Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Road Cycling (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/)
-   -   On Becoming A Real Man (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/490653-becoming-real-man.html)

Beaker 11-30-08 07:39 PM

Perhaps a better question is how many times the silent majority opt out of responding and contributing something noteworthy?

I for one don't have any issues with pcad in his posts - he normally offers either a) advice, b) pretty good balloon puncturing sarcasm or c) sleight of hand that avoids the wrath of others, while mentioning Cervelo and/or DA7900. There are many others who do not contribute any of these.

cuda2k 11-30-08 07:39 PM

They are not silent. They report threads and posts all day, every day. They ask us to clean up this forum of the trash that some of the loud thick headed "regulars" routinely spout on this forum. Us, as moderators, attempt to strike a balance. However, in my opinion, the "regulars" have started to take in the way of banter and "good humored ribbings" more than they give in terms of actual meaningful content on this board.

I stopped venturing into this subforum nearly completely for nearly 4-5 months over the last year. I'd had enough of it. For many of the very reasons BillyD pointed out in this thread. I commend him on standing up and saying it. Just because you don't like the fact he said it doesn't make it any less true.

You have a choice on how to act every moment of every day of your life. It's easier to act like a jerk on the internet, I know it, but I choose to act like I would act in person. Perhaps you are too. I don't know you in person so I don't know. But I do know that there are people on this forum that I'd have no interest in meeting in person, let alone riding with, had I the choice. Maybe they are different in person, but by the way they come across online, I don't care to find out.

umd 11-30-08 07:49 PM

I posit that interestly, the road racing forum is much more civil than the road cycling forum...

bdcheung 11-30-08 07:51 PM

Well I'm glad you're back cuda. As a mod, what are you going to do to change things around here?

Sammilove 11-30-08 07:57 PM


Originally Posted by bdcheung (Post 7941299)
Well I'm glad you're back cuda. As a mod, what are you going to do to change things around here?

I would tell you to STFU and learn to use your ignore button.

bdcheung 11-30-08 07:59 PM


Originally Posted by Sammilove (Post 7941341)
I would tell you to STFU and learn to use your ignore button.

I would tell you to read at least the first page of a thread before jumping in.

Sammilove 11-30-08 08:04 PM


Originally Posted by bdcheung (Post 7941353)
I would tell you to read at least the first page of a thread before jumping in.


And I would tell you that I have read the entire thread, and agree with BillyD.

I am one of those 'silent members' who is tired of seeing people getting blasted simply because they are new.

Have you asked yourself how you can make this a better community for everyone? Or do you simply not care about the eyes reading this, and nodding in agreement with BillyD?

What have YOU done to make this a better place for everyone, including me?

bdcheung 11-30-08 08:11 PM


Originally Posted by Sammilove (Post 7941380)
What have YOU done to make this a better place for everyone, including me?

I've not let inflammatory posts like this incite rash responses from me.

cuda2k 11-30-08 08:16 PM


Originally Posted by bdcheung (Post 7941299)
Well I'm glad you're back cuda. As a mod, what are you going to do to change things around here?

I'm discussing with the mods and admins about an addendum to Tom's intro to Road Cycling sticky. Basically stating that while there is a roadie culture that needs to be understood in here, it does not give members the right or privilege to violate the community guidelines of this forum. From there, try to get more coverage and more even moderation in this forum. We brought on a number of new mods in recent months to try to achieve this in here, and in some regards that helped.

However, what we really need is more self moderation. Members trying to realized that just because they can say something, doesn't mean they should say it. I occasionally delete the first sentence of a response by the time I get finished typing the full post. Why? Because I feel I don't need to state the obvious, ie "You're an idiot" or the like (yes, I do think it, and yes I do type it, but rarely does it get submitted). Instead, I leave what is meaningful, and hopefully beneficial.

