![]() |
Originally Posted by jeremywhitehorn
yes, that is a bit of a drag. jeff jones seems like a bit of an eccentric character too, which adds to the charm. seems to be picking up where matt chester left off. too bad MC isn't making frames any more, it would have been a dream ride for me.
where did you see a jones in real life? |
What's the deal with the extra tubes at the front end of the bike? Is it just for added strength?
|
Originally Posted by darkmother
It would be cool to run two cogs, and two chainrings. Say like 34/17 for offroad and a 36/15 for slop covered roads.
2 chainrings. 22 and 32 and a 18 and 14 cogs or something similar to that (a?)effect. One chain. It took me forever to figure out the exact combination. The idea was to ride trialsy style with the super low gearing.. (I like wheelies) then the switcheroo for the ride home. Pyze, the 2 cogs with 2mm chainline offset will work great as long as your tensioner has a good spring. +1 to non ramped teeth. Your images of new SS parts get me wet. |
Originally Posted by I_bRAD
What's the deal with the extra tubes at the front end of the bike? Is it just for added strength?
|
Originally Posted by TRaffic Jammer
Is the two SS cogs with spacers a difficult setup? I'll be running 42 in the front and with a tensioner, it would be cool to have a couple choices. Polished? Urbane? Fully down for fat tyre Leslie Spit snow rides...all we need now is a good dump of snow.
EDIT: If you are running two in the back, you might run into some trouble. Might have to change the position of the screws when you choose the other gear, or run a simple friction shifter, and cable to it to keet it tensioned where you want it for that gear. I know I know, "SHIFTER?". |
Originally Posted by cavernmech
The whole kit and kabooble is TI. Because of the flexy nature of TI the extra triangulation provides stiffness for steering response. It flexes a fair bit for give in the rough stuff. Merlin did something very similar years ago but gave up on it due to the work and cost involved.
I had my friend I'm going to be touring with over from Hamilton last weekend and he was inspecting my bike stash. He found my XTR cassette I got at the fall bike show and immediately starting telling me it was not a great choice because some of the cogs are titanium so they will wear faster. Wouldn't the titanium cogs wear slower than the Al cogs? Do I actually have to worry? |
Originally Posted by Shiznaz
If we are talking about Ti I have a question:
I had my friend I'm going to be touring with over from Hamilton last weekend and he was inspecting my bike stash. He found my XTR cassette I got at the fall bike show and immediately starting telling me it was not a great choice because some of the cogs are titanium so they will wear faster. Wouldn't the titanium cogs wear slower than the Al cogs? Do I actually have to worry? |
Originally Posted by Sirrobinofcoxly
I have heard that Ti rings wear faster, and that is why you only see them on larger cogs, because they share the chain surface more. Then why are Ti shavers the new thing? Wouldn't they become dull faster>|?
|
Originally Posted by jeremywhitehorn
i stand corrected; i was just thinking that for $2 it's probably less hassle.
|
Originally Posted by Shiznaz
I was more wondering if the bike handling would be messed up by using a longer fork.
|
Sweet. Well I'll save that one for later... Seems like an awful lot of work, most of which I can't perform myself.
|
Originally Posted by Shiznaz
If we are talking about Ti I have a question:
I had my friend I'm going to be touring with over from Hamilton last weekend and he was inspecting my bike stash. He found my XTR cassette I got at the fall bike show and immediately starting telling me it was not a great choice because some of the cogs are titanium so they will wear faster. Wouldn't the titanium cogs wear slower than the Al cogs? Do I actually have to worry? If you change your chain before it lengthens too much you can get many thousands of km out of a single cassette, ti cogs or otherwise. I would think over 10 000 km. I've had the same cassette on my road wheelset for two years-must be 10 000 km. Gone through a few chains though. |
Originally Posted by darkmother
Should be fine. Most cross forks are around 400-410mm axle to crown. Modern rigid MTB forks are typically longer than that, to match 80 mm travel suspension forks. Really old school rigid MTB forks are around, or slightly under 400 mm IIRC. You are probably talking about steepening your head and ST angles by less than 1 degree, and maybe dropping the BB height by less than 1 cm. Both things are no big deal and should actually improve the handling a bit.
400mm or less for super handling and endo mainia. Nowadays it's rare to find any quality rigid MTB forks less than 435mm. It makes me sad :( |
I don't see myself in the biggest cogs that often, especially considering its a 11-34 cassette. The big cogs will be for slugging up mountains with gear and the like, so they probably won't see too much use. We will be definitely be going under 10,000km (probably more like ~6000km), so hopefully I won't have to worry about replacing any components on the way.
|
1 Attachment(s)
To those with screen printing equipment I need some shirts made with the attached graphic, anyone want to do it for me?
|
Originally Posted by lymbzero
It's all about AXLE TO CROWN LENGTH!
