The imaginary benefits of modern race equipment
03-08-13, 08:25 AM
#52
2 Fat 2 Furious
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: England
Posts: 3,996
Bikes: 2009 Specialized Rockhopper Comp Disc, 2009 Specialized Tricross Sport RIP
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If a product is something I don't own then it's a pointless gimmick and the only people who would buy it are only out to show off how wealthy they are and what posers they are.
If it's something I do own then it's essential to the sport and the only reason anyone could possibly justify not having one is if they can't afford it, in which case they're wasting their time taking part at all.
__________________
"For a list of ways technology has failed to improve quality of life, press three"
"For a list of ways technology has failed to improve quality of life, press three"
03-08-13, 08:59 AM
#53
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,206
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
40 Posts
Oops, I meant to say while climbing. Sprinting is another example of when STI is far, far superior to DT shifters.
03-08-13, 09:02 AM
#54
well hello there
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Posts: 15,394
Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 494 Post(s)
Liked 300 Times
in
186 Posts
Nice job on the rant SJ. Nachoman approves.
__________________
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
03-08-13, 09:05 AM
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 22,498
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6508 Post(s)
Liked 6,594 Times
in
3,322 Posts
I think you missed the OP point about cages and straps. When cages are properly used they are just a secure (if not more secure) than clipless. The problem is that most people do not use cycling shoes with the cages nor do they tighten them down enough. People use regular tennis shoes rather than stiff cycling shoes that are made for toe straps. I believe that toe straps are still used in some velodrome races because they are more secure and those guys can rip the feet out of clipless.
The problem with properly set up toes straps is that you have to reach down an loosen the strap prior to pulling you foot out not really safe in traffic for you average rider. Clipless are better imo because the are easier to use and safer.
The problem with properly set up toes straps is that you have to reach down an loosen the strap prior to pulling you foot out not really safe in traffic for you average rider. Clipless are better imo because the are easier to use and safer.
If there is anything more modern I have to have, it's clipless pedals.
03-08-13, 09:26 AM
#57
South Carolina Ed
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 3,810
Bikes: Holdsworth custom, Macario Pro, Ciocc San Cristobal, Viner Nemo, Cyfac Le Mythique, Giant TCR, Tommasso Mondial, Cyfac Etoile
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 314 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times
in
109 Posts
03-08-13, 09:28 AM
#58
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,206
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
40 Posts
A step in the right direction but still not as easy to shift and certainly not while climbing hard or sprinting.
03-08-13, 09:28 AM
#59
Senior Member
I just switched to clips and straps on my track sprint bike. Big, burly double straps and an aluminum slotted cleat and my feet are more secure than anything out there. It's an advantage in sprint events. The advantage of clipless is you get most of the retention of a strap setup, but you don't have to futze with the strap; you have to loosen them when you go to get your foot out and your foot falls asleep when the straps are too tight. There are a couple sprinters at my track that use clips and straps; one mass start race had one of them pulling their foot on the last lap sprint because the straps were set up too loose to keep his feet comfortable during the longer race.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Last edited by Brian Ratliff; 03-08-13 at 09:41 AM.
03-08-13, 09:31 AM
#60
South Carolina Ed
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 3,810
Bikes: Holdsworth custom, Macario Pro, Ciocc San Cristobal, Viner Nemo, Cyfac Le Mythique, Giant TCR, Tommasso Mondial, Cyfac Etoile
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 314 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times
in
109 Posts
A high end modern bike is not going to turn a plow horse into a thorobred. And stronger riders will beat weaker riders even with inferior equipment.
But at the margin with 2 virtually equal riders, the 5lbs, the better shifting, the more aero is going to be the difference.
But at the margin with 2 virtually equal riders, the 5lbs, the better shifting, the more aero is going to be the difference.
03-08-13, 09:33 AM
#61
South Carolina Ed
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 3,810
Bikes: Holdsworth custom, Macario Pro, Ciocc San Cristobal, Viner Nemo, Cyfac Le Mythique, Giant TCR, Tommasso Mondial, Cyfac Etoile
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 314 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times
in
109 Posts
03-08-13, 09:36 AM
#62
Senior Member
Once you have barcons, and STI is invented, it's a small step and a huge advantage to switch to STI.
A lot of the OPs discussion is a simple exercise in confusing "sufficient" with "optimal". The newer stuff is closer to your optimal bike than the older stuff; however, the old stuff is sufficient. There is no racer throughout history who will give up the chance to ride a modern 2013 bike and components. Warp time and give Coppi or Merckx or Hinault a high end 2013 road bike in the middle of their respective careers and they'd kiss you on all four cheeks.
A lot of the OPs discussion is a simple exercise in confusing "sufficient" with "optimal". The newer stuff is closer to your optimal bike than the older stuff; however, the old stuff is sufficient. There is no racer throughout history who will give up the chance to ride a modern 2013 bike and components. Warp time and give Coppi or Merckx or Hinault a high end 2013 road bike in the middle of their respective careers and they'd kiss you on all four cheeks.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Last edited by Brian Ratliff; 03-08-13 at 09:40 AM.
03-08-13, 09:39 AM
#63
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,206
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
40 Posts
Barçons work great but it's still not as convenient to shift as STI and if you're in a competitive situation being able to be in exactly the right gear all the time is a benefit.
03-08-13, 09:51 AM
#64
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,780
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1145 Post(s)
Liked 774 Times
in
513 Posts
Once you have barcons, and STI is invented, it's a small step and a huge advantage to switch to STI.
