Campy - keep 10s or go 11?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Campy - keep 10s or go 11?
What would you do… I am moving to Honolulu early next year. The plan was to just take the frame then buy parts and rebuild it there.
I am running a 2009 Campagnolo Veloce group with a FSA Gossamer compact crank. So it has skeleton brakes and ultra shift levers. I don’t race and, in fact, don’t even really like riding with other people so I have been reasonably satisfied with my setup. The front shifting isn’t great. I don’t know if it is the Veloce or the FSA or combination of the two, but Tokyo is very flat so I’m always in the 50.
I can’t decide if I should keep the Veloce shifters, brakes, and derailleurs - updating the cassette and crank to 10s Centaur (they are due for replacement anyway) or just go 11s. I don’t think the Veloce shifters will last forever, can’t be rebuilt, and can only be replaced with power shift (I’m not going to f* around with finding replacements on eBay - I prefer having a warranty).
I figured Record it isn’t that much more than Chorus and may be easier to maintain having bearings in some places rather than bushings, ceramic in the crank, a bit more Ti so it won’t rust as easily… Are the shifters still rebuildable? Anyway, as you can see, I’m rather frugal. I don’t want to throw cash around, but don’t mind paying for the right thing which I will get a lot of use out of.
So what do you think:
1 - Keep 10sp —> Are the shifters reliability a weak link here? Would the front shifting improve with a new Centaur front derailleur in addition to Centaur crank?
2 - Go 11sp —> Is Record longer lasting (reliable/rebuildable) than Chorus?
I don’t want this thread to digress as so many others have, but Shimano and Sram aren’t options.
I am running a 2009 Campagnolo Veloce group with a FSA Gossamer compact crank. So it has skeleton brakes and ultra shift levers. I don’t race and, in fact, don’t even really like riding with other people so I have been reasonably satisfied with my setup. The front shifting isn’t great. I don’t know if it is the Veloce or the FSA or combination of the two, but Tokyo is very flat so I’m always in the 50.
I can’t decide if I should keep the Veloce shifters, brakes, and derailleurs - updating the cassette and crank to 10s Centaur (they are due for replacement anyway) or just go 11s. I don’t think the Veloce shifters will last forever, can’t be rebuilt, and can only be replaced with power shift (I’m not going to f* around with finding replacements on eBay - I prefer having a warranty).
I figured Record it isn’t that much more than Chorus and may be easier to maintain having bearings in some places rather than bushings, ceramic in the crank, a bit more Ti so it won’t rust as easily… Are the shifters still rebuildable? Anyway, as you can see, I’m rather frugal. I don’t want to throw cash around, but don’t mind paying for the right thing which I will get a lot of use out of.
So what do you think:
1 - Keep 10sp —> Are the shifters reliability a weak link here? Would the front shifting improve with a new Centaur front derailleur in addition to Centaur crank?
2 - Go 11sp —> Is Record longer lasting (reliable/rebuildable) than Chorus?
I don’t want this thread to digress as so many others have, but Shimano and Sram aren’t options.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 2,751
Bikes: Merlin Extra Light, Orbea Orca, Ritchey Outback,Tomac Revolver Mountain Bike, Cannondale Crit 3.0 now used for time trials.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 126 Post(s)
Liked 55 Times
in
34 Posts
I don't think that you will find any longevity difference between the two groups. Both are excellent.
#4
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
I'm a Campy rider, but if you are thinking about changing out a lot of your groupset, you are doing yourself a disservice to not consider Ultegra 6800 or riding a new Red or Force groupset. Here's the thing. If you have a Campy rear wheel, you don't have to change it with a Ultegra 6800 groupset. If you put a Campy 11s rear cassette on your bike, it will shift fine with either new 11s Shimano or Sram groupsets.
An open mind is a good thing.
A couple of more points.
Choice of Campy has a lot to do with what kind of bike you ride and BB you have. Campy is pretty awful for adapting cranks to BB30...but can be done with a bit of work...and also Campy is putting out a new BB30 crank for 2014.
My opinion and shared by some other tech heads is...low end 11s Campy sucks. Athena is Power Torque and that crank sucks with a taper spline and single shift somewhat defeats the benefit of Campy.
11s Chorus is wonderful. So is Record of course. I personally agree with Bob as I generally do and would opt for Chorus.