400mm or less for super handling and endo mainia. Nowadays it's rare to find any quality rigid MTB forks less than 435mm. It makes me sad :( I know-it's a sad state. I can't believe I sold my Ritchey P-23-damn I wish I still had that bike....and my bontrager racelight. The racelight even had horizontal dropouts-I could have made that into a badass singlespeed. |
I recently switched out my junk wheelset for my "better" wheelset.
It still hasn't snowed, so I'm willing to ride nicer things till the slush come. I must say that hubs are so important when riding. Smooth bearings make all the difference when compared to bent axle Bull****. Tight clearances? http://closednode.net/images/bicycle...r/IMGP3254.JPG http://closednode.net/images/bicycle...r/IMGP3255.JPG I guess I won't be riding a front fender this winter. ACK! |
Originally Posted by Offhoff
To those with screen printing equipment I need some shirts made with the attached graphic, anyone want to do it for me?
You should see if they will produce and sell it at the Colbert shop! http://www.colbertnation.com/cn/eagles-nest.php |
Originally Posted by Shiznaz
I don't see myself in the biggest cogs that often, especially considering its a 11-34 cassette. The big cogs will be for slugging up mountains with gear and the like, so they probably won't see too much use. We will be definitely be going under 10,000km (probably more like ~6000km), so hopefully I won't have to worry about replacing any components on the way.
|
Originally Posted by lymbzero
I guess I won't be riding a front fender this winter. ACK!
|
JW, re: bike portland, this isn't quite as impressive but:
Janet Attard - Janet Bike Girl <S26> hand stenciled bicycle t-shirts, original bicycle art gift cards, unique gifts for that special cyclist on your holiday list found here: http://www.401richmond.net/events/marketplace.cfm via Martino's bike blog Shiz, good idea but I still want my own, plus a spoke card of that and this http://boingboing.net/images/287289316_682f92931_th.gif |
Shiznaz, what tour are you doing? Cross Canada, by chance?
|
I have a Dura Ace titanium cassette on my road bike and I have also been told that I would be better off with an Ultegra cassette for the type of riding I do (ie: not racing) as it would wear less quickly.
The rule of thumb for titanium cassettes is not to buy used. |
Originally Posted by darkmother
Yikes! :) What size tire is that?
|
Originally Posted by tovi
Shiznaz, what tour are you doing? Cross Canada, by chance?
|
Ooo.... maybe I'll have to go grab one this afternoon after my exam.... I seem to be on a coffee paraphenalia kick of late.
|
Originally Posted by Shiznaz
bah, well you did your big ride on a crazy lightweight high zoot carbon wonder road machine and seemed to make it home without the bike exploding. I'm sure I will manage with an XTR cassette in the back.
EDIT: and once that one wears out, and it will eventually, replace it with an XT or something cheaper. On my trip I went through about 2 Ultegra cassettes, and even more chains, but I was changing them on the safe side. |
Very cool. What do you think is boring about going straight across the country? The praries? If that's the case, it can be quite the opposite. Case and point: One day riding in eastern Alberta, I stopped in this random *tiny* town for a rest, and it seemed pretty dead. So dead, in fact, that not a single person was there. Just to varify this, I sat on someone's front porch for a good two hours, and not a single person was to be found or a single noise to be made. Kind of freaky, actually.
Also, in defence of the praries, they're only "boring", scenery wise, if you compare them, to, well, everything else. Rather, take it as a given that it has it's own quirks, interests, and value. The Yellowhead is a wicked road. It's built like a traffic-intensive highway, but the "shoulder" is actually wider than one of the driving lanes, so unless you're going solo, you can ride two abrest for the entire lenght with tons of room to spare. If it's not yet obvious, I did the cross-Canada thing in '03. Self supported, 8000km, from Van to St. Johns, NL. Check out www.whereisjer.com |
Originally Posted by Shiznaz
I'd like to ride north along the pacific coast from california to BC and then head east along the yellowhead highway towards home. This will be totally self supported as well.
Sounds a lot like my trip. Recommendations: Southern California is effing beautiful, and fun to ride. The best part of by trip though was riding up from Lake Louise to Jasper along the Ice Fields Parkway (border between BC/Alberta). You have to pay, but it's so worth it. it was my favorite part. |
The only reason I got the XTR in the first place was because it was cheaper than an XT cassette. I've got an XT RD as well. Ideally I'd like to not have to replace anything but the chain, tires and brake pads over the duration of the trip.
Tovi, I don't think I explained well... Its not so much the boringness, more a possible motivational issue... I have no qualms with any of the scenery either. We are going to be going east across the prairies no matter what, its just that the half way point is so close to home that I could see us losing motivation and ending the trip early (not so much a concern with me but a serious concern with my friend who often likes to just give up and end things early when possible). Starting in California with a final destination of home pretty much precludes that from happening. Thanks for the tips though, I'm looking forward to checking out your site. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:16 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.