Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Road Cycling (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/)
-   -   Addiction XVIII (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/860353-addiction-xviii.html)

LesterOfPuppets 12-17-12 05:45 PM

Awww, a mod just deleted a thread entitled Who is this botto goon?.

I'm so sad I missed that one.

Velo Vol 12-17-12 05:51 PM


Originally Posted by LesterOfPuppets (Post 15060737)
Awww, a mod

Withholding comment.

Has anyone else ever gotten into a discussion with a non-cyclist where you asserted that cycling is dumb and they disagreed? How do you respond?

runwiththewind 12-17-12 05:52 PM


Originally Posted by RollCNY (Post 15060044)
RwwW, statistically (if not legally) it is unwise to ever ride on the sidewalk. A disproportionate amount of cyclist fatalities come from side walk riders not being seen by cars entering or leaving driveways. It is something like 3:1 sidewalks vs road, if I recall correctly.

Thanks. Our sidewalks were originally bike paths around our community. There are no homes/driveways - great walking/biking paths. There are two routes I take that is around the outside of a golf course. No cars/driveways, just hard of hearing folks at times. Another route is down a major street - which the sidewalk runs parallel to. There's a pretty good stretch before I get to the next traffic light to cross over.

LowCel 12-17-12 05:53 PM


Originally Posted by surgeonstone (Post 15060603)
Did you laugh or did you think what an ass wipe.

I was still in a good mood at the time. :D

patentcad 12-17-12 05:56 PM

Who IS that botto goon?

runwiththewind 12-17-12 05:56 PM


Originally Posted by Velo Vol (Post 15060482)
I don't see a sidewalk breakdown on this NHTSA fact sheet, and I don't think anyone else would compile such a statistic.

http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811624.pdf

Not buying the 3:1 claim.

Picky, picky, I appreciate RollCNY's concern even if it's not statistically correct - I got his point!!!!

BillyD 12-17-12 06:01 PM


Originally Posted by Velo Vol (Post 15060750)
Withholding comment.

Spit it out!

Velo Vol 12-17-12 06:05 PM


Originally Posted by runwiththewind (Post 15060770)
Picky, picky, I appreciate RollCNY's concern even if it's not statistically correct - I got his point!!!!

I appreciate him providing something to argue about.

By the way, where do you ride in South Florida? My grandmother lives there and she's hard of hearing. I apologize in advance if she runs you over.

Velo Vol 12-17-12 06:06 PM


Originally Posted by BillyD (Post 15060793)
Spit it out!

I've gotten enough infractions for the week.

RollCNY 12-17-12 06:08 PM

The Insurance Institute matches the fatality info you provided from Transportation Department. Nothing really identifies where the person was located, and the only "where" data concentrates o Urban vs Rural.

The first two links are different surveys from self-reported injury rates of bicyclists, one in Washington State and the other in Toronto & Ottawa. Both show the incident rate and hazard rate of sidewalk injury as significantly higher than road rates. They do not include fatalities as they are hard to self-report.

http://www.enhancements.org/download/trb/1636-011.PDF

http://www.bicyclinglife.com/Library/Moritz2.htm

This one analyzes data including direction of travel, and discusses the issue of sidewalk travel as including both with and against traffic patterns. It finds sidewalk travel 2 times more likely to cause injury.

http://www.bicyclinglife.com/Library/riskfactors.htm

The last is NYC analysis, and it does not mention sidewalks in the least, but does show that travelling in a bike lane on a roadway is overwhelmingly the safest statistical spot for lowest fatality rate.

http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/download...fatalities.pdf

I found other spots where people comment on the higher risks of sidewalk, but they are bicycle safety sites that do not give provenance to their data.

I do find it interesting that many sources say 24-30% (depending on source and years reviewed) of bicycle fatalities involve intoxication of the cyclist.

surgeonstone 12-17-12 06:09 PM


Originally Posted by gsteinb (Post 15059242)
oy

People aren't bashing ownership. They're bashing ownership of weapons intended to level armies.

And this is a very good point. Arms and the right to bear them is a much different creature than the Revolutionary war soldier. A modern rifleman carrying a .223 assault rifle is now the equivalent, in fire power, of an entire WW2 platoon and a full company of Revolutionary war soldiers. I do not think the framers of the second amendment wanted each individual to have their own company of soldiers.

