![]() |
Originally Posted by sniks
(Post 6183027)
we were looking at pretty bikes. remember?
jesus whats that gearing? pretty cool just don't like those fenders ...i know its a winter bike Fenders: ummm... do I really need to argue for fenders? In the winter? In Finland? |
I know, lots of issue but with lots of medication and therapy I'm working through them.
|
Finally got around to making it fixed
Catamount dual-suspension; it's been a singlespeed since I first built it up, but when I heard Sheldon Brown had died it finally gave me the kick I needed to fix it.
http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/8123/catamount1yj2.jpg Details: Catamount frame, olde bomber z4 forks, avid sd7 levers/brakes, xtr crank/chainring, surly cog, purple kmc chain, parts box for the rest. Gearing: 32:18, firstly because I am a huge wuss and my commute home has a big hill to get up, and secondly because studded tires/4" of snow on the ground right now makes me want all the extra help I can get. |
Originally Posted by djmitchella
(Post 6183162)
Catamount dual-suspension; it's been a singlespeed since I first built it up, but when I heard Sheldon Brown had died it finally gave me the kick I needed to fix it.
http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/8123/catamount1yj2.jpg Details: Catamount frame, olde bomber z4 forks, avid sd7 levers/brakes, xtr crank/chainring, surly cog, purple kmc chain, parts box for the rest. Gearing: 32:18, firstly because I am a huge wuss and my commute home has a big hill to get up, and secondly because studded tires/4" of snow on the ground right now makes me want all the extra help I can get. EDIT: ambiguous wording. I meant to ask: how is the chain tensioned? |
As I see it the control armis a fixed length, bottom bracket, and rear axle move together. It appears to have a dogbone link that connects to the shock.
|
Originally Posted by maddyfish
(Post 6183236)
As I see it the control armis a fixed length, bottom bracket, and rear axle move together. It appears to have a dogbone link that connects to the shock.
|
Yup -- it's an old style URT design, so the back wheel and bottom bracket are a constant distance apart. 32:18 and a tiny bit of grinding to move the axle back in the dropout, and the chain tension works out just fine. (credit goes to itsdoable on this very forum for the original discovery)
I'm tempted to switch to 34:16 for fixed, because while uphills would be harder, downhills _really suck_ with 32:18.. |
Originally Posted by djmitchella
(Post 6183268)
Yup -- it's an old style URT design, so the back wheel and bottom bracket are a constant distance apart. 32:18 and a tiny bit of grinding to move the axle back in the dropout, and the chain tension works out just fine. (credit goes to itsdoable on this very forum for the original discovery)
I'm tempted to switch to 34:16 for fixed, because while uphills would be harder, downhills _really suck_ with 32:18.. And for another thing: you can forget about switching to 32:16. |
Originally Posted by wroomwroomoops
(Post 6183304)
Magic ratios suck. For one thing, the chain is tensioned for a very short period of the chain's lifespan.
Originally Posted by wroomwroomoops
(Post 6183304)
And for another thing: you can forget about switching to 32:16.
|
Originally Posted by djmitchella
(Post 6183446)
Yup -- but, like I said, for singlespeeding 32:18 was working out fairly well. The flats are a bit spinny, but as rides around here involve a lot of uphill, I'd don't have a problem with the climbs being easy at the expense of the flats.
It's good that the ground dropouts can take up the slack from the elongating chain. If at all possible, could you post a pic of the dropout after the grinding? Did you go in the horizontal direction with that grind? |
|
Originally Posted by wroomwroomoops
(Post 6183010)
My main winter commuter:
http://i120.photobucket.com/albums/o...s/DSCN3135.jpg |
Originally Posted by Straws
(Post 6183860)
how has no one mentioned saddle angle?
|
I dont see how it's any safer. in fact, it's probably putting extra stress on your hands and arms which could easily lead to tennis elbow. but whatever.
|
Originally Posted by Straws
(Post 6183860)
how has no one mentioned saddle angle?
|
Originally Posted by Straws
(Post 6183964)
I dont see how it's any safer. in fact, it's probably putting extra stress on your hands and arms which could easily lead to tennis elbow. but whatever.
http://i120.photobucket.com/albums/o...0000442273.jpg |
I never knew bad saddle angles give you cancer.
|
Originally Posted by Ray_B
(Post 6146560)
Come on, look at the background...the alternative was an inch of steaming cow dung.
Personally, I'd have liked to have seen a picture of the bike somehow mounted on the cow....maybe the front wheel hooked over the neck. |
Bad saddle angles AND skittles both give you cancer.
|
Hey,
Wait a sec. I am no pro, but I am pretty sure poor blood flow doesn't cause cancer. I thought it causes e*ectile dysfunction. Besides cancer cells will undoubted to consume more oxygen (and what-nots) so it may be totally unrelated. But from the picture, I think people who already has prostate problems may be quite uncomfortable with certain saddle positions. I am a noob so I just make sure my pelvic bone is nearly vertical on the saddle. It should be near horizontal with a minor adjustment right? T P.S. Hey I finished my SS bike. It ain't pretty but it's mine. http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b3...i/KC280065.jpg |
my **** gets deleted in less than half an hour but wroom's gets to stay up for 1.5hrs+?
|
Originally Posted by freeskihp
(Post 6184553)
my **** gets deleted in less than half an hour but wroom's gets to stay up for 1.5hrs+?
EDIT: for what it's worth, I wasn't OK with the mods deleting your ****. I am generally against intrusive moderation. |
Originally Posted by wroomwroomoops
(Post 6184566)
That's because you suck and I don't.
EDIT: for what it's worth, I wasn't OK with the mods deleting your ****. I am generally against intrusive moderation. |
Originally Posted by freeskihp
(Post 6184681)
was it the finger?
|
Photos from the 2008 Toronto Ice Race:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2237/...48cdbb.jpg?v=0 http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2012/...50a162.jpg?v=0 http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2242/...8b56f3.jpg?v=0 http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2207/...269c83.jpg?v=0 http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2288/...df682f.jpg?v=0 The full gallery is here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/shapeli...7603929754794/ |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:39 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.