Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Hostile Post Environment?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Hostile Post Environment?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-09 | 01:22 PM
  #326  
NomadVW's Avatar
部門ニ/自転車オタク
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,173
Likes: 0
From: Sterling, VA

Bikes: 2008 Blue T16, 2009 Blue RC8, 2012 Blue Norcross CX, 2016 Blue Axino SL, 2016 Scott Scale, Fixie, Fetish Cycles Road Bike (on the trainer)

Originally Posted by BarracksSi
If they did that with every thread and post, we'd only have about ten percent left.
And the collective IQ of the Road Cycling forum posts would increase by the 90%
__________________
Envision, Energize, Enable
NomadVW is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 01:24 PM
  #327  
BarracksSi's Avatar
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,863
Likes: 6
From: Washington, DC

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Originally Posted by NomadVW
And the collective IQ of the Road Cycling forum posts would increase by the 90%
Oh, noooo, that's not how these things work; the smart ones would simply leave, knowing they can get their info elsewhere without all the worthless banter.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 04:14 PM
  #328  
FLvector's Avatar
Stand and Deliver
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,340
Likes: 1
From: Tampa Bay

Bikes: Cannondale R1000, Giant TCR Advanced, Giant TCR Advanced SL

This thread was originally about why females might not feel comfortable participating in this forum due to the vulgar and sexist comments. It stayed on track longer than I thought it would, but the petty comments about winning arguments and other crap that has little or nothing to do with the subject, have pulled it way off topic.

Some of the comments by the females in this thread were spot on, particularly by trigger. I do hope that more females post in the future and can look beyond the juvenile attitudes and offensive comments to ask questions and share their knowledge.

I agree with the mods in letting this thread play itself out. No harm done and maybe a few will think before they type. Then again, this is BF, not too likely.

Last edited by FLvector; 09-20-09 at 04:35 PM.
FLvector is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 04:43 PM
  #329  
DrPete's Avatar
Dirt-riding heretic
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 8
From: Gig Harbor, WA

Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9

Originally Posted by trigger
Not that long ago, being black and engaging in certain activities or yes, even dressing certain ways in certain places was considered "high risk". We got over that.

Not that long ago, being *****exual and engaging in certain activities or yes, dressing certain ways was considered "high risk". We got over that.

Being a woman and dressing a certain way is only going to be considered "high risk" as long as we (as a society) decide that violent sexual behaviour toward women is OK under certain circumstances. Why can't we just, as with the examples above, decide that it's wrong. Because, you know, it is.

Ask your wives, girlfriends, sisters and female friends ... women that you can all pretty much know not be "those sorts of women", you know, the kind that "ask for it". You will likely be shocked at the number of them that have endured inappropriate sexual advances from men. And when I say that, I don't mean some guy coming on too strong at a bar or the local construction yahoos shouting out some choice comments. I mean scary encounters. It should give you pause.
Thank you for helping make my point.
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
DrPete is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 04:45 PM
  #330  
DrPete's Avatar
Dirt-riding heretic
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 8
From: Gig Harbor, WA

Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9

Originally Posted by BarracksSi
So, as a single guy, I'm guilty—by association—of drugging and raping women.

Yeah, thanks. Thanks a lot.
No offense, but how did you make that leap?
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
DrPete is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 05:23 PM
  #331  
coffeecake's Avatar
Blocking your fire exits
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
So much for respect and all that. Last two pages sum up exactly why women avoid this forum. Who wants to stand up to guys who believe that women should be blamed if they're ***** while dressed "provocatively"?

Also, guys, if you think the only way that women can attract a guy's attention is through showing cleavage, you're doing it wrong.
coffeecake is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 05:50 PM
  #332  
BarracksSi's Avatar
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,863
Likes: 6
From: Washington, DC

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Originally Posted by DrPete
No offense, but how did you make that leap?
All I hear in this thread is, "Men do this, men do that, blah blah blah..." Anything worse and we're eating babies and clubbing panda bears.

This is why I never strike up conversations with women -- I have to be defensive from the start. Just because I'm a guy doesn't mean that I want to sleep with every girl I see.

Maybe I should stop carrying a harness and cat o' nine tails...
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 06:11 PM
  #333  
Tulex's Avatar
Junk Mile Junkie
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,465
Likes: 2
From: Webster, NY
Originally Posted by coffeecake
So much for respect and all that. Last two pages sum up exactly why women avoid this forum. Who wants to stand up to guys who believe that women should be blamed if they're ***** while dressed "provocatively"?

