Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Wide wheels

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Wide wheels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-23, 07:40 PM
  #1  
Learning the ropes
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Indiana
Posts: 16

Bikes: 1983 Schwinn Le Tour, 2012 Specialized Venge, Cannondale SuperX

Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Wide wheels

Why do people opt for wider rims (e.g. Reynolds assault's) instead of older designs that have spokes that go almost all the way to the tire (like Shimano WH-RS500)? I tried out the Reynolds Assaults, and while they were faster on a straightaway, whenever I had a crosswind AT ALL, it was like I was riding a sail and I felt like I was working harder to keep the bike upright than I was working to get a reasonable speed. What am I missing? Do the gains somehow outweigh the cons?
Bikealangelo is offline  
Old 07-25-23, 07:49 PM
  #2  
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,773

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Liked 9,720 Times in 4,487 Posts
That’s not wide, that’s “deep section.” More aerodynamic so faster, but might be heavier and tougher in crosswinds.

Wider means rim width not depth.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Likes For datlas:
Old 07-25-23, 08:13 PM
  #3  
Learning the ropes
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Indiana
Posts: 16

Bikes: 1983 Schwinn Le Tour, 2012 Specialized Venge, Cannondale SuperX

Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
That’s not wide, that’s “deep section.” More aerodynamic so faster, but might be heavier and tougher in crosswinds.

Wider means rim width not depth.
Thanks for clarifying, so in specific instances it makes sense?
Bikealangelo is offline  
Old 07-25-23, 09:01 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,843

Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem

Liked 1,058 Times in 743 Posts
Rim design matters for how well the wind effects things but I have my 12yo daughter on 32mm deep rims on her road bike and 45mm deep on her track bike and even in stiff winds on the track has never struggled to control her bike or riding along the ocean with high wind speeds. At only 41mm deep I wouldn't think they'd be effected that badly unless they're not a newer shape or you're riding in really high winds. Basically though, unless you have a tailwind that's faster than you're going, you're always riding into a wind and an aero profile rim when specced with a proper size tire will always help you save time/energy. When companies speak of watts saved at 40kph/25mph which seems like an absurd speed for the average rider to maintain, they're actually referring to combined speed, if you're doing 15mph into a 10mph wind you're hit their 25mph, so they really do have the benefits reputable companies claim for the average rider.
Russ Roth is offline  
Old 07-25-23, 09:48 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
tempocyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Australia
Posts: 869

Bikes: 2002 Trek 5200 (US POSTAL), 2020 Canyon Aeroad SL

Liked 716 Times in 351 Posts
Originally Posted by Bikealangelo
What am I missing? Do the gains somehow outweigh the cons?

In most circumstances, yes. Plus they look hot. 😎
tempocyclist is offline  
Likes For tempocyclist:
Old 07-26-23, 06:26 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 815
Liked 310 Times in 168 Posts
Look Bikealangelo, just because you have the coolest username... okay, that's all I got.

Weight can a factor too - in that lighter AND newer riders might feel uncomfortable on deep section wheels.
But yeah, there are pros and cons...
Cons:
- can be heavier
- are more expensive
- can be a factor in strong cross winds
Pros
- faster
- look cool
- look cool (worth mentioning twice)
Zaskar is offline  
Old 07-26-23, 07:24 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,521

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Liked 9,462 Times in 4,673 Posts
When it comes to cross-winds, rim profile is important. My Reynolds Assaults were significantly worse in cross-winds than my current Zipp 303S; I don't really feel much wheel push, at all, with the Zipps; it's less prominent than on the frame/my body. With the Reynolds, it's was like an invisible hand nudging my bars.
WhyFi is offline  
Likes For WhyFi:
Old 07-26-23, 10:35 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 815
Liked 310 Times in 168 Posts
I'm curious WhyFi - what do you weigh and which Assaults did you have? I'm about 180lbs and love my 42mm Assaults - haven't felt any adverse effects from the wind.
Zaskar is offline  
Old 07-26-23, 10:44 AM
  #9  
Habitual User
 
Eric F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,699

Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2022 Trek Supercaliber, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP

Liked 9,031 Times in 4,234 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
When it comes to cross-winds, rim profile is important. My Reynolds Assaults were significantly worse in cross-winds than my current Zipp 303S; I don't really feel much wheel push, at all, with the Zipps; it's less prominent than on the frame/my body. With the Reynolds, it's was like an invisible hand nudging my bars.
My older Shimano C50s are like that. My current Enves, not much at all.
__________________
Platypus gravelus.
Eric F is offline  
Old 07-26-23, 11:29 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
msu2001la's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,902
Liked 1,500 Times in 879 Posts
I've noticed crosswinds buffeting me around a few times while on my Zipp 303S, but only in some pretty extreme conditions, and even then it's relatively minor.
I have a shallower depth wheelset and I've never felt the need to swap due to wind conditions.
msu2001la is offline  
Old 07-26-23, 12:49 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,521