There has never been another time in history when bike tech has been so good and there are so many great options. In my opinon, three years ago Campy blew all competition out of the water with high end groupsets...wasn't close. This is no longer the case. All three groupset makers now make excellent products so a harder decision now than ever before. Other good news is, its harder to make a mistake.
An open mind is a good thing.
A couple of more points.
Choice of Campy has a lot to do with what kind of bike you ride and BB you have. Campy is pretty awful for adapting cranks to BB30...but can be done with a bit of work...and also Campy is putting out a new BB30 crank for 2014.
My opinion and shared by some other tech heads is...low end 11s Campy sucks. Athena is Power Torque and that crank sucks with a taper spline and single shift somewhat defeats the benefit of Campy.
11s Chorus is wonderful. So is Record of course. I personally agree with Bob as I generally do and would opt for Chorus.
There has never been another time in history when bike tech has been so good and there are so many great options. In my opinon, three years ago Campy blew all competition out of the water with high end groupsets...wasn't close. This is no longer the case. All three groupset makers now make excellent products so a harder decision now than ever before. Other good news is, its harder to make a mistake.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,791
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1020 Post(s)
Liked 463 Times
in
293 Posts
I have Athena 11sp in my Bottecchia. I have Record 11sp in the Infinito and C59. Both groupset are reliable and perform well under all circumstances.
I have no experience with Chorus, but I ride with people who own it and are very happy with it.
I have never heard anyone, techie or otherwise, state that Athena is a bad groupset.
YMMV
Good luck, ride safely and happy Thanksgiving.
I have no experience with Chorus, but I ride with people who own it and are very happy with it.
I have never heard anyone, techie or otherwise, state that Athena is a bad groupset.
YMMV
Good luck, ride safely and happy Thanksgiving.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
If you go with Record, get a Chorus FD. The Record carbon cage tends to delaminate and get chewed up. The weight penalty of the Chorus FD is a whopping two grams.
IME, 11 speed shifts better than 10. Athena Powershift works just fine but the single shifting is a bit of a disappointment. The Athena crank doesn't "suck", it's just a less elegant design than Ultratorque.
IME, 11 speed shifts better than 10. Athena Powershift works just fine but the single shifting is a bit of a disappointment. The Athena crank doesn't "suck", it's just a less elegant design than Ultratorque.
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
#9
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Also, not easy to find 10s with multiple shift capability....2010 Centaur was the last year...I own it btw and it is very good. 2009 Centaur RH shifter was pretty awful...I owned that as well.
Chorus is the sweet spot I believe...buy it out of the UK.
#10
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
If you go with Record, get a Chorus FD. The Record carbon cage tends to delaminate and get chewed up. The weight penalty of the Chorus FD is a whopping two grams.
IME, 11 speed shifts better than 10. Athena Powershift works just fine but the single shifting is a bit of a disappointment. The Athena crank doesn't "suck", it's just a less elegant design than Ultratorque.
IME, 11 speed shifts better than 10. Athena Powershift works just fine but the single shifting is a bit of a disappointment. The Athena crank doesn't "suck", it's just a less elegant design than Ultratorque.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
There is elegance, aka simplicity and there is function. PT cranks suck because a subset...depending on tolerance, creak. Yours apparently doesn't. UT is much easier to service and more solid by design...no press fit...line to line hirth joint and more robust. No puller to remove the left crank arm. A tapered spline...only one like it on the market, is needless and problematic...or can be. Glad you are happy with yours. I wouldn't own one.
A subset of every BB/crankset design ever made creaks. PT is light, stiff, functional, and serviceable. It's fine.
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
#12
Senior Member
What would you do… I am moving to Honolulu early next year. The plan was to just take the frame then buy parts and rebuild it there.
I am running a 2009 Campagnolo Veloce group with a FSA Gossamer compact crank. So it has skeleton brakes and ultra shift levers. I don’t race and, in fact, don’t even really like riding with other people so I have been reasonably satisfied with my setup. The front shifting isn’t great. I don’t know if it is the Veloce or the FSA or combination of the two, but Tokyo is very flat so I’m always in the 50.
I can’t decide if I should keep the Veloce shifters, brakes, and derailleurs - updating the cassette and crank to 10s Centaur (they are due for replacement anyway) or just go 11s. I don’t think the Veloce shifters will last forever, can’t be rebuilt, and can only be replaced with power shift (I’m not going to f* around with finding replacements on eBay - I prefer having a warranty).