Also, guys, if you think the only way that women can attract a guy's attention is through showing cleavage, you're doing it wrong.
I don't see that anyone has said that. If that's what you want to read into it, that's your choice.
Tulex is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 06:12 PM
  #334  
DrPete's Avatar
Dirt-riding heretic
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 8
From: Gig Harbor, WA

Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9

Originally Posted by BarracksSi
All I hear in this thread is, "Men do this, men do that, blah blah blah..." Anything worse and we're eating babies and clubbing panda bears.

This is why I never strike up conversations with women -- I have to be defensive from the start. Just because I'm a guy doesn't mean that I want to sleep with every girl I see.

Maybe I should stop carrying a harness and cat o' nine tails...
No need to be defensive. Simple courtesy works just fine. Nobody's saying that you want to sleep with every girl you see.
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
DrPete is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 06:29 PM
  #335  
coffeecake's Avatar
Blocking your fire exits
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Blaming women for being ***** - calling them "stupid", "dick teases" and "hookers" who dress "provocatively":

Originally Posted by The Weak Link
People who dress like a hooker should not be shocked if they are treated like one.
Originally Posted by Tulex
I'm saying people have to own what they do. A woman has the right to walk through Central Park at 2AM. Doing so would be stupid. So when she gets *****, sure the guy is wrong. Does it make her right?
My point is, having a right doesn't make it right. And quite frankly, I have no desire to be PC. I'm extremely tired of watching movements go from people not having rights to those same people abusing rights. And when it comes to women being provocative, it's not anyones personal view of whether or not she is, but the general opinion that will matter. And if a woman is seen as a dick tease, there won't be much sympathy for her when she gets called on it.


DrPete has articulated it much better than I could.

Originally Posted by DrPete
Wow. Again, 100% based on the idea than 1. men can't control themselves and 2. it's totally OK if they can't. 1952 called and they'd like their attitudes on women back.

The ideas you're expressing fall on the benign end of a continuum of a lot of things done to women, and the "she was asking for it" defense still holds up in a lot of places.
coffeecake is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 07:05 PM
  #336  
Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 16,049
Likes: 29
From: South Florida

Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike

Originally Posted by BarracksSi
Oh yeah, the one that asked one of the most ridiculously stupid and idiotic questions I've ever seen on BF: "How do I start a Critical Mass?"

You were a moron there, too. No wonder you haven't learned your lesson -- you don't know when you've lost.
Alright, time to chill back the personal attacks a bit, folks, or the thread will wind up closed for a cooling off period.
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
Tom Stormcrowe is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 07:06 PM
  #337  
Machka's Avatar
In Real Life
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 52,159
Likes: 773
From: Down under down under

Bikes: Lots

I'm not sure how we got from women feeling a bit uncomfortable when they come into the Road forum ...... to ****. Can we take several large steps back please?

Let's go back to a comment I thought I read here ... there's too many pages to go through to find it now ... something about society, women, and exercise.


I suspect part of the reason women feel uncomfortable coming into the Road forum has nothing at all to do with the possibility of encountering crude comments, but rather that for some reason society in general still does not encourage women to be active.

When the Paris-Brest-Paris first started, there were women who wanted to participate in it, but they were turned down because it was thought that a ride of that magnitude might kill them ... and also probably because doing things like that wasn't considered lady-like. But that was the attitude of the turn of the century ... women were considered fragile, and participating in sports was considered un-lady-like.

Unfortunately that attitude has continued through the years, although the current curriculums (in Canada and Australia, at least) are trying to encourage girls to participate in sports and to make sports and activity a life-long thing.

In addition to that is the attitude that women are naturally not mechanically inclined. I don't think that's true ... they just haven't been given a chance to become mechanically inclined. Throughout history women have been taught to sew and cook and do that sort of thing, while the men were out working with the horses and plow, or working on the tractor, or whatever. Again, it wasn't considered lady-like to fix a tractor.

And schools promoted this by putting the guys into shop and putting the girls into the cooking classes. Even when I went to school, I was put in one shop class (because they were making a very small effort to make all the classes gender neutral) where I was allowed to bend metal, but that was it ... I was not allowed to actually work on the car or anything, and I was put in several sewing and cooking classes ... which I hated and never did very well in.