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Liked 9,462 Times in 4,673 Posts
Originally Posted by Zaskar
I'm curious WhyFi - what do you weigh and which Assaults did you have? I'm about 180lbs and love my 42mm Assaults - haven't felt any adverse effects from the wind.
Roughly the same weight. They were a disc brake model, the SLG, I think? This was before they went to the wider internal width, so 17mm internal, maybe 25mm external.
WhyFi is offline  
Old 07-26-23, 01:03 PM
  #12  
serious cyclist
 
Bah Humbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147

Bikes: S1, R2, P2

Liked 3,685 Times in 2,028 Posts
Experience also affects the perception of the wind - at first it feels a lot stronger than it will after a season of adjusting to it. Shape still affects it, though.
Bah Humbug is offline  
Old 07-26-23, 03:04 PM
  #13  
Super-duper Genius
 
Broctoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Muskrat Springs, Utah
Posts: 1,748
Liked 1,044 Times in 532 Posts
Something else worth mentioning in a discussion of deep rims is the shape. Early attempts at really aerodynamically efficient rims were V-shaped, with flat sidewalls and a fairly sharp apex. Later, engineers learned that it's better to make more of a U-shape, or even to bulge the sidewalls out slightly wider than the bead area. Today's fastest (and most expensive) rims have little bumps around the circumference of the apex, the area where the spokes enter. These are claimed to prevent a stall, or area of low pressure next to the rim, which could add a little inefficiency.

I'll add my own opinion with this... Among all the wheels I have for my several bikes, there's only one carbon set. They are Reynolds rims. I don't know the model, but they're ten or fifteen years old I think, with really nice but heavy hubs. They're my deepest rims (although not much deeper than some 20 year old alloys I have) and they're V-shaped and a bit on the heavy side. I don't have any illusions that they are faster than some much less "fancy" wheels. They *might* be no better than some really old-tech but lightweight box section rims, for the kind of riding I'm doing. I still love them. They look cool, they make me feel like I'll be able to ride fast, they're more than tough enough for the use I put them to. And did I mention they look cool?
Broctoon is offline  
Old 07-26-23, 11:53 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 2,049
Liked 499 Times in 363 Posts
They look really fast
LarrySellerz is offline  
Old 07-27-23, 10:03 AM
  #15  
Super-duper Genius
 
Broctoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Muskrat Springs, Utah
Posts: 1,748
Liked 1,044 Times in 532 Posts
Originally Posted by LarrySellerz
They look really fast
People will laugh, but this is a thing.

I've made no attempts in this forum to hide the fact that I'm a Cat 6 racer. When you're trying to beat a guy who probably doesn't know he's in a race, image is important. Psychology makes a real difference in athletic performance. I show up with my coolest looking bike and my favorite bib and jersey, and I'm ready to push myself hard. With lesser gear, I'll have an excuse to underperform.

You can start making fun of me now. (Hides under desk)
Broctoon is offline  
Old 07-27-23, 10:11 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 595

Bikes: Scott Foil RC, Winspace T1550

Liked 212 Times in 137 Posts
Originally Posted by Bikealangelo
Why do people opt for wider rims (e.g. Reynolds assault's) instead of older designs that have spokes that go almost all the way to the tire (like Shimano WH-RS500)? I tried out the Reynolds Assaults, and while they were faster on a straightaway, whenever I had a crosswind AT ALL, it was like I was riding a sail and I felt like I was working harder to keep the bike upright than I was working to get a reasonable speed. What am I missing? Do the gains somehow outweigh the cons?
You mean deep, but it really depends on the rider and where and when they ride. This is why personally I think a mid-tier depth wheel at 40mm-45mm makes the most sense, however there are some 35mm-38mm wheels that perform just as good aerodynamically as some 50mm ones yet will not have as much as a crosswind penalty.

My suggestion is to go staggered. My favorite wheelset to this day is the 2023 Winspace D45 where you have a 46mm wheel upfront and 54mm at the back, this allow for more control upfront while still getting pretty good aero gains.

Last edited by Jrasero; 07-27-23 at 11:08 AM.
Jrasero is offline  
Old 07-27-23, 10:21 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver area (Ken Caryl Valley)
Posts: 1,803

Bikes: 2022 Moots RCS, 2014 BMC SLR01 DA Mech, 2020 Santa Cruz Stigmata, Ibis Ripmo, Trek Top Fuel, Specialized Levo SL, Norco Bigfoot VLT

Liked 183 Times in 119 Posts
My newest wheels are not really deep at maybe 40mm but that is about as deep as I want for here in Colorado. It is pretty unaffected by crosswinds and similar to my 30mm alloy rims. I woudl not want deeper for two reason- crosswind stability and stiffness. Deeper carbon wheels tend to be stiffer/harsher and the crosswind stability is reduced. If I loved in flat terrain where it isn't too windy, I'd maybe step up to the 404s or keep 404s as a 2nd wheelset, but nothing deeper. The 303s are very comfy and light wheels and I bet the 404s are heavier and stiffer/less compliant.
Chandne is offline  
Old 07-27-23, 10:21 AM
  #18  
I don't know.
 
