Is SRAM any good?
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: state college, PA
Bikes: xo-1, riv atlantis, witcomb fixie, on-one inbred, bridgestone mb-1 w/ drops, bianchi reparto corse mtn bike, trek 650b'd touring bike
its as solid as shimano, generally speaking. in fact sram chains and cassettes are what i prefer to run, and i run thier mtn group on my giant trance.
#5
I think he's talking about the new SRAM stuff below the X.7 level on the Hardrock Sport.
I was actually wondering that myself.
Anybody have it?
I was actually wondering that myself.
Anybody have it?
#7
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Bikes: GT chucker 1.0
srams are good but any thing from x-5 down are heeps bad. i had an x-5 on my bike and i bumped it the slitest bit and it got a crack in it. then when i went on a jump about 1 metre big it snaped right off. so i took it in and got an x-7. the guy at the shop sad it was partly made of palsitic
#9
Bike Junkie
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,625
Likes: 40
From: South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Roubaix, Giant OCR-C, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 84 Nishiki Medalist
My LBS replaced my cassette and chain on my 05 Rockhopper with SRAM equipment. I really like their chains. I've been told the SRAM cassettes don't last as long as Shimano, but so far I have not noticed any difference.
__________________
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
#10
Still kicking.


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey
Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.
Originally Posted by samster143
Shimano....there is no equal.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: Waterford/Trumbull, CT
Bikes: Iron Horse Rogue / Mongoose ALD Pro / Fuji Sunfire
Originally Posted by airpressure
I usually always have shimano and I have nothing bad to say about there parts.
#14
It is mainly a preference like Riles said.
For me I like SRAM derailleurs over Shimano, but I don't hate the Shimano ones. I like Shimano cassettes and crank sets over SRAM but I dont hate SRAM ones, you get my drift.
For me I like SRAM derailleurs over Shimano, but I don't hate the Shimano ones. I like Shimano cassettes and crank sets over SRAM but I dont hate SRAM ones, you get my drift.
#19
B*ck From Th* D**d
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 8
From: Lower Mainland, BC
Bikes: 2015 Kona Process 153
I have Sram X.7 on my bike, it is very nice. Very crisp shifting.
#20
Wood Licker


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,966
Likes: 2
From: Whistler,BC
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Just for unification of parts in case of replacement I run sram. I hated Shimanos move to rapid rise (personal preference) and dual control shifter/brakes. So I discontinued buying them. They have backed up a bit and returned to standard shifters (good on them to recognize a mistake) but I have all sram stuff now and intend to stay that way. I do find a difference with the 1x1 shifting as well.
#22
Originally Posted by samster143
Shimano....there is no equal.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
#23
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: Santa Cruz
Bikes: doesnt matter. just ride.
i prefer sram. i cant stand how shimano refuses to limit the forward motion on their rear derailleurs. for 07 all they did was put a little pad there. i also think sram shiftes are much more solid and dependable
#24
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Originally Posted by roccobike
I've been told the SRAM cassettes don't last as long as Shimano, but so far I have not noticed any difference.
However, with the XT 4/5-arm design, powerful/heavy/"pedal-mashing-non-spinning" riders can easily rip cogs "outwards" in certain gear combos. I've had this happen to me 3 times on XT cassettes. 5 or so SRAM cassettes later and I've never had the problem, but I can say they wear slightly faster.
And last but not least, XT cassettes weigh less because of this same 4/5-arm design. We're talking about 75g lighter than SRAM pg970.
In the end, it's personal preference and experience.
#25
Dirt-riding heretic
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 8
From: Gig Harbor, WA
Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9
Back when I was still mountain biking I rode a Yeti ARC with a SRAM X.0 drivetrain, and I can say that it's the best drivetrain I've ever ridden in terms of performance and reliability, road or mountain. Never lost performance, even when it was gunked-up, and SRAM's chains were far more reliable. I built up a beater bike with a combo of Shimano and SRAM parts (Rocket shifters, XT RD, Deore FD, LX crank) and that worked pretty well too, but nothing like the crispness of X.0 (I hope not for the $$$ difference...
)
I'm not sure about the performance of the lower-end stuff in an all-SRAM drivetrain, but I have yet to buy a SRAM part that hasn't served me faithfully.
)I'm not sure about the performance of the lower-end stuff in an all-SRAM drivetrain, but I have yet to buy a SRAM part that hasn't served me faithfully.
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."




