Frames
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 0
From: Brownsville, TX
Bikes: Surly CC
Frames
If you were building a mileage-based setup, which frame would you go for?
Surly Steamroller
Bareknuckle
Remember, this isn't about short sprints or velodrome riding, this is about putting in 50-150 milers on a bike designed exclusively around being a 48x15 roadworthy pig.
Surly Steamroller
Bareknuckle
Remember, this isn't about short sprints or velodrome riding, this is about putting in 50-150 milers on a bike designed exclusively around being a 48x15 roadworthy pig.
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 12
From: Philadelphia
Bikes: Surly CreamRoller. 98 Giant Rincon. SE UVT
I own a steamroller and I really think I could ride it as far as I needed to without any pain or problems. I never rode a bk so I can't comment on that frame but I only my Surly. Most comfortable bike i've ever ridden i'll never sell it.
#3
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 0
From: Brownsville, TX
Bikes: Surly CC
Yeah, I traded a black BK I had earlier this year because it wasn't the right size for me. I am trying to come up with a good "travel" bike that I can put miles on and still have fun. I have the Handsome Devil which is tits, but I want something that is A. designed for fixed-gear (trackdrops) and B. Not such an aggressive geometry that I can't carry around 30 lbs. in my bags.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 273
Likes: 48
From: Brazil, Londrina PR
Bikes: Kona Unit, Kona Kahuna, Kona Dew DL, Scott Big Jon, Trek Checkpoint ALR4, KHS Urban Soul, Haro Team Issue, GT Force Expert Carbon, Bernardi Quadra.
Any bike that fits you well should be fine, I was trying to figure the same thing last year and my options were the Steamroller and the All-City Big Block.
I went for the Big Block based on the geometry, Surly's head tube seemed a tad short for my liking.
I went for the Big Block based on the geometry, Surly's head tube seemed a tad short for my liking.
#7
#11
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Flagler Palm Coast, FL
Bikes: 1986 Fuji Allegro 12 Spd; 2015 Bianchi Kuma 27.2 24 Spd; 1997 Fuji MX-200 21 Spd; 2010 Vilano SS/FG 46/16
I'd go with the Steamroller because it's essentially the same geometry, cost & quality are similar & is name brand.
#12
lots of steel road bikes have integrated screws that help you center the wheel and have a set position in the drop out.
#13
Banned.
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,287
Likes: 837
I know. But he's running what look like some type of MKS-style Chain Tensioner (similar to this). It can be seen in this picture:
https://www.pedalroom.com/p/handsome-...vil-4457_2.jpg
I've just never seen anyone use those with that style dropout and was curious if he found an advantage to doing so.
https://www.pedalroom.com/p/handsome-...vil-4457_2.jpg
I've just never seen anyone use those with that style dropout and was curious if he found an advantage to doing so.
#14
steep vs relaxed
$700 vs $420
dedacciai COM 12.5 cromo vs "surly" 4130 cromo
italian made vs taiwainese made
EAI carries a higher prestige than Surly, not sure what you're on about.
Last edited by TheRealFaux; 04-30-12 at 10:00 PM. Reason: did not realize surlys were also handmade
#15
I know. But he's running what look like some type of MKS-style Chain Tensioner (similar to this). It can be seen in this picture:
https://www.pedalroom.com/p/handsome-...vil-4457_2.jpg
I've just never seen anyone use those with that style dropout and was curious if he found an advantage to doing so.
https://www.pedalroom.com/p/handsome-...vil-4457_2.jpg
I've just never seen anyone use those with that style dropout and was curious if he found an advantage to doing so.
#16
doesnt that tensioner fit between the frame and the axel and a lip pulls on the back of the dropout to tension the chain? Could still work just fine.
Pulled a wheel a few time on my Surly cross-check after some hasty flat changes so i can see how it may help.
Pulled a wheel a few time on my Surly cross-check after some hasty flat changes so i can see how it may help.
Last edited by thenomad; 04-30-12 at 09:56 PM.
