![]() |
Originally Posted by Nagrom_
(Post 14962262)
Ignorance definitely is to blame.
That's all you can come back at me with? Just because you once saw this bike listed at 1200K, doesn't mean they are all worth that much. Put Brad Wiggins on this bike I'm sure he could make it fly....but I'm certain he would kick it over before he was caught dead on that POS. |
Originally Posted by Super6Ginsu
(Post 14962331)
That's all you can come back at me with? Just because you once saw this bike listed at 1200K, doesn't mean they are all worth that much. Put Brad Wiggins on this bike I'm sure he could make it fly....but I'm certain he would kick it over before he was caught dead on that POS.
You must be having a boring Sunday. |
bottom line....the bike sucks.
All I am saying is people post bikes that are worth so much and do so much more... At the end of the day if BRIDGESTONE was so good at making bikes they wouldn't have stopped in the 90's....They wised up and went back to making tires. |
Originally Posted by Super6Ginsu
(Post 14962360)
bottom line....the bike sucks.
All I am saying is people post bikes that are worth so much and do so much more... At the end of the day if BRIDGESTONE was so good at making bikes they wouldn't have stopped in the 90's....They wised up and went back to making tires. http://www.businesscycles.com/graphi...red_sprint.jpg So how 'bout that ignorance issue? Also, that RB-1 is easily worth 3 grand. |
Originally Posted by Super6Ginsu
(Post 14962247)
Nope, ignorance is not to blame...I am just saying that people have 3k, 5k bikes and this guys has one that's what? 250? it's a NOT in a big way.
|
Originally Posted by Super6Ginsu
(Post 14962286)
Doubtful, but I will try not to chuckle as I fly by that lame ole' circa 1991 Bridgestone in my Super-Sharp, Super 6 Cannondale...
|
Originally Posted by Nagrom_
(Post 14962367)
They didn't.
So how 'bout that ignorance issue? Also, that RB-1 is easily worth 3 grand. THAT MODEL (And I quote) 'This model is a special track bike, it is not equipped with front or rear brakes, so it cannot be ridden legally on public thoroughfares' Yeah...so how bout that ignorance? P.S. Here is the site you can find all your facts on : http://www.bscycle.co.jp/en/bridgestonebicycle_thai.pdf read it, process it, read it again just so you're sure...then you can say something. |
Originally Posted by Super6Ginsu
(Post 14962442)
Wow, so i am guessing this is the moment you think I have been schooled...I mean in the amount of time it took you to google that pic, you should've been using the time spent with you reading up on the specs...
THAT MODEL (And I quote) 'This model is a special track bike, it is not equipped with front or rear brakes, so it cannot be ridden legally on public thoroughfares' Yeah...so how bout that ignorance? P.S. Here is the site you can find all your facts on : http://www.bscycle.co.jp/en/bridgestonebicycle_thai.pdf read it, process it, read it again just so you're sure...then you can say something. |
Originally Posted by liquefied
(Post 14962373)
Man, you need to tell me where I can get these immaculate RB-1's with full Red for $250.
|
No, you googled the PIC.
I knew it was a track bike...I just thought it was funny that you decided to post a TRACK Bike. why not pick one of there other bikes that you can actually ride on the road? But since YOU are into googling your facts, i thought i might spare the painful 15 mins it would cause you by just sending you a link...from there do what you wish. |
Still waiting on your pic, big boy.
|
Originally Posted by Super6Ginsu
(Post 14962442)
Wow, so i am guessing this is the moment you think I have been schooled...I mean in the amount of time it took you to google that pic, you should've been using the time spent with you reading up on the specs...
THAT MODEL (And I quote) 'This model is a special track bike, it is not equipped with front or rear brakes, so it cannot be ridden legally on public thoroughfares' Yeah...so how bout that ignorance? P.S. Here is the site you can find all your facts on : http://www.bscycle.co.jp/en/bridgestonebicycle_thai.pdf read it, process it, read it again just so you're sure...then you can say something. I'm pretty familiar with track racing. Whats your point? Also, some more schooling for you: Feel free to read that there link you posted, and make sure to keep an eye out for the various road bikes they currently produce. Congratulations, pretty sure you've lost this one. |
Originally Posted by Super6Ginsu
(Post 14962464)
no you googled the pic.
|
Wow, thought that the troll might be strong in this one, but it seems he's got nuthin' left. Boring.
|
Originally Posted by WhyFi
(Post 14962482)
Wow, thought that the troll might be strong in this one, but it seems he's got nuthin' left. Boring.
|
Bridgestone is a large, diversified corporation that not only makes tires and bicycles but a variety of other things as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridgestone |
Originally Posted by Spoonrobot
(Post 14962496)
Bridgestone is a large, diversified corporation that not only makes tires and bicycles but a variety of other things as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridgestone |
Originally Posted by Super6Ginsu
(Post 14962528)
AND? The bridgestone bike he posted sucked...it wasn't a nice looking bike. That was the point I was making.
They didn't and they don't. You're pretty bad at trolling. You should probably just stop. |
Originally Posted by Nagrom_
(Post 14962470)
I'm pretty familiar with track racing.
Whats your point? Also, some more schooling for you: Feel free to read that there link you posted, and make sure to keep an eye out for the various road bikes they currently produce. Congratulations, pretty sure you've lost this one. I didn't bring the track bike into the discussion, he did. AND i did read the whole thing about their new MTB and Road bikes. AGAIN, we were talking about the look of the dude's very ugly looking bike. |
Originally Posted by Super6Ginsu
(Post 14962541)
I didn't loose, the basic point of the discussion was the bike the guy posted. Hot or Not. I said NOT because of the look of the bike. The 1991 version of the Bridgestone is a good bike, but the LOOK is what you base HOT or NOT.
I didn't bring the track bike into the discussion, he did. AND i did read the whole thing about their new MTB and Road bikes. AGAIN, we were talking about the look of the dude's very ugly looking bike. |
Originally Posted by Nagrom_
(Post 14962538)
You made the claim that Bridgestone stopped producing bikes in '90's because they sucked at it.
They didn't and they don't. You're pretty bad at trolling. You should probably just stop. Don't be mad that i shook up your rather boring and polite comments on bikes that are HOT or NOT. |
I have ADHD...that makes me bad at convo's, good at arguing, and Mutha****in FAST on a BIKE....
|
Originally Posted by Super6Ginsu
(Post 14962565)
I have ADHD...that makes me bad at convo's, good at arguing, and Mutha****in FAST on a BIKE....
Good at arguing? Missed that part. Mutha****in FAST on a BIKE? Don't know how a learning disability would make you faster on a bicycle, but ok. |
Originally Posted by Nagrom_
(Post 14962547)
uh-oh, sounds like you're losing ground. Also seems that you can't follow a conversation.
|
Originally Posted by Super6Ginsu
(Post 14962553)
Can't stop, Won't stop...ROCKAFELLA records baby!
Don't be mad that i shook up your rather boring and polite comments on bikes that are HOT or NOT. im just going to assume you are about 15 or 16 judging by your grammer Oh and wheres your bike? race results? |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:59 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.