I figured Record it isn’t that much more than Chorus and may be easier to maintain having bearings in some places rather than bushings, ceramic in the crank, a bit more Ti so it won’t rust as easily… Are the shifters still rebuildable? Anyway, as you can see, I’m rather frugal. I don’t want to throw cash around, but don’t mind paying for the right thing which I will get a lot of use out of.
So what do you think:
1 - Keep 10sp —> Are the shifters reliability a weak link here? Would the front shifting improve with a new Centaur front derailleur in addition to Centaur crank?
2 - Go 11sp —> Is Record longer lasting (reliable/rebuildable) than Chorus?
I don’t want this thread to digress as so many others have, but Shimano and Sram aren’t options.
I am running a 2009 Campagnolo Veloce group with a FSA Gossamer compact crank. So it has skeleton brakes and ultra shift levers. I don’t race and, in fact, don’t even really like riding with other people so I have been reasonably satisfied with my setup. The front shifting isn’t great. I don’t know if it is the Veloce or the FSA or combination of the two, but Tokyo is very flat so I’m always in the 50.
I can’t decide if I should keep the Veloce shifters, brakes, and derailleurs - updating the cassette and crank to 10s Centaur (they are due for replacement anyway) or just go 11s. I don’t think the Veloce shifters will last forever, can’t be rebuilt, and can only be replaced with power shift (I’m not going to f* around with finding replacements on eBay - I prefer having a warranty).
I figured Record it isn’t that much more than Chorus and may be easier to maintain having bearings in some places rather than bushings, ceramic in the crank, a bit more Ti so it won’t rust as easily… Are the shifters still rebuildable? Anyway, as you can see, I’m rather frugal. I don’t want to throw cash around, but don’t mind paying for the right thing which I will get a lot of use out of.
So what do you think:
1 - Keep 10sp —> Are the shifters reliability a weak link here? Would the front shifting improve with a new Centaur front derailleur in addition to Centaur crank?
2 - Go 11sp —> Is Record longer lasting (reliable/rebuildable) than Chorus?
I don’t want this thread to digress as so many others have, but Shimano and Sram aren’t options.
With all my Campy front derailleurs, except for the Record one that came with the only bike I bought complete since eons ago, the front derailleurs are not optimal when they arrive from the factory. They sacrifice some shifting force for versatility. I keep my front derailleur as low as possible (1-2mm clearance to rings). I a;sp slightly squeeze the two ears in front together, making the gap there narrower. This really improves shift response - it's my favorite trick for a rear derailleur.
If the front derailleur has a lot of slop then the pivots may be worn. In that case, if you can't take up the slop using cable tension, then a new front derailleur will work better.
You mention the cassette and cranks need replacing. Cassette I understand. Chainrings I understand, especially with a compact (since shifting across a bigger gap, like 16T, wears rings more than shifting across a small gap). Cranks, not so much. Yes, I've replaced Centaur cranks when they were too "un-straight". However if it's due to shifting then you probably need just rings. If you're looking for Record quality rings (and such thicker and stiffer rings really make a difference) then you can get cold forged Praxis rings. They make normal compact rings (50/34) but they also make the mid-compact (52/36). Thicker stiffer rings really make a difference. If you compare a Record/Chorus to a non-Record/Chorus ring there's a huge difference in material thickness and stiffness. This translates to a straighter ring for the good rings, and the chainrings deflect less when shifting. This is why the first generation of Red rings didn't win a lot of fans.
New rings will improve shifting up front because you have new/solid tooth profiles. Usually you have a new chain as well and that helps too.
10s Campy user. I use Praxis rings (Cannondale SI crankarms, both of them). My primary bike has new style Centaur 10s shifters although I have a number of Record/Chorus older body 10s shifters, including one set of my secondary bike (which was my primary for a couple years). I have metal caged front derailleurs, all pinched as described above. I have a Record front derailleur but I don't remember if it's on a bike or in a box.
One of my previous bike upgrades, about 10 years ago, was to put Chorus rings on Centaur cranks. Later I got the right length cranks and put Record arms on them. I didn't manage to wear out the Record rings before getting the Cannondale cranks (on a BB30 Cannondale bike). Last time someone wore out Record rings that I knew of they used them about 10 years.
I'm similar to you in budget thoughts. I won't spend money unnecessarily but I'll try things and I try to get good things when I spend money.
I hope this helps.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
#13
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 33,029
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Mentioned: 325 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11983 Post(s)
Liked 6,702 Times
in
3,503 Posts
Keep the 10s, save the money for a rainy day.
