that frame geometry makes me cringe

thanks mang. yeah, the bike shop only had black sugino rings, so i just threw the rocket one on there for now.

w00t!! for big bikes!

i dont see whats with all the big bike nay sayers, big bikes look awesome!

no no. i just get flustered when talking about how doodoo-ish they look. it's truly overwhelming.

why?

Compact EVERYTHING is cool, dude! Frame geometry, double cranksets instead of triples for those who can't survive the hills, etc!

I've seen comments like this about the Langster before and I just don't get it. I am very comfortable on this bike and at the end of the day they all accomplish the same thing.

- it's not a fashion statement to me.

I am simply trying to save gas money and get some exercise. For all of those folks out there wanting to do the same, I highly recommend the Langster.

Non-level top tube, words, positive rise stem.

Cable housing is too short.

i don't think they are big bikes. all the rest of the bikes are just small bikes :P

Good statement. I don't like the langster city series but when you put it that way its hard to argue about if the bike is cool or not. You loke it and it works for you... good enough.

you should consider getting a new fork built for it with less rake than the fork that's on it, something real close to the original fork rake. it will make the ride much more stable.

haha! awesome reply!

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b3...Anal******.jpg[/QUOTE]

that bates is total failure!

I love how people are always more offended by illustrated posts. If I had just posted "-1" you would've probably ignored me.

Fair enough.

And, yea, that's a nice anal ******.

yeah. I've been hunting for one. I never planned on putting that fork on the bike. C&M said that they would correct the original for and when it came back from the paint shop it magicly had a different for on it. They even charged me for it. I couldn't even really do much about it since it was a special paint job and getting another painted fork for it would have taken a few more months to get.

What about the geometry? Is it the 73.5° seat angle? The 74.5° head tube angle? The 39" wheelbase? Is 50mm not enough or too much trail?

my bike....i feel i should be wearing a tuxedo when i ride it though, haha...

http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k9...IMG_0423-1.jpg

Don't use a lens hood next time.

EDIT: The bike isn't even in frame. Geez.

jesus who cares

Ignorant comments like that make me cringe.

Tell me about it. I now remember why left the site for so long. Too many people with ignorant comments.

If you are going to take a picture of your bike, at least try. Use the viewfinder.

Yeah, and I'm usually the one making them.