Can Road Cycling be changed, yes. Should it be changed, probably. Can it be done with an Iron Fist from the mods, not without much more pain on both sides than is worth it. Can it be done with everyone doing a little bit and thus doing their part - absolutely. I came to this forum in 2005 looking for help on a way too big bike I'd bought on ebay for $10. It was 3 sizes too big, stem shifters, chicken wing brake levers, the works. Granted my photography might have been a little better than the new member in question today, but had I gotten the same responses he had, I'd probably responded in much the same way. Or not at all. It's the not at all that is the worst. You mentioned the silent majority, those are the members who are here and contribute now and then, ready plenty, but don't feel like opening themselves up to the "regulars" responses.

How many others, good riders, who you and I could both learn from, do you think may never post here because of how some people post? Or new riders who love the sport and just want to learn and get better? The newbie may not have as much to share with us who have been riding a while, but we all started somewhere. And on the next ride into a 20mph headwind, when you're wishing the pace line rotation was a little longer, consider you may have discouraged a rider from getting better who could be up there in front of you taking the wind for a turn instead of it being your turn.

cuda2k 11-30-08 08:19 PM

sammy, thanks for making your opinion heard. However I think the message of this thread was to try to say things in a more respectful way so that your message isn't lost in the harshness of it's delivery. I've said my peace above (at least for now). I've got a major software release on one of my websites to get ready to be pushed here in about 40mins. So, I bid you all a good night, and hope ya'll got more miles over the last 4 days than I did. :beer:

Sammilove 11-30-08 08:21 PM


Originally Posted by cuda2k (Post 7941470)
I'm discussing with the mods and admins about an addendum to Tom's intro to Road Cycling sticky. Basically stating that while there is a roadie culture that needs to be understood in here, it does not give members the right or privilege to violate the community guidelines of this forum. From there, try to get more coverage and more even moderation in this forum. We brought on a number of new mods in recent months to try to achieve this in here, and in some regards that helped.

However, what we really need is more self moderation. Members trying to realized that just because they can say something, doesn't mean they should say it. I occasionally delete the first sentence of a response by the time I get finished typing the full post. Why? Because I feel I don't need to state the obvious, ie "You're an idiot" or the like (yes, I do think it, and yes I do type it, but rarely does it get submitted). Instead, I leave what is meaningful, and hopefully beneficial.

Can Road Cycling be changed, yes. Should it be changed, probably. Can it be done with an Iron Fist from the mods, not without much more pain on both sides than is worth it. Can it be done with everyone doing a little bit and thus doing their part - absolutely. I came to this forum in 2005 looking for help on a way too big bike I'd bought on ebay for $10. It was 3 sizes too big, stem shifters, chicken wing brake levers, the works. Granted my photography might have been a little better than the new member in question today, but had I gotten the same responses he had, I'd probably responded in much the same way. Or not at all. It's the not at all that is the worst. You mentioned the silent majority, those are the members who are here and contribute now and then, ready plenty, but don't feel like opening themselves up to the "regulars" responses.

How many others, good riders, who you and I could both learn from, do you think may never post here because of how some people post? Or new riders who love the sport and just want to learn and get better? The newbie may not have as much to share with us who have been riding a while, but we all started somewhere. And on the next ride into a 20mph headwind, when you're wishing the pace line rotation was a little longer, consider you may have discouraged a rider from getting better who could be up there in front of you taking the wind for a turn instead of it being your turn.

Thanks!

This is exactly what BillyD was discussing, and what I was talking about.

Bdcheung, my post isn't inflammatory at all--but your response is telling.

I AM the silent majority. Your response shows that you are not ready to help me.

Sammilove 11-30-08 08:23 PM


Originally Posted by cuda2k (Post 7941487)
sammy, thanks for making your opinion heard. However I think the message of this thread was to try to say things in a more respectful way so that your message isn't lost in the harshness of it's delivery. I've said my peace above (at least for now). I've got a major software release on one of my websites to get ready to be pushed here in about 40mins. So, I bid you all a good night, and hope ya'll got more miles over the last 4 days than I did. :beer:

I know, and the point I was making is that my post is considered 'inflammatory', when it's the standard here in Road Cycling.

