the tire you are using to help with some sidewall protection
Last edited by base2; 04-25-17 at 07:07 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 935
Likes: 46
From: Las Vegas, NV
Bikes: '04 LeMond Buenos Aires, '82 Bianchi Nuova Racing, De Rosa SLX, Bridgestone MB-1, Guerciotti TSX, Torpado Aelle, LeMond Tourmalet 853, Bridgestone Radac
A bike I bought on Cragslist had thorn resistant tubes in the tires. One had a slow leak but I kept the other in a rear wheel I'd sometimes do some commuting on. I haven't used the wheels in awhile but that rear feels like there's lead in there! I'm no lightweight so I don't care about my bikes being featherweight, but that much extra rolling weight really does kill the ride.
#7
I used thorn resistant tubes once. I figured they would be good for my commute as I have seen cars purposly throw glass bottles in the cycle lane right in front of me.
My guess is they work. I only got 1 ride on them before I pulled each 300 gram per tube and chucked it in the trash. They'd work better if they were solid. Why even bother with air at that point? The ride was awful, slow, hard, wooden, and lethargic.
My guess is they work. I only got 1 ride on them before I pulled each 300 gram per tube and chucked it in the trash. They'd work better if they were solid. Why even bother with air at that point? The ride was awful, slow, hard, wooden, and lethargic.
When they arrived, I was shocked at the size and weight.
I never did install them.
They just sat on the shelf for a while until I unloaded them on eBay.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,239
Likes: 8
From: Bay Area, Calif.
The extra weight is obvious but actually the main drawback of these tubes is the added rolling resistance. When the tire is rolling the rubber in these tubes has to be flexed in the area of the contact patch and that requires energy. I could see using them for a short commute in an area with lots of potential for flats (goat heads, other thorns, glass, etc.) where the added time from riding slower would be minimal and much more acceptable than sometimes having a longer delay to fix a flat.
#10
This is exactly what happened to me, after a series of flats on my MTB in winter. They came in boxes the weight and size of large bricks. Still have them on the shelf. I ride MTBs and Cruisers so I am no weight snob...
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,720
Likes: 111
From: North of Boston
Bikes: Kona Dawg, Surly 1x1, Karate Monkey, Rockhopper, Crosscheck , Burley Runabout,
Or just run tubeless and solve those issues,.
#13
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
I used thorn resistant tubes once. I figured they would be good for my commute as I have seen cars purposly throw glass bottles in the cycle lane right in front of me.
My guess is they work. I only got 1 ride on them before I pulled each 300 gram per tube and chucked it in the trash. They'd work better if they were solid. Why even bother with air at that point? The ride was awful, slow, hard, wooden, and lethargic.
I switched to Gatorskin hardshells, & Mr. Tuffy liners. I now have 7 ,(no, 8?) bikes and they run from 23, 25, 32c tires, ultra-light & regular liners, regular & ultra-light inner-tubes. Any/all above combinations work better and ride better than those thorn resistant tubes.
I've had 1 flat in 5000 miles that wasn't due to my direct installation error. I've even used a roadside metal kitchen fork to dig glass, staples, and roofing nails out where the liner is plainly visible or the debris easily penetrated further than the thorn resistant rubber tube would have been thick, had it been installed. Yet, still got no flats even with ultra-lite tube & ultra-lite liner combination because the liner prevented tube penetration.
The Gator Hardshell and Mr. Tuffy is a hard combination to beat.
If ever you are in doubt, buy a liner 1 size wider than the tire you are using to help with some sidewall protection
My guess is they work. I only got 1 ride on them before I pulled each 300 gram per tube and chucked it in the trash. They'd work better if they were solid. Why even bother with air at that point? The ride was awful, slow, hard, wooden, and lethargic.
I switched to Gatorskin hardshells, & Mr. Tuffy liners. I now have 7 ,(no, 8?) bikes and they run from 23, 25, 32c tires, ultra-light & regular liners, regular & ultra-light inner-tubes. Any/all above combinations work better and ride better than those thorn resistant tubes.
I've had 1 flat in 5000 miles that wasn't due to my direct installation error. I've even used a roadside metal kitchen fork to dig glass, staples, and roofing nails out where the liner is plainly visible or the debris easily penetrated further than the thorn resistant rubber tube would have been thick, had it been installed. Yet, still got no flats even with ultra-lite tube & ultra-lite liner combination because the liner prevented tube penetration.
The Gator Hardshell and Mr. Tuffy is a hard combination to beat.
If ever you are in doubt, buy a liner 1 size wider than the tire you are using to help with some sidewall protection
#14
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 330
From: Fernandina Beach FL
Bikes: Vintage Japanese Bicycles, Tange, Ishiwata, Kuwahara
I've been running TPT's in my vintage steel Centurion Ironman. The tubes are pretty small & fit inside the 700x25mm tires well. I'm satisfied. Haven't had a flat in over 3000 miles. Really like them when I'm approaching 40mph on a steep downhill. I'm running ordinary Michelin Dynamic sport tires inflated to 100psi. I really can't tell the difference between the TPT's & regular tubes. Don't understand why so many on these boards have such a low opinion of them.
#15
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,667
Likes: 2,411
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Specialized Rockhopper, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V
I use Mr. Tuffy tire liners. Then you can use a supple tire and a supple tube.
#16
The Infractionator
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 3
From: Rochester, NY
Bikes: Classic road bikes: 1986 Cannondale, 1978 Trek
OK, make that choice #3: Spend a lot of money for a stiff, hard to set up tubeless tire, then go back to the first 2 choices (along with dealing with a bigger mess inside your tire than you were expecting..) when the inevitable flat finally happens.....
300g for a TUBE********** Holy *****! A HEAVY tubular weighs that much, and that includes tire, tube, valve, tape and stitching!!!
My guess is they work. I only got 1 ride on them before I pulled each 300 gram per tube and chucked it in the trash.
#17
Disco Infiltrator