#17
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Flagler Palm Coast, FL
Bikes: 1986 Fuji Allegro 12 Spd; 2015 Bianchi Kuma 27.2 24 Spd; 1997 Fuji MX-200 21 Spd; 2010 Vilano SS/FG 46/16
I'm just saying for the money, save the $ 280 on the frame and put that into components. After riding it 50+ miles the prestige of the frame wears off after the first mile(s) ? Ride is going to be contingent upon the seat, handle bars & grips, tires and air pressure, also how smooth the road is. They just paved the street with new asphalt after grading it down to dirt in front of my place, even a hi-ten wal-mart frame rides sweet on that.
Last edited by fuji86; 04-30-12 at 09:57 PM.
#18
By prestige I meant better reputation, not ride quality(?). I was just pointing out how you said Surly was a household name (implying good quality). EAI actually makes higher quality products than compared to Surly. An Eddy Merckx or Serotta could be ridden thousands of miles and it damn sure will be more prestigious than someone's new Kilo TT.
Last edited by TheRealFaux; 04-30-12 at 10:10 PM.
#19
Your cog is slipping.



Joined: May 2009
Posts: 26,053
Likes: 100
From: Beverly MA
Bikes: EAI Bareknuckle
#20
i smell bacon
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,574
Likes: 1
Bikes: Geekhouse Deerfield, GT Edge Ti, Spooky Skeletor, TET Track, Ritchey P-650b, Bridgestone MB-3
So do materials.
And finish.
Unless you mean to tell me I should ditch my TET and keep my Kilo TT since they have essentially the same geometry, are both steel and Mercier is actually a more well-known brand.
#21
#23
Why not something more road oriented? You won't need a high BB, real short cranks, fast whippy handling, cramped cockpit, but could appreciate a road geometry even if its "race" oriented road.
I havent compared the geometry charts but thats the first thing in my mind.
#24
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Flagler Palm Coast, FL
Bikes: 1986 Fuji Allegro 12 Spd; 2015 Bianchi Kuma 27.2 24 Spd; 1997 Fuji MX-200 21 Spd; 2010 Vilano SS/FG 46/16
Have you fit this particular fellow's body ? Maybe the few degrees or millimeters on any of the dimensions and the Surly is more comfortable for him ? People come in all shapes and sizes. I mean we're talking about an inseam, body torso length, even arm length that varies. And tell me 50-150 mile ride that anyone is going to know the difference on 48/15 gearing ? I mean this is a long trip rider for 50-150 miles, it's not a few hundred or even kilo meter race on a velodrome or even on a rural paved street. I know Retrogression sells the EAI's, but what about the Dodeci Gara, Leader X Pedal Consumption or even a Toyo Godzilla at about the same price to + $ 100 more than a Bareknuckle. I guess you don't sell the Surly, so you're SOL on that sale. But I bet he might not be all that disappointed in the All City for about what he puts into a Surly frame ? Go one further, Bianchi super pista frame runs what and/or plus what the EAI's do too, depending upon where you shop ? All else being equal components wise and he can put a heck of a more comfortable seat under his butt and what is that worth ? Is it the difference in the frame pricing ? Most anything that is transportation is a system of the whole rather than just the frame. I know that you are very knowledgable and I respect that to a certain extent, but with all due respect what level rider is this fellow, maybe his legs and back are going to be screaming for mercy on any of them after riding those distances ?
#25
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Flagler Palm Coast, FL
Bikes: 1986 Fuji Allegro 12 Spd; 2015 Bianchi Kuma 27.2 24 Spd; 1997 Fuji MX-200 21 Spd; 2010 Vilano SS/FG 46/16
BTW, my bad on the cost, the Surly is a bargain in comparison. I posted that too hastily without proofreading. I stand though, that for value quality and intangibles, the Surly is still what I'd purchase of the two and then I'd put better components on the Surly and come up with a total sum of parts ride that would be preferrable to sinking all my money into a frame that has no suspension. I mean fatter 700c tires are going to offset any perception that one frame rides better than the other. I'd rather ride a touring/road geared bike that distance over a SS/FG track bike and "thenomad" comes out and suggests that in his post.