A lot of the OPs discussion is a simple exercise in confusing "sufficient" with "optimal". The newer stuff is closer to your optimal bike than the older stuff; however, the old stuff is sufficient. There is no racer throughout history who will give up the chance to ride a modern 2013 bike and components. Warp time and give Coppi or Merckx or Hinault a high end 2013 road bike in the middle of their respective careers and they'd kiss you on all four cheeks.
A lot of the OPs discussion is a simple exercise in confusing "sufficient" with "optimal". The newer stuff is closer to your optimal bike than the older stuff; however, the old stuff is sufficient. There is no racer throughout history who will give up the chance to ride a modern 2013 bike and components. Warp time and give Coppi or Merckx or Hinault a high end 2013 road bike in the middle of their respective careers and they'd kiss you on all four cheeks.
But since this thread is about "race equipment", it's a lot easier to identify the advantages of certain equipment innovations.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
03-08-13, 10:08 AM
#65
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,120
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1359 Post(s)
Liked 530 Times
in
284 Posts
Cat 3 pack fodder.
For me, I'm so far from optimizing the engine that the marginal differences in equipment pale by comparison.
I've won on a steel lugged bike with D/T shifters, and I've been dropped on a$10,000 plus CF bike.
That doesn't change the fact that high end modern equipment is better than vintage, and would make a difference at the margin.
For me, I'm so far from optimizing the engine that the marginal differences in equipment pale by comparison.
I've won on a steel lugged bike with D/T shifters, and I've been dropped on a$10,000 plus CF bike.
That doesn't change the fact that high end modern equipment is better than vintage, and would make a difference at the margin.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
03-08-13, 10:11 AM
#66
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 5,855
Bikes: Scott Addict R1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2328 Post(s)
Liked 2,310 Times
in
1,171 Posts
Clincher tires of today are way better than clincher tires of old. Lighter, more supple, more grippy, less rolling resistance, higher pressure.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat
Ride, Rest, Repeat
03-08-13, 10:11 AM
#67
Senior Member
No I can't afford a new bike. But for some reason, my buddy thinks the reason he is kicking my ass on the hills is because he is riding a 17 Lb Madone and I'm riding a 22 lb steel Allez. When I point out to him that I've gained 25 lbs since college and he's only gained 5 lbs, I get "yeah, but a lighter bike would still make you faster!". It would, but I'm not going to spend 3K to change my overall weight disadvantage from + 25 lbs to only + 20 lbs. That would result in me being 3K poorer, and STILL having to watch him kick my ass up the hills.
By the way, there are plenty of younger, FATTER guys than me riding carbon fiber, and I can smoke them. I don't fault them for riding nice bikes - If I were buying one today, I might buy carbon fiber. If you're Eddy Merckx, you need the best. If you THINK you're Eddy Merckx, you're going to THINK you need the best - regardless of what that damn bathroom scale is telling you!
By the way, there are plenty of younger, FATTER guys than me riding carbon fiber, and I can smoke them. I don't fault them for riding nice bikes - If I were buying one today, I might buy carbon fiber. If you're Eddy Merckx, you need the best. If you THINK you're Eddy Merckx, you're going to THINK you need the best - regardless of what that damn bathroom scale is telling you!
03-08-13, 10:16 AM
#68
Speechless
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,802
Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If we are racing for mythical things, could we race for a unicorn too? Because back in the day, unicorns were far superior to modern horses.
03-08-13, 10:29 AM
#69
You Know!? For Kids!
I want to respond to this thread, but will refrain until my new high modulus CF keyboard arrives from Italy, in order to be able to respond better and faster.
__________________
Are you a registered member? Why not? Click here to register. It's free and only takes 27 seconds! Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.
Are you a registered member? Why not? Click here to register. It's free and only takes 27 seconds! Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.
Originally Posted by colorider
Phobias are for irrational fears. Fear of junk ripping badgers is perfectly rational. Those things are nasty.
03-08-13, 10:34 AM
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,884
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
you must be a union rep for the unicorns (unioncorn); everybody knows that horses faced widespread discrimination and were constantly harassed due to the prevalent unicorn nationalism.
03-08-13, 10:35 AM
#71
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,525
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1030 Post(s)
Liked 1,709 Times
in
1,178 Posts
If that's what you believe, you're wrong. The majority of mid to high end owners spend the money for the enjoyment of owning the bike.
03-08-13, 10:36 AM
#72
You Know!? For Kids!
If I want to go faster, I just wax my chain more.
__________________
Are you a registered member? Why not? Click here to register. It's free and only takes 27 seconds! Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.
Are you a registered member? Why not? Click here to register. It's free and only takes 27 seconds! Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.
Originally Posted by colorider
Phobias are for irrational fears. Fear of junk ripping badgers is perfectly rational. Those things are nasty.
03-08-13, 10:38 AM
#73
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 40,703
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 548 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20342 Post(s)
Liked 7,075 Times
in
3,312 Posts
I agree they ride much better. Not sure how much of a difference it makes in time, but certainly better road feel, etc.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
03-08-13, 10:38 AM
#74
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,525
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1030 Post(s)
Liked 1,709 Times
in
1,178 Posts
03-08-13, 10:40 AM
#75
Speechless
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,802
Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
You are clearly a Revisionist. The horn was a significant aero advantage, as well as a convenient bottle opener.