RollCNY 12-17-12 06:19 PM

So ultimately, my saying 3:1 is not supported by the data, and I gave it the "if I recall correctly" caveat. I obviously didn't. I think the raw numbers get blended with bicycle safety commentary like this subject piece:

http://www.coolbiking.com/blog/cycli...ow-of-traffic/

WhyFi 12-17-12 06:19 PM


Originally Posted by Velo Vol (Post 15060482)
I don't see a sidewalk breakdown on this NHTSA fact sheet, and I don't think anyone else would compile such a statistic.

http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811624.pdf

Not buying the 3:1 claim.

http://www.bikexprt.com/bikepol/faci.../sidecrash.htm

Velo Vol 12-17-12 06:30 PM


Originally Posted by WhyFi (Post 15060838)

That's considering all bike collisions (as opposed to cycling fatalities). I doubt many sidewalk cyclist/pedestrian accidents resulted in the cyclist being killed.

runwiththewind 12-17-12 06:31 PM


Originally Posted by surgeonstone (Post 15060795)
I read it and really did not care for the article. It seemed the author was too interested in drawing attention to herself and really was not accurately identifying the problem. The mental illness problem is not in violent Ausperger individuals at all. The problem is with severe depression. The perpetrators of these mass killings almost all come under the severe depressive with suicidal ideation. What makes them different than the typical suicide that is carried out alone, is the need for, and this seems very odd, company in death. These are not psychotic individuals and identifying them in order to prevent this kind of event from happening is simply impossible, there are too many of them and to distinguish the characteristics of the solitary suicide from the suicide with company can't be done.
There are other types as we all know, the true violent psychotics ( Charles Manson), medical problem ( Charles Whitman), and others. However the majority are severe depressives with suicidal ideation and we have an awful lot of them running around this country.

I read the article and got her point. I didn't feel she was too interested in drawing attention to herself. I know from what my neighbor went through with her son what a nightmare the system is. She had to Baker Act her kid before any one would help. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_Mental_Health_Act

Then they can check themselves out and back on the street. Sometimes the kid was picked up by the police because of his erratic behavior. I don't remember which show, maybe 60 minutes, where the parents live in fear of their kids - which this woman does. Adams problem doesn't fall into her situation. Overall, there needs to be a better care system for mental health in addition to gun control to protect innocent folks from getting shot.

RollCNY 12-17-12 06:37 PM


Originally Posted by Velo Vol (Post 15060884)
That's considering all bike collisions (as opposed to cycling fatalities). I doubt many sidewalk cyclist/pedestrian accidents resulted in the cyclist being killed.

It's all anecdotal, but several of research pieces I saw commented on a sidewalk accident of a bicyclist being hit by someone pulling into or out of a driveway may end up being classified as a pedestrian fatality. It is all how the police report it and the different statistics sites catalog it. All of the reports that have been linked discuss cyclists in the roadway.

rjones28 12-17-12 06:38 PM


Originally Posted by Velo Vol (Post 15060750)
Withholding comment.

Has anyone else ever gotten into a discussion with a non-cyclist where you asserted that cycling is dumb and they disagreed? How do you respond?

no

runwiththewind 12-17-12 06:41 PM


Originally Posted by Velo Vol (Post 15060801)
I appreciate him providing something to argue about. By the way, where do you ride in South Florida? My grandmother lives there and she's hard of hearing. I apologize in advance if she runs you over.


I don't think RollCNY was looking for an argument. I certainly didn't take it that way. Some older folks shouldn't be driving. I was coming out of Target and just stepped off the sidewalk into the street when a car comes around the corner and 1/2 the car is on the sidewalk, the other 1/2 is in the street. The old man kept driving not realizing he's on the sidewalk. Luckily my timing was good and I wasn't within reach otherwise I could have been run over.

Velo Vol 12-17-12 06:44 PM


Originally Posted by rjones28 (Post 15060915)
no

Why not?

WhyFi 12-17-12 06:46 PM


Originally Posted by LowCel (Post 15060911)
Are there people out there that actually follow Michael Moore? If so I have even less faith in this country than ever.

Could be worse - they could follow the tweets of those delusional NRA folks. The NRA has remained conspicuously silent, cancelling their "10 days..." giveaway and even got rid of their facebook page. Strange, almost like they're hiding.

Velo Vol 12-17-12 06:46 PM

I win. Volleyball time.

RollCNY 12-17-12 06:48 PM


Originally Posted by Velo Vol (Post 15060944)
Well I was.

You wanna dance, Tubby?

rjones28 12-17-12 06:49 PM


Originally Posted by LowCel (Post 15060900)
Why is that? I really do hate drugs and I think they should be illegal. What is wrong with that?

Put down the percoset. Druggie

rjones28 12-17-12 06:51 PM


Originally Posted by Velo Vol (Post 15060938)
Why not?

What was the question?

rjones28 12-17-12 06:51 PM

I'm going to see The Hobbit.

brb


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:30 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.