![]() |
Originally Posted by striknein
(Post 14556143)
Soooo.... wanna hear a funny story? I finally got myself measured for the fit calculator, and it turns out that your Excel frame ended up giving me a dead-on-balls French fit. Apparently I've been riding too-small bikes for a while now. So thanks for THAT.
Originally Posted by Dannihilator
(Post 14556358)
:1: Seat post yes, their stems are starting to use some oddball bolts for a stem.
Originally Posted by Dannihilator
(Post 14556358)
2: While the Gatorskins are good, I feel that the sidewalls on them and the hardshells are not what they used to be.
Originally Posted by Dannihilator
(Post 14556358)
3: I rock 42x15 gearing, I like it, gets the job done.
|
Originally Posted by Mumonkan
(Post 14556055)
ohh, are you guys just getting into them or are they that new? i think i read they were introduced in '09, could be wrong tho
|
I used to live sort of close to the town Dan lives in. Lots of hills/mountains (don't know if that is his reason, but I would be running fewer GIs if I was still out there).
|
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 14556682)
French fit FTW.
The new 3mm allen bolts make sense to prevent hamfisting but suck otherwise. I've yet to find a multitool that even has a 3mm allen wrench. I agree. I've seen far too many of them starting to fray and fall apart after minimal use. I would die. 65ish gi is far too spinny for me. |
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 14556691)
They've been around a while but US distributors are just starting to carry them.
|
I like to spin. Also, the Crank Bros. m17 has a 3mm allen wrench (and it should, the thing weighs like 3 pounds).
|
Originally Posted by striknein
(Post 14556740)
I like to spin. Also, the Crank Bros. m17 has a 3mm allen wrench (and it should, the thing weighs like 3 pounds).
|
Originally Posted by BigglyPuff
(Post 14556940)
But heavy is good...heavy is reliable...
|
Originally Posted by Rootzilla
(Post 14556031)
Also, are the Phil Wood bearings a good replacement? As far as I understand they are not strictly speaking the right type even though the dimensions are the same. Phils are 6901 vs. Surly New Hubs take the angular contact version 7901. 7901 is designed to bear axial loads as well as radial and I read it somewhere that 6901 would wear out faster in the "new hub" style system without the shouldered axle.
|
I've never replaced the bearings in a Surly hub with Phil bearings, nor used a Surly hub.
|
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 14556664)
He's "gone to live on a farm".
|
Mom told me he's living on a farm where he has lots of room to run and play!
|
Originally Posted by BigglyPuff
(Post 14556940)
But heavy is good...heavy is reliable...
http://media.screened.com/uploads/1/..._the_blade.jpg |
Originally Posted by striknein
(Post 14556740)
the Crank Bros. m17 has a 3mm allen wrench (and it should, the thing weighs like 3 pounds).
|
Bingo. One of my favorites. Yeah, I didn't mean it literally, it's just a joke from Snatch. Boris the Bullet Dodger, pictured below, says it when he's trying to sell a bonky, heavy gun to someone.
Originally Posted by Mumonkan
(Post 14557797)
if it does not work...you can always hit him with it
http://media.screened.com/uploads/1/..._the_blade.jpg |
Oh wise Zilla excuse another noob question. If I really have my mind set on these IRD Defiant track crankset - IRD Defiant crankset - 170mm, and I know that they use a Square taper JIS bottom bracket. So if I want to run them do I need anything else besides Shimano UN55 bottom bracket - Shimano UN55 bottom bracket - 113mm? Or could you help set me up here. I've searched for hours and since nobody buys this stupid frame its difficult to find infomartion.
Again thanks for your support. |
Originally Posted by Crandrew
(Post 14560024)
Oh wise Zilla excuse another noob question. If I really have my mind set on these IRD Defiant track crankset - IRD Defiant crankset - 170mm, and I know that they use a Square taper JIS bottom bracket. So if I want to run them do I need anything else besides Shimano UN55 bottom bracket - Shimano UN55 bottom bracket - 113mm? Or could you help set me up here. I've searched for hours and since nobody buys this stupid frame its difficult to find infomartion.
Again thanks for your support. I think this will work: http://www.retro-gression.com/produc...bottom-bracket Scrod can correct me if I'm wrong |
|
well they both are • 68mm English threaded (1.370" x 24tpi)/JIS square-taper - with 110mm so now you got me confused
|
68mm English threaded refers to what type of BB shell it will fit inside of. 110mm refers to the spindle length.
If you look at the drop-down menu for the UN55, you will see that we carry it in 3 different lengths. |
Cat-Bread.gif -- mesmerizing
|
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 14557830)
Eff that. I've never been in a situation that called for an emergency adjusting of my handlebar angle while out on the road. Carrying a 3 lb multi-tool isn't something I'll ever do - Thomson stem with wonky bolts or not.
http://500motivators.com/plog-conten...since-1939.jpg |
|
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 14523305)
Pasela TGs are awesome on hard-packed gravel and such and they have great rolling resistance if you keep them inflated a little over the recommended PSI. I love them. The TGs do run a little small, though.
So for anyone who's interested, here's an update on the question I had a couple of pages back about switching from Durano Plus to Pasela TG's to give me a little more flexibility in the type of terrain I can do. Scrod spoke very highly of the TG's. I ended up getting the Pasela TG's and just got back from the first ride. I went from a size 25 in the Durano's to a 28 in the TG's, though the TG's measure out to 27 on my rim. So, just a touch wider than the Schwalbes, which were true to size. I freaking love the TG's. This was a city ride, with lots of potholes and such, and the Pasela's definitely felt smoother and a bit more 'plush' than the Durano Plus's. I could corner better, and spent a lot less time trying to avoid some of the road imperfections that would have been bone-jarring with the Duranos. The TG's have a little more bounce than the uber-stiff Durano's, and this translates into a pretty fun responsiveness, especially when I'm mashing it to get up to speed from a stoplight. the tread makes them a little bit noisier than the Durano's, but not enough to bother me. The most surprising thing was speed. Subjectively, the TG's felt a little slower, but I think this was because of the comfort...sort of like driving a luxury car with softer suspension and not realizing how fast you're going. But ultimately, on this first day, I seemed to be faster than on the Durano's. I did the same round-trip commute I do a few times a week, over the same route. Only difference was today was windier than normal, and it was headwind and side gusts, not tailwinds. According to Endomondo, both ways I was about 1mph faster than normal on average. Time will tell whether this is a new normal, or if I just had a really good day... So, definitely worth the change for me... |
Thanks for coming back with that. Pasela TGs are one of my favorite tires and that pretty much sums them up perfectly.
What psi were you running? |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:28 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.