![]() |
Originally Posted by DGlenday
(Post 14769526)
I ride:
- Short-fast rides (e.g. 26 miles @ 21mph), as well as - Very long distances (about 8 centuries at between 17 and 19mph this year, regularly ride 130 miles / 200 km brevets at 17mph, did 150 miles at 17.5 mph last month, and longest single ride this year = 230 miles) ... All on a CAAD - at age 55. So I'd suggest that although a CAAD is best suited to the first kind of ride I listed, it's pretty good at longer distances too. |
Originally Posted by BoomMcNasty
(Post 14773633)
I've been doing some comparing between the caad 10 5 and 3. I have a couple of questions and where else better to ask them than here.
1. Why is it that the only 2013 caad 10 with a carbon seat post is the 3? 2. Weight aside, which crank do you think is better? The 5 has the FSB alloy crank and the 3 has the SLK carbon crank. I weigh about 175lbs and want the bike to be durable 1st and light weight 2nd. Thanks in advance, David |
Originally Posted by Dad 2 3
(Post 14769163)
Does anyone here ride 30-100 miles on their CAAD? I have been eye balling the CAAD 10 5 as my first road bike, but not sure the more "aggressive geometry" would let me do longer rides. I currently ride a hybrid and can comfortably do a 33 mile ride (1400+ feet) in 2 hours, but often ride 50+ mile rides on the weekend and on my days off. Should I buy the synapse instead? I plan on doing test rides on both bikes before I buy, but was wondering what the masses of CAAD cultists on here have to say about longer distances on the CAAD geometry.
Thanks in advance |
Originally Posted by ricohman
(Post 14776634)
The 2012 5 had a "carbon wrapped" post. Which I think is just a post wrapped in carbon to make it look better.
|
I've tried to find info on the individual components of the c10 5 & 3 but with limited sucess. Cannondale's website is useless. Unless you want to see the different paint schemes! The raw scheme is on both models but I prefer the white and black on the 3 the most.
|
Originally Posted by BoomMcNasty
(Post 14778201)
I've tried to find info on the individual components of the c10 5 & 3 but with limited sucess. Cannondale's website is useless. Unless you want to see the different paint schemes! The raw scheme is on both models but I prefer the white and black on the 3 the most.
|
I do, but for example...I don't know what a " CANNONDALE C2, UD CARBON, 27.2X300MM" seat post is exactly. Their website (as far as I know) doesn't specify if its wrapped, full carbon or what.
|
Originally Posted by BoomMcNasty
(Post 14778244)
I do, but for example...I don't know what a " CANNONDALE C2, UD CARBON, 27.2X300MM" seat post is exactly. Their website (as far as I know) doesn't specify if its wrapped, full carbon or what.
|
How does the SuperSix compare to CAAD and the Synapse. I am thinking about getting a Synapse, but haven't tried a SuperSix or CAAD. The LBS I visited has all three, priced about the same. Is SuperSix for aggressive race riding? do I have to be really tied to the Synapse. I am 43 and new to road cycling. But in decent shape at 5'10 and 155 pounds.
|
Originally Posted by FPSDavid
(Post 14778313)
C2 is full carbon. Not sure on the current C3, but it used to be carbon-wrapped alloy. This only applies for seatposts though, I think.
|
Originally Posted by qqy
(Post 14778474)
The C2 on my 2009 CAAD9 is a carbon wrapped post.
My C3 is carbon wrapped |
The CAAD and synapse are aluminum. So the ride isn't suppose to be as smooth as carbon but that's debatable. The CAAD has a " race" geometry but plenty of people in this thread have gone on longer rides and claim to be relatively comfortable. The synapse has a more "relaxed" geometry for endurance/long distance riding. My knowledge of the supersix is limited and I only have negative (personal) opinions of their new low end carbon frames so hopefully someone else can help you there. I test rode a CAAD and will be purchasing one soon for my all of my riding needs. I think It's more versatile than the synapse and since I can only afford one bike (for now), I'm going with the one that fits me the best, does what I want it to do and (most importantly) puts a big dumb smile on my face!
|
Agreed....very confusing! And I have to take the word of my LBS and hope they know what their talking about. I like to go in armed with as much knowledge as possible to see if their legit.
|
Originally Posted by BoomMcNasty
(Post 14778500)
The CAAD and synapse are aluminum. So the ride isn't suppose to be as smooth as carbon but that's debatable. The CAAD has a " race" geometry but plenty of people in this thread have gone on longer rides and claim to be relatively comfortable. The synapse has a more "relaxed" geometry for endurance/long distance riding. My knowledge of the supersix is limited and I only have negative (personal) opinions of their new low end carbon frames so hopefully someone else can help you there. I test rode a CAAD and will be purchasing one soon for my all of my riding needs. I think It's more versatile than the synapse and since I can only afford one bike (for now), I'm going with the one that fits me the best, does what I want it to do and (most importantly) puts a big dumb smile on my face!
|
^ lol, oh yeah!