Rain usually happens unexpectedly.
Rain usually happens unexpectedly.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
I can’t decide if I should keep the Veloce shifters, brakes, and derailleurs - updating the cassette and crank to 10s Centaur (they are due for replacement anyway) or just go 11s. I don’t think the Veloce shifters will last forever, can’t be rebuilt, and can only be replaced with power shift (I’m not going to f* around with finding replacements on eBay - I prefer having a warranty).
I'd expect them to last a very long time with the move to the new shift mechanism using a detent ball that rolls over the index notches instead of the G-spring which scrapes and wears.
I figured Record it isn’t that much more than Chorus and may be easier to maintain having bearings in some places rather than bushings, ceramic in the crank, a bit more Ti so it won’t rust as easily… Are the shifters still rebuildable?
1 - Keep 10sp —> Are the shifters reliability a weak link here? Would the front shifting improve with a new Centaur front derailleur in addition to Centaur crank?
Campagnolo and Shimano do a better job with pins, ramps, and down shift zones although my FSA 50-34 Carbon Pro Compact crank ran fine.
2 - Go 11sp —> Is Record longer lasting (reliable/rebuildable) than Chorus?
Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 11-28-13 at 01:06 PM.
#17
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Hiatus? Charm school? All I said, is a there is a right product for everybody and PT has found a good home at your house.
I have had my Chorus UT crank since 2006 and have had it off to clean regrease the bearings once a year since then...so about 7 times...at least. Countless miles. Original bearings. 10mm hex. Pop. What a great design. All I am saying is that PT is so far in the rear view mirror that it isn't even funny. What a PITA to have to use a puller to get the left crank arm off every time you want to regrease the bearings...not to mention, it depends on an interference fit...a taper no less. Ghost of square taper which died for a reason. A vestige of a joke from Campy's engineers to the bicycle community. A perfect distance cousin to Campy's notorious one bolt seat post. I like Campy. Every company has lemons. Campy has been more perfect in fact than Shimano over the years...as they should be with their lineage and of course upstart Sram who is learning incredibly fast. Reason for an outliar design like PT is likely for patent avoidance and saving a nickel if not dollar for every crank sold. Certainly not cost justification for the tremendous difference in design robustness. I mean who would design such an albatross that didn't do a lot of acid as a youth? UT by contrast has to be one of the best cranks every created. Line to line. As good if not better than even DA which is outstanding only more beautiful than DA. DA mounts much easier to BB30 of course. But Campy is addressing that in 2014.
I have had my Chorus UT crank since 2006 and have had it off to clean regrease the bearings once a year since then...so about 7 times...at least. Countless miles. Original bearings. 10mm hex. Pop. What a great design. All I am saying is that PT is so far in the rear view mirror that it isn't even funny. What a PITA to have to use a puller to get the left crank arm off every time you want to regrease the bearings...not to mention, it depends on an interference fit...a taper no less. Ghost of square taper which died for a reason. A vestige of a joke from Campy's engineers to the bicycle community. A perfect distance cousin to Campy's notorious one bolt seat post. I like Campy. Every company has lemons. Campy has been more perfect in fact than Shimano over the years...as they should be with their lineage and of course upstart Sram who is learning incredibly fast. Reason for an outliar design like PT is likely for patent avoidance and saving a nickel if not dollar for every crank sold. Certainly not cost justification for the tremendous difference in design robustness. I mean who would design such an albatross that didn't do a lot of acid as a youth? UT by contrast has to be one of the best cranks every created. Line to line. As good if not better than even DA which is outstanding only more beautiful than DA. DA mounts much easier to BB30 of course. But Campy is addressing that in 2014.
Last edited by Campag4life; 11-28-13 at 02:02 PM.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I have had my Chorus UT crank since 2006 and have had it off to clean regrease the bearings once a year since then...so about 7 times...at least. Countless miles. Original bearings. 10mm hex. Pop. What a great design. All I am saying is that PT is so far in the rear view mirror that it isn't even funny. What a PITA to have to use a puller to get the left crank arm off every time you want to regrease the bearings...not to mention, it depends on an interference fit...a taper no less. Ghost of square taper which died for a reason. A vestige of a joke from Campy's engineers to the bicycle community. A perfect distance cousin to Campy's notorious one bolt seat post. I like Campy. Every company has lemons. Campy has been more perfect in fact than Shimano over the years...as they should be with their lineage and of course upstart Sram who is learning incredibly fast. Reason for an outliar design like PT is likely for patent avoidance and saving a nickel if not dollar for every crank sold. Certainly not cost justification for the tremendous difference in design robustness. I mean who would design such an albatross that didn't do a lot of acid as a youth? UT by contrast has to be one of the best cranks every created. Line to line. As good if not better than even DA which is outstanding only more beautiful than DA. DA mounts much easier to BB30 of course. But Campy is addressing that in 2014.
