![]() |
Originally Posted by raisinberry777
(Post 20032680)
What I don't get is the amount of posters that go 'just got a new bike, still dialing in my fit lol' along with a poorly lit photo from a strange angle. Taking a decent photo of a bike is not rocket science, nor does a bike require a totally slammed setup to be hot (although it never hurts). This is the Hot r Not thread, not a please give me sympathy for my poor setup and terrible photo thread.
I had just ridden a 2nd best 50km, excuse me if my camera skills with an iPhone doesn't meet your expectations of bike porn. |
Originally Posted by pvillemasher
(Post 20032585)
I take it you hadn't read the first 1,022 pages of this thread before you posted. It's sorta what happens, why it's fun to visit here.
I have a nice comfy laid back Ti bike also, wouldn't think of posting in here because it ain't hot by the Hot r Not standards. No use fighting it. |
Originally Posted by nycphotography
(Post 20032135)
Huh what? You ask people to rate your aesthetic appeal, you find out you have no aesthetic appeal, so obviously aesthetic appeal must be a racist thing?
Srsly? https://tjthesportsgeek.files.wordpr...5/12/srsly.jpg |
Originally Posted by Capo72
(Post 20032540)
Exactly!
That's what I mean by starting fresh. I've been through every page in this thread and know the rules (which is why my bike is not shown here!) I don't think that very many people who have posted, in about the last 6 months, have read the 1st page. The not hot and butt hurt posters far out weigh the actual (IMO) hot bikes posted over the last 6 months. mmmmK? |
Originally Posted by Wspsux
(Post 20032050)
I think if you lower your saddle slightly and nudge it forward a bit you'll be able to level it just fine and your fit will improve.
|
Originally Posted by noodle soup
(Post 20032104)
As to the handlebars...
The levers are a little low on the bars, and the bars are rotated up to compensate for this. Changing this will bring the drops back into a more useful position. |
Originally Posted by RPK79
(Post 20032386)
Not.
|
Originally Posted by MauiKai
(Post 20033111)
I had just ridden a 2nd best 50km, excuse me if my camera skills with an iPhone doesn't meet your expectations of bike porn.
|
Originally Posted by WhyFi
(Post 20033201)
But the point of the thread *is* bike porn, regardless of your daunting 31 mile ride.
But it was fast. And today will even be faster. And when I do my longer rides, they will be faster and more comfortable. |
Originally Posted by MauiKai
(Post 20033207)
I know. I read the title.
But it was fast. And today will even be faster. |
Originally Posted by WhyFi
(Post 20033209)
Ride a bike that ugly, you better be fast.
|
Let's all move on. Okay?
|
Here's my Colnago CX-1. Unfortunately just a cellphone photo, but hey, maybe it distracts from the previous heated debate.
[IMG]https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4555/...edbecd96_k.jpg20171119_120049 by Eddie Brown, on Flickr[/IMG] |
Originally Posted by ebow3d
(Post 20033701)
Here's my Colnago CX-1. Unfortunately just a cellphone photo, but hey, maybe it distracts from the previous heated debate.
[IMG]https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4555/...edbecd96_k.jpg20171119_120049 by Eddie Brown, on Flickr[/IMG] Nothing to apologize for with your cellphone photo - it shows the bike off very well. I appreciate how we try to maintain a standard of presentation here, and it is a pleasure to see the really skillfully taken shots, but I think we'd miss out on a lot of really cool (hot) bikes if all the pictures had to be ready to print in a catalog or post on a billboard. |
Originally Posted by ebow3d
(Post 20033701)
Here's my Colnago CX-1. Unfortunately just a cellphone photo, but hey, maybe it distracts from the previous heated debate.
I bet it is a dream to ride though. |
Seat angle again! BAH!
|
Originally Posted by ebow3d
(Post 20033701)
Here's my Colnago CX-1. Unfortunately just a cellphone photo, but hey, maybe it distracts from the previous heated debate.
[IMG]https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4555/...edbecd96_k.jpg20171119_120049 by Eddie Brown, on Flickr[/IMG] |
Originally Posted by ebow3d
(Post 20033701)
Here's my Colnago CX-1. Unfortunately just a cellphone photo, but hey, maybe it distracts from the previous heated debate.
[IMG]https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4555/...edbecd96_k.jpg20171119_120049 by Eddie Brown, on Flickr[/IMG] |
Originally Posted by Capo72
(Post 20033981)
Com'on man, your inner tubes don't match!
|
Originally Posted by ebow3d
(Post 20033701)
Here's my Colnago CX-1. Unfortunately just a cellphone photo, but hey, maybe it distracts from the previous heated debate.
[IMG]https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4555/...edbecd96_k.jpg20171119_120049 by Eddie Brown, on Flickr[/IMG] |
Originally Posted by kbarch
(Post 20033755)
Mixed feelings. Many things about it are nice, but the more I look and think about it, the less I like it. I rather like the wheels, but it's ironic that the only marking or spot of graphic design pertains to the brakes.
Are you talking about the decal on the rear wheel? I like the bike, but I'd level the saddle and ditch the red tape. |
I posted this when I built it... here's a more recent shot in the wild.
https://scontent-lga3-1.cdninstagram...30808576_n.jpg |
and another. (grimy bar tape is a badge of honor. don't get that unless you actually put miles on the thing.)
https://scontent-lga3-1.cdninstagram...51113472_n.jpg |
Originally Posted by nycphotography
(Post 20034294)
I posted this when I built it... here's a more recent shot in the wild.
|
Pointing out that a bike can still be hot w/o being primped and preened first?
None of the rule breaking is about the bike itself, just in the staging for the pictures. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:56 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.