|
Originally Posted by BoomMcNasty
(Post 14778500)
The CAAD and synapse are aluminum. So the ride isn't suppose to be as smooth as carbon but that's debatable. The CAAD has a " race" geometry but plenty of people in this thread have gone on longer rides and claim to be relatively comfortable. The synapse has a more "relaxed" geometry for endurance/long distance riding. My knowledge of the supersix is limited and I only have negative (personal) opinions of their new low end carbon frames so hopefully someone else can help you there. I test rode a CAAD and will be purchasing one soon for my all of my riding needs. I think It's more versatile than the synapse and since I can only afford one bike (for now), I'm going with the one that fits me the best, does what I want it to do and (most importantly) puts a big dumb smile on my face!
|
Originally Posted by theoddone
(Post 14778407)
How does the SuperSix compare to CAAD and the Synapse. I am thinking about getting a Synapse, but haven't tried a SuperSix or CAAD. The LBS I visited has all three, priced about the same. Is SuperSix for aggressive race riding? do I have to be really tied to the Synapse. I am 43 and new to road cycling. But in decent shape at 5'10 and 155 pounds.
|
Originally Posted by bikerjp
(Post 14778694)
Basically the supersix and the caad are the same bike geometry-wise with one being carbon and the other aluminum. Synapse is a different beast. It's the "performance" road bike or comfort geometry if you prefer. Synapse also comes in carbon or AL depending on model. Both the supersix and caad are considered race bikes but in many ways so is the synapse given that any could be and have been raced. I'm 45 and ride a caad and don't really have any issues. It's not set up as agressive as it could be but still more agressive than my synapse. Basically, you just need to ride them. Difference is subtle and not something you are going to grasp reading about them.
|
Originally Posted by theoddone
(Post 14778922)
Thanks. That's a helpful explanation. I tried the Synapse and liked the way it rides. I am going to go back there and try the Supersix. What should I look for when I ride it in terms of figuring out the differences? I am wondering if it is faster and sharper than Synapse then do I need to overly worry about longer rides. Based on what I read here many people ride CAAD which has similar geometry for longer rides. I will probably ride 20 to 30 miles at one time mostly, and once every other weekend do a 50, and two centuries a year may be.
I wouldn't say the supersix is a "faster" bike than the synapse. 99% of the speed is you and most of us won't ever max out the potential of a good bike. I've set my own PRs on both bikes so my own improvements outweigh the bike differences. The supersix might be the sexier of the two. I've done 50+ mile rides on the caad and have no issues. I did buy the synapse for 50+ mile rides thinking it would be more comfortable and over a long haul it might be. I've only done 65 miles max so far and the bike wasn't an issue. In the 20-30 mile range you'll be fine with either. I ride both and base my decision on which to ride more on the cassette gearing and the intended ride than the length of the ride. Sorry for the long-ish reply. |
Originally Posted by bikerjp
(Post 14778973)
That's not easy to answer. I guess the main thing to think about is which bike do you think is more comfortable, more fun or otherwise just appeals to you better? I bought a caad over the alloy synapse originally because it was "more fun" to ride. By which I mean it was just a bit snappier to ride but it was a rather subtle differences. I think the color of the caad was the final decision maker for me. I just liked it better and in some ways still do over my carbon synapse though I like that bike too.
I wouldn't say the supersix is a "faster" bike than the synapse. 99% of the speed is you and most of us won't ever max out the potential of a good bike. I've set my own PRs on both bikes so my own improvements outweigh the bike differences. The supersix might be the sexier of the two. I've done 50+ mile rides on the caad and have no issues. I did buy the synapse for 50+ mile rides thinking it would be more comfortable and over a long haul it might be. I've only done 65 miles max so far and the bike wasn't an issue. In the 20-30 mile range you'll be fine with either. I ride both and base my decision on which to ride more on the cassette gearing and the intended ride than the length of the ride. Sorry for the long-ish reply. |
And you're also going to post pictures here too, right?
|
Why would he post pics of his synapse in the cult of caad thread??
|
Originally Posted by theoddone
(Post 14782857)
I went and tested Supersix today, compared to the Synapse I wasn't comfortable with the bit more aero position I had to be in it. Ended up riding Synapse one more time just to make sure this is what I wanted, then went inside and put down an advance on the bike. Getting the delivery tomorrow. I can't wait for the weekend to ride the new bike for a 20-30 mile run.
|
Originally Posted by BoomMcNasty
(Post 14783089)
Why would he post pics of his synapse in the cult of caad thread??
Originally Posted by theoddone
(Post 14782857)
I went and tested Supersix today, compared to the Synapse I wasn't comfortable with the bit more aero position I had to be in it. Ended up riding Synapse one more time just to make sure this is what I wanted, then went inside and put down an advance on the bike. Getting the delivery tomorrow. I can't wait for the weekend to ride the new bike for a 20-30 mile run.
But you may be kicked out of the cult (probably nothing you'd miss :)) |
Ooh, so happy, got a smokin' deal on a 2013 63 cm CAAD 10 3 Ultegra. Just picked it up last week, now need to find time to rid it! It actually fits me being 6'4".
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:25 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.