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Agreed, but....
it it doesn't sound like the OP has any need for it. If I were him, I would stay 10 and upgrade to a campy crankset. A far as what style? Depends on application and budget. All my bikes are either square taper or ultra torque. None of the options are bad, but I like some more than others.
it it doesn't sound like the OP has any need for it. If I were him, I would stay 10 and upgrade to a campy crankset. A far as what style? Depends on application and budget. All my bikes are either square taper or ultra torque. None of the options are bad, but I like some more than others.
#20
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Pullers are great fun. Especially when all other cranks in the industry come apart without one. Oh, there is a special tool here and there...including new Campy BB30 which will require one. At least, PT doesn't have a removal spider...lol.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
So special tools are preferable to a general shop tool? OK.
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
#22
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
I am not quite ready to embrace the insidious notion that bike companies are in business to make money and therefore create products that require special tools to create an addendum revenue stream for every unit sold. There maybe some truth to it however.
The debate about design can never be answered for the simple reason that there is no such thing. What matters is...after surveying the landscape of different products, that you are comfortable with what you bought. I would ride Shimano or Sram before Athena.
The debate about design can never be answered for the simple reason that there is no such thing. What matters is...after surveying the landscape of different products, that you are comfortable with what you bought. I would ride Shimano or Sram before Athena.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have 10sp Record and 11sp Super Record. I prefer the 10sp because the spacing is more shift-friendly. I also prefer the clunkier feel of shifting. Overall, SR record has more carbon bits, and I feel because of the 11sp doesn't shift as well. It is not uncommon to miss a shift every now and then. I've worked on many SR11 bikes all with the same issue.
I've also owned Centaur 10, Chorus 10 and Centaur 11. All of them work, no company makes a product that doesn't work intentionally. But my preference is still for Record 10, again due to shifting accuracy and feel.
I've also owned Centaur 10, Chorus 10 and Centaur 11. All of them work, no company makes a product that doesn't work intentionally. But my preference is still for Record 10, again due to shifting accuracy and feel.
Which Campy 11s do you own and can you comment on why you prefer 10s?
Also, not easy to find 10s with multiple shift capability....2010 Centaur was the last year...I own it btw and it is very good. 2009 Centaur RH shifter was pretty awful...I owned that as well.
Chorus is the sweet spot I believe...buy it out of the UK.
Also, not easy to find 10s with multiple shift capability....2010 Centaur was the last year...I own it btw and it is very good. 2009 Centaur RH shifter was pretty awful...I owned that as well.
Chorus is the sweet spot I believe...buy it out of the UK.
#24
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
I have 10sp Record and 11sp Super Record. I prefer the 10sp because the spacing is more shift-friendly. I also prefer the clunkier feel of shifting. Overall, SR record has more carbon bits, and I feel because of the 11sp doesn't shift as well. It is not uncommon to miss a shift every now and then. I've worked on many SR11 bikes all with the same issue.
I've also owned Centaur 10, Chorus 10 and Centaur 11. All of them work, no company makes a product that doesn't work intentionally. But my preference is still for Record 10, again due to shifting accuracy and feel.
I've also owned Centaur 10, Chorus 10 and Centaur 11. All of them work, no company makes a product that doesn't work intentionally. But my preference is still for Record 10, again due to shifting accuracy and feel.
#25
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times
in
41 Posts
As an example, Novatec has a ratchet ring tool. We wanted some for our consumer site. Novatec didn't have any. They didn't have any in production and no one was assigned to get it done. So we made the drawing, found the vendor and supplied the tool to them. We also ordered more than they did.
Even when I worked for a company that distributed Campagnolo this was the case. In five years we never sold a single Campagnolo tool kit. We had the UT bearing tools in our service center but only a handful of shops even invested in them. I don't know if any consumer ever did.
Now speciality companies like Park or Hosan might be selling these tools but that isn't making a dime for any of the bike companies.