Joined: May 2013
Posts: 15,350
Likes: 3,551
From: Folsom CA
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
I used both resistant (double thickness) and "proof" tubes (the kind that come in a box as big as a shoe box) as a kid in the desert. With Marathons or tubeless available, I wouldn't start again.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
"Well, well!" said Holmes, impatiently. "A good cyclist does not need a high road. The moor is intersected with paths and the moon is at the full."
Genesis 49:16-17
"Well, well!" said Holmes, impatiently. "A good cyclist does not need a high road. The moor is intersected with paths and the moon is at the full."
Last edited by Darth Lefty; 04-26-17 at 03:02 PM.
#18
I forget the exact number of grams. But I do remember that the combination of ultra-light liner & a 67 gram tube came out exactly the same as a standard weight tube by it self. Given the extra flat protection of the liner, it seemed a "no-brainer" Theory being if it gets through the purpose built liner, any tube in there wouldn't have made a difference anyway.
I've long ago lost track of which bike has what, so if that tells you anything about ride quality.
No matter the combination 4 ounces per bike (worst case IIRC) was preferrable to 300 grams per tube!
I've long ago lost track of which bike has what, so if that tells you anything about ride quality.
No matter the combination 4 ounces per bike (worst case IIRC) was preferrable to 300 grams per tube!
#19
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
I forget the exact number of grams. But I do remember that the combination of ultra-light liner & a 67 gram tube came out exactly the same as a standard weight tube by it self. Given the extra flat protection of the liner, it seemed a "no-brainer" Theory being if it gets through the purpose built liner, any tube in there wouldn't have made a difference anyway.
I've long ago lost track of which bike has what, so if that tells you anything about ride quality.
No matter the combination 4 ounces per bike (worst case IIRC) was preferrable to 300 grams per tube!
I've long ago lost track of which bike has what, so if that tells you anything about ride quality.
No matter the combination 4 ounces per bike (worst case IIRC) was preferrable to 300 grams per tube!
#20
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
I've been running TPT's in my vintage steel Centurion Ironman. The tubes are pretty small & fit inside the 700x25mm tires well. I'm satisfied. Haven't had a flat in over 3000 miles. Really like them when I'm approaching 40mph on a steep downhill. I'm running ordinary Michelin Dynamic sport tires inflated to 100psi. I really can't tell the difference between the TPT's & regular tubes. Don't understand why so many on these boards have such a low opinion of them.
#21
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 11
From: Ottawa,ON,Canada
Bikes: Schwinn Miranda 1990, Giant TCX 2 2012
Same here. I bought Continental Grand Prix 4000S II tires and Vittoria Lite Road inner tubes yesterday (awaiting delivery). Our bike paths and road curbs are not cleaned often and the more protection I can put between my tube and the debris, the better. Just ordered a pair of Mr Tuffy from Amazon.
#22
I use the thorn resistant tubes. For a spare I carry a non thorn resistant tube, because it is lighter. Sure you can tell the difference when you hold them in your hand. But I can't tell the difference riding on them.
Do they work? I dunno. I don't keep track of miles per tube, miles between flats, tube types, etc. But I use the heavier ones just because. When I have a flat there is usually more than one item thru the tire; small staples, glass, thorn points, etc. But only one puncture in the tube.
Do they work? I dunno. I don't keep track of miles per tube, miles between flats, tube types, etc. But I use the heavier ones just because. When I have a flat there is usually more than one item thru the tire; small staples, glass, thorn points, etc. But only one puncture in the tube.
#23
Clark W. Griswold




Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 18,448
Likes: 6,758
From: ,location, location
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
I hate 'em especially for thinner tires for wider stuff they are still crap but at least easier to work with. I prefer to keep my tires properly inflated and do my best to avoid things that will flat me and good quality tires. If I am running through areas of higher flat likelihood I will probably run Gatorskins or GatorHardshells from Conti and of course the wider the better.
Mr. Tuffys are a horrible idea, a random piece of material with rough edges that will move around between your tube and tire and can cause flats?! Why go through the trouble. I would rather have the thorn resistant tubes in that case at least the tubes will stay in place pretty well.
Mr. Tuffys are a horrible idea, a random piece of material with rough edges that will move around between your tube and tire and can cause flats?! Why go through the trouble. I would rather have the thorn resistant tubes in that case at least the tubes will stay in place pretty well.
#24
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,667
Likes: 2,411
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Specialized Rockhopper, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V
After using Mr. Tuffy's tire liners for seven years of 18 miles of daily commuting plus occasional weekend rides, I have to disagree.
#25
Mad bike riding scientist




Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,209
Likes: 6,286
From: Denver, CO
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mr. Tuffys are a horrible idea, a random piece of material with rough edges that will move around between your tube and tire and can cause flats?! Why go through the trouble. I would rather have the thorn resistant tubes in that case at least the tubes will stay in place pretty well.
They work well enough that many tire manufacturers put the liner under the tread. It's the same material.
"Thorn proof" inner tubes are just heavy. I'd rather use Slime...and I hate Slime!
Seven years...what a newb?
I've been using them for more than 25 years in the heart of goathead country. I've been on a ride with 3 other people where we had 27 flats between us. One poor person got 20, the guy running tubeless had 6, my wife had one (in the tire I forgot to put the Tuffys back in) and I got none...with Tuffys in both tires.Don't get me wrong, I can get, and still do, get flats but the Tuffys slow them down.
__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!