RB1-luvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Meriden, CT
Posts: 2,273

Bikes: '90 B'stone RB-1, '92 B'stone RB-2, '89 SuperGo Access Comp, '03 Access 69er, '23 Trek 520, '14 Ritchey Road Logic, '09 Kestrel Evoke, '08 Windsor Tourist, '17 Surly Wednesday, '89 Centurion Accordo, '15 CruX, '17 Ridley X-Night, '89 Marinoni

Liked 1,092 Times in 556 Posts
I'll admit I only bought them for the hotness. I wanted hot wheels for decades. When I built my Ritchey (had it built), I went for it. Since 2016 when I got the bike, I can remember maybe a half dozen times when wind was a small issue. Maybe cuz I opted for a less deep v-section for the front.

RB1-luvr is offline  
Likes For RB1-luvr:
Old 07-27-23, 11:18 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 595

Bikes: Scott Foil RC, Winspace T1550

Liked 212 Times in 137 Posts
I should also note while deep wheels will be faster it also really depends on your power. I am smaller rider and average 140W-150W, so nothing amazing and for me to get a heavier 65mm spun up to speed especially in a lot of stop and go cycling was tiresome. People will debate all day about rotational weight or if the weight of your wheels actually matters over watts saved via deeper aero wheels, but they always seem to forget these aero gains are mostly tested in win tunnels and as 20+ MPH. Again this is why I would recommend your front wheel being 50mm or less unless you are putting out some serious watts
Jrasero is offline  
Old 07-27-23, 11:30 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,272
Liked 1,301 Times in 632 Posts
Originally Posted by Jrasero
People will debate all day about rotational weight or if the weight of your wheels actually matters over watts saved via deeper aero wheels, but they always seem to forget these aero gains are mostly tested in win tunnels and as 20+ MPH.
What makes you think that people forget that aero differences are often tested at 20+ mph?
HTupolev is online now  
Old 07-27-23, 11:34 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 595

Bikes: Scott Foil RC, Winspace T1550

Liked 212 Times in 137 Posts
Originally Posted by HTupolev
What makes you think that people forget that aero differences are often tested at 20+ mph?
What makes you think most people understand any aero gains really start at 20+mph?
Jrasero is offline  
Old 07-27-23, 11:37 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,272
Liked 1,301 Times in 632 Posts
Originally Posted by Jrasero
What makes you think most people understand any aero gains really start at 20+mph?
I'm not sure what you mean. Aero gains do not "really start at 20+mph."
HTupolev is online now  
Old 07-27-23, 08:09 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 10,053
Liked 5,950 Times in 3,665 Posts
Originally Posted by Jrasero
I should also note while deep wheels will be faster it also really depends on your power. I am smaller rider and average 140W-150W, so nothing amazing and for me to get a heavier 65mm spun up to speed especially in a lot of stop and go cycling was tiresome. People will debate all day about rotational weight or if the weight of your wheels actually matters over watts saved via deeper aero wheels, but they always seem to forget these aero gains are mostly tested in win tunnels and as 20+ MPH. Again this is why I would recommend your front wheel being 50mm or less unless you are putting out some serious watts
While people endlessly debate it, engineers calculate what power it actually takes to accelerate a set of wheels. The answer is actually very little when comparing a typical weight difference between aero and lightweight climbing wheels eg 3-400g. The accelerations involved are also relatively small, even on a full bore sprint.
PeteHski is offline  
Old 07-27-23, 11:00 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,843

Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem

Liked 1,058 Times in 743 Posts
Originally Posted by Jrasero
What makes you think most people understand any aero gains really start at 20+mph?
That 20+ mph for best gains is a combination of you and the wind, not just you. The wheels in the wind tunnel may be spinning but they're not moving forward so in the windtunnel all of that 20+mph is how fast the wind is moving not the rider. On the road its a combination. So even a slow rider can find some benefit, even if they only average 14mph, a breeze can provide the other 6+ for full benefit.
Russ Roth is offline  
Old 07-28-23, 05:27 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
msu2001la's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,902
Liked 1,500 Times in 879 Posts
Originally Posted by Jrasero
What makes you think most people understand any aero gains really start at 20+mph?
Any?
msu2001la is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.