![]() |
Originally Posted by Huffandstuff
(Post 16275702)
I tried the online thing and well it's nothing but ratchets and fatters. It's pretty rough.
|
Originally Posted by AristoNYC
(Post 16275631)
hmm, I've never heard of that. Let me know how it works out.
you yes/no people based on pictures and only if both of you are basically dtf then you can chat, lmao |
I went to Texas this past weekend for audition camp, and while I was gone, my roommate took my saddle and seatpost out of my bike and put it in the fridge. I freaked out at first, but looking back it was pretty funny.
|
Originally Posted by Mumonkan
(Post 16276072)
its like grindr but not just for gays, and its probably the most shallow form of "dating" in existence
you yes/no people based on pictures and only if both of you are basically dtf then you can chat, lmao My buddy is a big Tinder user and he says it's "like fishing with dynamite." /shrug I say go for it, dude. |
Originally Posted by Jandro
(Post 16277051)
It's not shallow... society has just brainwashed people to think that that casual dating/sex is a bad thing and somehow 'dirty'. **** that noise.
My buddy is a big Tinder user and he says it's "like fishing with dynamite." /shrug I say go for it, dude. |
Originally Posted by solipsist716
(Post 16277061)
Call me brainwashed but I'm grossed out by the whole idea.
|
Originally Posted by johnnytheboy
(Post 16274105)
krylon.
|
Originally Posted by solipsist716
(Post 16277061)
Call me brainwashed but I'm grossed out by the whole idea.
I'm all for meeting someone and clicking with them and having sex without it meaning a whole lot. The problem with this thing as it has been described is that you are looking at people as a means to an end, essentially dehumanizing them. If you meet someone with the intent of getting to know them and then happen to have sex, you are at least looking at them as a person rather than just a body. |
Originally Posted by Huffandstuff
(Post 16275702)
I tried the online thing and well it's nothing but ratchets and fatters. It's pretty rough.
|
Originally Posted by prooftheory
(Post 16277129)
+1
I'm all for meeting someone and clicking with them and having sex without it meaning a whole lot. The problem with this thing as it has been described is that you are looking at people as a means to an end, essentially dehumanizing them. If you meet someone with the intent of getting to know them and then happen to have sex, you are at least looking at them as a person rather than just a body. I dunno, I'm indifferent to the whole thing. I know people that have no desire to be in a relationship, yet sex is sex. Why not use something where other people are looking for the same thing - it sure beats being the creep at the bar. |
Today I had a surprise day off and have spent too much of it looking for a new everyday carry assisted-open knife.
How hard is it to get one without looking like a dickheaded version of some early 2000's action movie or a doomsday prepper? Get outta here with that "tactical" BS, all I want is a classic pocketknife with a thumb stud. |
Originally Posted by solipsist716
(Post 16277383)
Today I had a surprise day off and have spent too much of it looking for a new everyday carry assisted-open knife.
How hard is it to get one without looking like a dickheaded version of some early 2000's action movie or a doomsday prepper? Get outta here with that "tactical" BS, all I want is a classic pocketknife with a thumb stud. Most AO knives are all tacticool. |
Originally Posted by solipsist716
(Post 16277383)
Today I had a surprise day off and have spent too much of it looking for a new everyday carry assisted-open knife.
How hard is it to get one without looking like a dickheaded version of some early 2000's action movie or a doomsday prepper? Get outta here with that "tactical" BS, all I want is a classic pocketknife with a thumb stud.
Originally Posted by prooftheory
I'm all for meeting someone and clicking with them and having sex without it meaning a whole lot. The problem with this thing as it has been described is that you are looking at people as a means to an end, essentially dehumanizing them. If you meet someone with the intent of getting to know them and then happen to have sex, you are at least looking at them as a person rather than just a body.
I understand that my beliefs are what most would call 'liberal', though, and that sort of thing doesn't work for everyone; and that is totally ok and awesome. I just think people should be told that alternatives are around and no less valid. |
every other creature on this earth can have meaningless sex, why cant i?
mind you thats not my goal in life, but im not opposed to it at all. im just lookin for something casual without a label on it |
Originally Posted by Mumonkan
(Post 16277549)
every other creature on this earth can have meaningless sex, why cant i?
|
Originally Posted by Jandro
(Post 16277440)
See that's the issues I'm talking about. Having sex with someone that you don't intend to have a serious relationship (as long as that's a mutual understanding) is as far from dehumanizing as I believe you can get. Sex and intimacy are part of the human condition and the idea that you can only explore that with someone you intend to be in a committed relationship with is, in my opinion, archaic and stifling. If anything, I view it as incredibly liberating and very humanizing.
|
Originally Posted by prooftheory
(Post 16277615)
Would you view visiting a prostitute as humanizing?
You have to realize that the the person on the other end is doing the exact same thing. |
women are not objects dudes.
|
Originally Posted by solipsist716
(Post 16277383)
Today I had a surprise day off and have spent too much of it looking for a new everyday carry assisted-open knife.
How hard is it to get one without looking like a dickheaded version of some early 2000's action movie or a doomsday prepper? Get outta here with that "tactical" BS, all I want is a classic pocketknife with a thumb stud. For assisted knifes I would probably lean towards either SOG or Kershaw. Kershaw has more "budget" options depending on your limit. How much are you looking to spend, do you want serrations, what size blade, what blade shape, what color blade/handle? http://www.tactical-life.com/wp-cont...t-hissatsu.gif |
Originally Posted by Mumonkan
(Post 16277639)
women are not objects dudes.
http://clothesonfilm.com/wp-content/...-mid.bmp-1.jpg |
Today at lunch I decided that yellowtail nigiri is one of the best things
|
Originally Posted by solipsist716
(Post 16277383)
Today I had a surprise day off and have spent too much of it looking for a new everyday carry assisted-open knife.
How hard is it to get one without looking like a dickheaded version of some early 2000's action movie or a doomsday prepper? Get outta here with that "tactical" BS, all I want is a classic pocketknife with a thumb stud. http://www.amazon.com/Kershaw-Onion-.../dp/B0009VC9RW |
Originally Posted by Nagrom_
(Post 16277628)
That's a terrible comparison.
You have to realize that the the person on the other end is doing the exact same thing. |
Originally Posted by AristoNYC
(Post 16277657)
Hmm, I collect knives but I actually prefer all the tactical look (see the CRKT knife I have below).
For assisted knifes I would probably lean towards either SOG or Kershaw. Kershaw has more "budget" options depending on your limit. How much are you looking to spend, do you want serrations, what size blade, what blade shape, what color blade/handle? |
Originally Posted by prooftheory
(Post 16278001)
How does that make it different? With a prostitute the John has something he wants and the prostitute has something she wants, neither of them want to look at the encounter as being about people but as a trade. The same thing could br said when both parties are simply looking for sex. I'm not saying that this is necessarily what happens on tinder but that seems to be the way it is described.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:41 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.