Ironic, eh?

Siu Blue Wind 11-30-08 08:35 PM


Originally Posted by Beaker (Post 7941179)
I'd argue that one only enters "into" a topic by clicking on "submit reply". Up until then we all have control over whether we can be bothered to enter the fray.

Indeed.

Again. I agree that one should lurk within a community to get the feel of it before posting so as to get an idea of what to expect. There is a disclosure, a warning of sorts but that still does not give permission to go at him.

But when a newbie posts for the first time and asks for his bike to be judged, I would think it's in terms of a constructive way, not one that belittles the way he has the bike set up. I think he was searching for help more than anything. And although there were some honest helpful opinions, he more or less tried to defend himself by posting what he did which translated to him not coming here again.

If some believe he was a troll, then why feed the troll?

Even if so, granted sometimes members rib each other here, a TRUE newbie who is TRULY lurking might see it and be scared off, too intimidated to seek help, thinking he is not part of the "crew". And at that point I saw that some tried to let him know it was joking, and some continued on.

Please don't be mean. It's just not fitting. :(

Just remember that behind the keyboard there is a real person out there. With real feelings.

j_amie_ 11-30-08 08:37 PM

Man you guys whine WAY to much.....

Grumpy McTrumpy 11-30-08 08:39 PM


Originally Posted by j_amie_ (Post 7941606)
Man you guys whine WAY to much.....

define whining.

Corsaire 11-30-08 08:40 PM


Originally Posted by BillyD (Post 7939089)
subtitled: How hard is it to be tolerant of someone not yet up to your standards?

There was a thread started here this morning by a new, young rider asking for comments on his bike. As usual several posters jumped at the apparently irresistible opportunity to blast the guy. Not surprising around here . . . inexcusable, yes, but sadly not surprising. Sure his bike had issues, but what do you expect from a new roadie?

What really appalled me was the excuses -- somehow some guys felt justified in their insensitivities. Somehow some guys feel being mean to other people makes them a man, in their own feeble miscalculations. This too is typical . . . among the weak. They feel that insulting and injuring others makes them feel better about themselves and enhances their masculinity.

You don't need to be a psychologist to decipher this . . . it's transparent, it's glaring, and it's pathetic.

I have a suggestion -- if you find yourself so lacking in self-esteem in your life, do what a real man would do and work on your insecurities. Do some research -- the internet is conveniently at your disposal -- and spend more time working on correcting your shortcomings instead of lurking around internet forums pouncing on the defenseless.

Internet muscles disappear when you're face-to-face.

Disclaimer:
I'm addressing just a handful of individuals, clearly not the majority. I'm adverse to internet conflict so I won't name names . . . they know who they are, they walk around with a perpetual chip on their shoulders.
My apologies to the rest of the forum that these unpleasantries had to be addressed . . . and the Mods mercifully closed the thread before I could get this in.


End of Rant.

AMEN brother

j_amie_ 11-30-08 08:44 PM


Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy (Post 7941616)
define whining.

whine |(h)wīn|
noun
a long, high-pitched complaining cry : the dog gave a small whine.
• a long, high-pitched unpleasant sound : the whine of the engine.
• a complaining tone of voice.
• a feeble or petulant complaint : a constant whine about the quality of public services

Grumpy McTrumpy 11-30-08 08:50 PM

I see little evidence of whining here. It is a typed forum and thus has no actual sound.

Your third definition might be applicable but I see no evidence of either feebleness or petulance.

bdcheung 11-30-08 08:52 PM

Everyone who has had issue with the content on the Road forum but never said anything is just as responsible as those who contributed the content.

merlinextraligh 11-30-08 08:53 PM


Originally Posted by umd (Post 7941289)
I posit that interestly, the road racing forum is much more civil than the road cycling forum...

Thats because we actually get out and race, and many know each other in real life. It creates a different dynamic.

As for the rest of this. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.