So many of the guys here may have gotten their first bicycles when they were 5 or 6 and have been tearing around on bicycles since then, and have been involved in other sports. They may also have been involved in mechanical activities like the shop classes where they rebuild engines etc., so they have developed a mechanical ability. They have also developed the vocabulary that goes along with being involved in sports and mechanical things.

Women may have gotten a bicycle when they were young too, but by the time they hit their teen years most women I know put the bicycle away and if they were involved in any sort of sport, they gradually stopped doing that too. Most women I know have never rebuilt a car or done anything mechanical. They don't know an allen key from a crescent wrench. Most women I know got married and had kids and became working or stay-at-home moms and never gave their bicycles or sports a second thought.

And many women, even here on BF, are still in that sort of mindset. IF they happen to get a bicycle it's because of pressure from a husband or boyfriend, or maybe a vague desire to get into shape. But they feel like they know so little about bicycles that they are not even sure what questions to ask. They might not even have the vocabulary to use. Maybe they venture in here, but they see everyone talking away using words they don't understand or in ways they don't understand. And they see all the teasing that goes on. And so ... they don't come back here to ask questions.


I have had no problem coming here to the Road forum. I've been cycling since I was 6 years old. I grew up in a family where both my parents cycled. I grew up reading Bicycling Magazine. This is all familiar territory to me.

But I'm venturing into the world of mtn biking with the paths and trails around here so I thought I'd go into the Mountain Bike Forum for the first time ever last week and see if I could find any advice on descending. I thought I'd start by reading their Newbie sticky ... because that's what we encourage newbies to do here. I made it about halfway through the first post in the Newbie sticky and was lost. The Newbie thread was too advanced for me. I don't know their vocabulary! I glanced over some of the other posts and felt even more intimidated and lost. I left without asking my question and haven't been back because I was afraid my question would sound really stupid and that I wouldn't understand the answers they gave me anyway.

I suspect that's how a lot of women (and perhaps male newbies as well) feel when they come here too.


What can we do about it? I'm not sure ... but in the Mountain Bike forum I would have appreciated a dictionary of terms as a sticky ... maybe we need something like that here too. Maybe we need to take another look at the Newbie sticky to make sure it is welcoming ... and basic.

Last edited by Machka; 09-20-09 at 07:10 PM.
Machka is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 07:09 PM
  #338  
DrPete's Avatar
Dirt-riding heretic
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 8
From: Gig Harbor, WA

Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9

Originally Posted by Machka
I'm not sure how we got from women feeling a bit uncomfortable when they come into the Road forum ...... to ****. Can we take several large steps back please?
All the attitudes exist on a continuum, and honestly I think the conversation has brought out some fairly disturbing attitudes. There's definitely a common thread of "men can't help it, so women have to deal" that seems incredibly benign when talking about conversations/forum discussions but seems quite horrific when taken to its not-so-far-fetched logical conclusion.
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
DrPete is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 07:12 PM
  #339  
DrPete's Avatar
Dirt-riding heretic
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 8
From: Gig Harbor, WA

Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9

Originally Posted by NomadVW
Just thought I'd point out you're on page 11 and neither of the previous two pages had anything to do with road biking or the road bike forum. Can someone take out the garbage?
Just thought I'd point out that there are mods and admins keeping an eye on this thread, and that not clicking on a thread really doesn't require all that much effort.
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."
DrPete is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 07:19 PM
  #340  
DrPete's Avatar
Dirt-riding heretic
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 8
From: Gig Harbor, WA

Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9

Originally Posted by Bearonabike
Dr. Pete, how did you educate your daughter? Likely the same way I educated my 17 year old and will educate my 7 month old. You can't be UN-*****, you can't be UN-murdered. There is a Bill of Rights, but there also needs to be a "Bill of Responsibilities." We are devolving into a society (and maybe even a forum) where there are only rights, not responsibilities. The ultimate result is still undesirable.
Of course I'll teach her to be smart/safe, but ultimately smart and safe don't matter. Meanwhile, my wife is working with the frat boys to teach them that no, it's not OK to get a girl hammered and have your way with her without her consent, to abuse them verbally, emotionally, or physically, etc. etc. Changing men's attitudes toward women is a much more effective way of changing things than just telling women to stay inside, never drink, and not interact with the opposite sex ever.
__________________
"Unless he was racing there was no way he could match my speed."

