Racer Tech Thread
#2776
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,588
Likes: 427
From: Southern California, USA
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
i don't own them, but i read about them here.
this comment from someone who has been using them a while was interesting (or scary, depending on your POV):

curious for what you find, esp as the author of that site tends to do testing that focuses more on what triathletes want vs competitive cyclists (e.g., he seems to care mainly about average power over longer durations and not response to changes in power and cadence over shorter durations based on reading years of his reviews). that he is noting the settling issue is, well, noteworthy for that reason.
this comment from someone who has been using them a while was interesting (or scary, depending on your POV):
curious for what you find, esp as the author of that site tends to do testing that focuses more on what triathletes want vs competitive cyclists (e.g., he seems to care mainly about average power over longer durations and not response to changes in power and cadence over shorter durations based on reading years of his reviews). that he is noting the settling issue is, well, noteworthy for that reason.
#2777
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,588
Likes: 427
From: Southern California, USA
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
While I'm sure you know the difference between the terms accuracy and precision, it is mostly precision I care about. The accuracy part is just useful for posting to forums or trying to convince USAC coaches you can ride. I'd take a race result over a number from any device any day.
#2779
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
The Moxy is the other one I learned about here. As this just goes in one place I'll never know the numbers it gives attached to the arm or head.
While I'm sure you know the difference between the terms accuracy and precision, it is mostly precision I care about. The accuracy part is just useful for posting to forums or trying to convince USAC coaches you can ride. I'd take a race result over a number from any device any day.
While I'm sure you know the difference between the terms accuracy and precision, it is mostly precision I care about. The accuracy part is just useful for posting to forums or trying to convince USAC coaches you can ride. I'd take a race result over a number from any device any day.
if you're using that tool for MLSS it could be interesting, but i'm guessing given the fact that you have schools evaluating your boy based on -- in theory -- actual lactate values (they do blood tests, right?), you maybe should care about accuracy in addition to precision.
ymmv.
#2780
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,588
Likes: 427
From: Southern California, USA
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
No - evaluations are based on erg times - Concept 2. Just like in cycling selection is based on ITT times. For soccer GKs it is saves.
Just the way it is they select on numbers, not wins. I don't think it is correct to select that way, but that pretty much is how they select.
It is easier for coaches that don't know what they are trying to achieve.
Just the way it is they select on numbers, not wins. I don't think it is correct to select that way, but that pretty much is how they select.
It is easier for coaches that don't know what they are trying to achieve.
#2781
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,546
Likes: 5
From: Boulder, CO
#2783
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
No - evaluations are based on erg times - Concept 2. Just like in cycling selection is based on ITT times. For soccer GKs it is saves.
Just the way it is they select on numbers, not wins. I don't think it is correct to select that way, but that pretty much is how they select.
It is easier for coaches that don't know what they are trying to achieve.
Just the way it is they select on numbers, not wins. I don't think it is correct to select that way, but that pretty much is how they select.
It is easier for coaches that don't know what they are trying to achieve.
assumed that meant that BL was something coaches at least look at, and if they are looking at it, that means you want to look at it as well. but if they're looking at different numbers than you are......well, there's your 'accuracy matters' bit.
#2784
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,588
Likes: 427
From: Southern California, USA
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
I did. He was talking how the Russians were selecting and his numbers. No college I know of (I don't know that many and there are only a few for lightweight) does that for selection.
I'm sure if junior has a good number I'll let him know, as I let him know about VO2 max and cycling power. They all cross to a degree.
It is all erg and to some degree winning in a boat with a team - OR single skull winning, but most juniors do not single skull.
I'm sure if junior has a good number I'll let him know, as I let him know about VO2 max and cycling power. They all cross to a degree.
It is all erg and to some degree winning in a boat with a team - OR single skull winning, but most juniors do not single skull.
#2786
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
From: four 1 OHHH , Maryland
Bikes: nagasawa, fuji track pro
#2787
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,978
Likes: 4
From: Redwood City, CA
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
#2788
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,588
Likes: 427
From: Southern California, USA
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
#2789
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 0
I did. He was talking how the Russians were selecting and his numbers. No college I know of (I don't know that many and there are only a few for lightweight) does that for selection.
I'm sure if junior has a good number I'll let him know, as I let him know about VO2 max and cycling power. They all cross to a degree.
It is all erg and to some degree winning in a boat with a team - OR single skull winning, but most juniors do not single skull.
I'm sure if junior has a good number I'll let him know, as I let him know about VO2 max and cycling power. They all cross to a degree.
It is all erg and to some degree winning in a boat with a team - OR single skull winning, but most juniors do not single skull.
Not sure why I mixed them up in the earlier post, but I knew you said that guy was measuring blood lactate concentration, and for some reason (brain fart!) i forgot Moxy, et. al. are measuring SmO2. Especially dumb as I've played with Moxy a bit.
Again, I don't know why I had my head stuck in non-invasive blood lactate measurements (which I've heard discussed) w/r/t those devices, and I clearly confused that with what you mentioned about that one coach's conversation with blood lactate measurements during a vo2max rowing test.
Sorry!
#2790
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,588
Likes: 427
From: Southern California, USA
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
NP. I'm not finding the setup all so easy as I don't Android or iOS. Still seeming the Lactate measure tells the story that HR and power do not. If it works it is the definitive number on how hard and how much an athlete can take. I can't see why having a power number would trump a Lactate number - for telling the athlete what to do.
#2792
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 89
From: East Bay Area ,CA
Bikes: not enough
NP. I'm not finding the setup all so easy as I don't Android or iOS. Still seeming the Lactate measure tells the story that HR and power do not. If it works it is the definitive number on how hard and how much an athlete can take. I can't see why having a power number would trump a Lactate number - for telling the athlete what to do.
#2794
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,588
Likes: 427
From: Southern California, USA
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
I didn't get my hands on them yet and we should have an assortment of their stuff so I'll do pictures when I get them.
#2796
That's cause we're buying the cheap stuff. If we can get enough people to meet the minimums on the San Remo, or even on the Aero Race stuff (bibs/jersey), that stuff is great if a bit delicate. I still think what you get for the price from Giordana is better, but Castelli is fine. I actually really like everything except the Team jersey, which feels very last-decade. The plus side is that durability for the Team jersey and bibs are superb, they really last. I've also been happy with the cyclocross skinsuits, for what it's worth.
#2797
That's cause we're buying the cheap stuff. If we can get enough people to meet the minimums on the San Remo, or even on the Aero Race stuff (bibs/jersey), that stuff is great if a bit delicate. I still think what you get for the price from Giordana is better, but Castelli is fine. I actually really like everything except the Team jersey, which feels very last-decade. The plus side is that durability for the Team jersey and bibs are superb, they really last. I've also been happy with the cyclocross skinsuits, for what it's worth.
my favorite custom kit mfgr by far is craft.
Last edited by mike868y; 11-09-15 at 11:42 AM.
#2798
Version 7.0


Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,844
Likes: 3,859
From: SoCa
Bikes: Road, Track, TT and Gravel


Many of the "fast" skin suits, such as Castelli, are not very durable - big depends. So be prepared to have seams rip that require repair with a special sewing machine or they are good for a couple of races. My wife, who set a UCI world record this year on the track, rode in a Champion carbon skin suit with the zipper on the back. If fit really well and seems durable. Most clothing manufacturers do not understand that women are not small men.
Whatever you get, the fit should be amazingly tight and hence, the likelihood to damage it when putting it on and taking it off.