I think there are a fair number of people who post in the road forum that have something to add, that would not bother to answer questions for the 20th time if there wasn't some good natured banter included in the deal.

patentcad 11-30-08 08:54 PM


Originally Posted by cuda2k (Post 7941470)
I'm discussing with the mods and admins about an addendum to Tom's intro to Road Cycling sticky. Basically stating that while there is a roadie culture that needs to be understood in here, it does not give members the right or privilege to violate the community guidelines of this forum. From there, try to get more coverage and more even moderation in this forum. We brought on a number of new mods in recent months to try to achieve this in here, and in some regards that helped.

However, what we really need is more self moderation. Members trying to realized that just because they can say something, doesn't mean they should say it. I occasionally delete the first sentence of a response by the time I get finished typing the full post. Why? Because I feel I don't need to state the obvious, ie "You're an idiot" or the like (yes, I do think it, and yes I do type it, but rarely does it get submitted). Instead, I leave what is meaningful, and hopefully beneficial.

Can Road Cycling be changed, yes. Should it be changed, probably. Can it be done with an Iron Fist from the mods, not without much more pain on both sides than is worth it. Can it be done with everyone doing a little bit and thus doing their part - absolutely. I came to this forum in 2005 looking for help on a way too big bike I'd bought on ebay for $10. It was 3 sizes too big, stem shifters, chicken wing brake levers, the works. Granted my photography might have been a little better than the new member in question today, but had I gotten the same responses he had, I'd probably responded in much the same way. Or not at all. It's the not at all that is the worst. You mentioned the silent majority, those are the members who are here and contribute now and then, ready plenty, but don't feel like opening themselves up to the "regulars" responses.

How many others, good riders, who you and I could both learn from, do you think may never post here because of how some people post? Or new riders who love the sport and just want to learn and get better? The newbie may not have as much to share with us who have been riding a while, but we all started somewhere. And on the next ride into a 20mph headwind, when you're wishing the pace line rotation was a little longer, consider you may have discouraged a rider from getting better who could be up there in front of you taking the wind for a turn instead of it being your turn.

This board is no different than the road cycling scene (racing and non-racing) I've been immersed in for over 20 years. Much like a group ride, newbies who choose to partake will occasionally get yelled at. That's no different than the sport. If the ribbing they take here scares them off, I can't imagine what they'll do the first time they encounter a typical group ride. In other words I seriously doubt anything you do here will make any difference in the Big Picture, and you'll really only be trying to homogenize road cycling culture.

That's like Missionaries in the rainforest. And you know what happens to them.

http://www.reachout.org/eots/eots%20221.jpg

umd 11-30-08 08:55 PM


Originally Posted by merlinextraligh (Post 7941694)
Thats because we actually get out and race, and many know each other in real life. It creates a different dynamic.

As for the rest of this. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.

I think there are a fair number of people who post in the road forum that have something to add, that would not bother to answer questions for the 20th time if there wasn't some good natured banter included in the deal.

I think that just about sums it up on both counts.

patentcad 11-30-08 08:57 PM


Originally Posted by umd (Post 7941709)
I think that just about sums it up on both counts.

Correct.

BillyD 11-30-08 09:02 PM


Originally Posted by j_amie_ (Post 7941649)
whine |(h)wīn|
noun
a long, high-pitched complaining cry : the dog gave a small whine.
• a long, high-pitched unpleasant sound : the whine of the engine.
• a complaining tone of voice.
• a feeble or petulant complaint : a constant whine about the quality of public services

Oh, if you only knew what an absolute jerk you're sounding like. :lol:

One day when you finally grow up, if ever, you'll look back and learn something from today and the many other days like this you'll be experiencing. You don't even realize how much you're embarassing yourself.

Anyway, shouldn't you be getting to bed? Are you all ready for school tomorrow?

Sammilove 11-30-08 09:02 PM


Originally Posted by bdcheung (Post 7941693)
Everyone who has had issue with the content on the Road forum but never said anything is just as responsible as those who contributed the content.

You are granted absolution, then.

I am happy to know that if I make a naive comment in the future, that I will not be treated with disrespect.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:57 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.