Last edited by DrPete; 09-20-09 at 07:25 PM.
DrPete is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 07:19 PM
  #341  
Flatballer's Avatar
No matches
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 11,647
Likes: 444
From: Eastern PA

Bikes: two wheeled ones

Originally Posted by Machka
Comments like this are not at all helpful to the discussion here except by giving us an example of the sort of hostile environment women and others may object to.

Mods, please delete v70cat.
fixed.
Flatballer is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 07:26 PM
  #342  
location:northern Ohio
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Machka
It may come as a surprise to some ... but .... yep, I sure am!!



I'm a female whose occupations of choice were Engineering Technology and Software Development, fields field with few females in them (at least at the time I was in them); who has worked in an Engineering office where I was the sole female among about 30+ males; who made a re-entry into cycling via bodybuilding for a couple years in a gym that was predominantly male; and who was often the only female out there when I raced bicycles and while I've been involved in Randonneuring.

In general, I probably relate better to males than I do to females.
In the words of Crocodile Dundee,
"just checking"
spry is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 07:35 PM
  #343  
danarnold's Avatar
Kaffee Nazi
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
From: Richland, WA

Bikes: 2009 Kestrel RT800, 2007 Roubaix, 1976 Lambert-Viscount

Originally Posted by trigger
....
...And, its kinda interesting that most of the female voices that contributed to the start of this thread are now very, very quiet. It's hard to want to keep participating when you have a bunch of men (even if they mean well) expressing such latent hostility toward women and engaging in paternalistic discussion of what behaviour we should / should not engage in.

As I've said before, reframe much of the discussion over the last couple of pages in a racial context and I suspect everyone would be able to see it's inappropriateness....
Well said. I think that if men would try to see things from the points of view of their wives and daughters, we wouldn't be afflicted with as much of this BS as we are.

I use any opportunity to brag about my own daughters, one a financial analyst, the other a Harvard educated lawyer. They continue to teach me much and always with humor. Somehow they have survived the failings of their parents and a sexist society.
danarnold is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 07:40 PM
  #344  
Boudicca's Avatar
Conquer Cancer rider
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,040
Likes: 1
From: Toronto

Bikes: Fun bike, city bike, touring bike, swish new ebike, Bike Friday

You should be proud of 'em danarnold!

(And reading your post, you definitely are)
__________________
Zero gallons to the mile
Boudicca is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 07:40 PM
  #345  
logdrum's Avatar
Headset-press carrier
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
From: Corrales New Mexico

Bikes: Kona with Campy 8, Lynskey Ti with Rival, Bianchi pista, Raleigh Team Frame with SRAM Red, Specialized Stump Jumper, Surley Big Dummy

Originally Posted by Tulex
Again, I'm not talking about how wrong a perp is or isn't. I'm talking about owning what we do. If a woman wants to be provocative, she is doing so at her own risk. Right or wrong, it is a fact. We all make choices in the same way, so to single out women is to ignore the fact that we all have to look out for ourselves. And we all do to some level. Just as I don't ride through the inner city, some women don't dress provocatively to help prevent negative results.

How is dressing provocatively not high risk if there is a known likelihood of negative results from doing so? Quite frankly, I find your argument that there is right and wrong to ignore reality. We would have to not have free will for it to work, a place I don't care to go. Think about it DrPete, if man isn't supposed to react to a woman being provocative, what would she do to get a man to make an advance? Would we make a law that if a woman wears green, it's a go? Believe it or not, many women that do dress provocatively do want an advance made on them. That is why the do it.

This is completely inane thinking. Women get *****, rofeed even if they are wearing Amish dresses. If you know anything about women at all, they go pretty and sexy for themselves, other women and then men, in that order. No one goes **** frenzy in Scandinavia in the summer in a sea of beautiful naked women sunbathing.
logdrum is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 07:46 PM
  #346  
grolby's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,872
Likes: 152
From: BOSTON BABY
Originally Posted by DrPete
All the attitudes exist on a continuum, and honestly I think the conversation has brought out some fairly disturbing attitudes. There's definitely a common thread of "men can't help it, so women have to deal" that seems incredibly benign when talking about conversations/forum discussions but seems quite horrific when taken to its not-so-far-fetched logical conclusion.
Thanks DrPete, you are absolutely spot-on. I've been staying out of this because I'm just too run-down on the subject to get involved, I'm glad to see that there's some thoughtfulness and compassion here.

And BarracksSi and others who are feeling defensive about "men do this, men do that..." etc: if it's not about you, then it's not about you.

But of course, it IS about us. You hear about this because **** and sexual assault are things that men do to women. Period. Yes, there are cases where women abuse men, and these men need resources, but it is simply a drop in the bucket compared to the harassment, abuse and **** committed against women by men. When as many as 1 in 4 college-aged women have reported having had sexual contact to which they did not consent, you have a massive society-wide problem. This is why the most effective education is focused on men. Men are the perpetrators. And DrPete is very right to point out that the kind of attitudes commonly expressed on this board and in this thread are the kind of attitudes that enable this behavior, which is, not altogether inappropriately, described by some as a war against women.

So if you actively speak out against the attitude that women, no matter what it is they're doing, should be trying to please you, or the idea that men both lack self-control and that this is okay, or against the idea that women who get ***** or harassed are, somehow, more responsible for being ***** or harassed than the man who actually did it, then it doesn't apply to you.

But if not, you have something to think about. Don't get defensive. Do something about it. There's no doubt that awareness can lead to some painful introspection and even shame, but making the world safer and more fun for everyone is worth an occasional personal challenge. There's no need to wear a hairshirt about it, or anything.

Oh, right, what does this have to do with the board? As DrPete said, plenty. And if nothing else, it makes this one more place that isn't comfortable or safe to just exist and engage in a hobby for your own personal enjoyment and actualization. Lots of us cycle to get away from the worries of everyday life. What many women are hearing when they log onto this board is that, even when they're on a bike, the real reason that they're out there is to provide eye candy for male cyclists. In fact, lots of you won't let them ever forget it. And if that's the case, well damn - why ride? Why post here? Where's the fun when you're not taken seriously except as part of the scenery? What a crappy situation.
grolby is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 07:53 PM
  #347  
coffeecake's Avatar
Blocking your fire exits
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
^^Yes. This.
coffeecake is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 07:54 PM
  #348  
The Weak Link's Avatar
Banned.
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 9
From: Post-partisan Paradise

Bikes: GF Wahoo '05, Trek T1000 '04, Lemond Buenos Aires '07

I think we should give ourselves one big group Internets hug and all agree to kiss and make up.

Is...that...OK?

Those of us who have been insensitive, whoever we may be and however blind to our shortcomings we are, need to promise to do better.

I for one have really really learned a lot from Dr Pete and the rest of you who labor to educate the Philistines.

After all, my wife, mother, three daughters and two granddaughters are all female and I would that everyone show them respect and deference, as I would to any mother, wife, daughter, or granddaughter out there.

Good grief and good night.
The Weak Link is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 07:56 PM
  #349  
Machka's Avatar
In Real Life
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 52,159
Likes: 773
From: Down under down under

Bikes: Lots

Originally Posted by grolby
oh, right, what does this have to do with the board? As drpete said, plenty. And if nothing else, it makes this one more place that isn't comfortable or safe to just exist and engage in a hobby for your own personal enjoyment and actualization. Lots of us cycle to get away from the worries of everyday life. what many women are hearing when they log onto this board is that, even when they're on a bike, the real reason that they're out there is to provide eye candy for male cyclists. In fact, lots of you won't let them ever forget it. And if that's the case, well damn - why ride? Why post here? Where's the fun when you're not taken seriously except as part of the scenery? What a crappy situation.
+1000
Machka is offline  
Old 09-20-09 | 08:11 PM
  #350  
BarracksSi's Avatar
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,863
Likes: 6
From: Washington, DC

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Originally Posted by grolby
What many women are hearing when they log onto this board is that, even when they're on a bike, the real reason that they're out there is to provide eye candy for male cyclists. In fact, lots of you won't let them ever forget it. And if that's the case, well damn - why ride? Why post here? Where's the fun when you're not taken seriously except as part of the scenery? What a crappy situation.
Which brings up another question --

Is is helpful at all when female racers -- legitimate cyclists by any definition, and can kick most of our asses any day of the week -- do sexy photoshoots for their sponsors, teams, portfolios, etc?

Granted, most of those pics don't show up unless someone starts a Hot Bike Chicks thread, but then again, there'd be a lot fewer pictures being posted if they weren't shot in the first place.

Not that the infamous Polish team pic helps anyone take men's cycling seriously...
BarracksSi is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.