![]() |
Originally Posted by echotraveler
(Post 13709027)
this thread needs me! the rules are stated on the 1rst page, this isn't a "this is my bike".....to all of YOU "HATE the GAME, not the PLAYER"
I dont have a photo to present here. I know what hot is, clearly many of you dont! |
Originally Posted by JustinHorne
(Post 13703850)
I'm sorry, and I hope I'm not the only one, but... Functionally I love it, aesthetically I think it looks terrible. Doesn't Specialized make a similar looking thing? Hate that one too. It's so big and boxy.
My point was that CF bikes themselves are kind of bulbous and bulky. Cylindrical stems are more fitting of the design aesthetic of 1990's AL bikes with their big tubes etc. The Look stem, with its white/naked CF look and squared, flattened proportions and shape-- well, that suits a modern CF frame. We tend to like what we are used to seeing-- normal stems. But this one is an aesthetic sucess because of how it integrates with the design of the frame. I can certainly imagine it being butt ugly on the wrong frame. |
Originally Posted by pelotonracer
(Post 13709142)
1-Saddle 8 2-Seatpost 8 3-Frame 7 4-Stem 9 5-Handlebar 9 6-Group 8 7-Wheels 9 8-Tires 9 9-Spacers 10 10-Saddle to bar drop 10 11-Color coordination 8 12-Color scheme 8 13-Cleanliness 10 14-Chain on big ring 10 15-Chain on small cog 10 16-Crank position 10 17-Attachments 8 18-Photography 8 Final score 8.83= Hot |
A simple "hot" would have been sufficient.
I think that S2 is hot, but I'd go black hoods and cages. |
Raleigh NOT! Garage door, photo is too dark, red tape saddle seatpost red cable bottlecages tyre combo kill the bike.
|
Originally Posted by UCIMBZ
(Post 13710278)
Please score my bike on the scale of 0-10, 10 being the hottest, on each category listed below. Please add all the scores and divide by the number of categories listed to reach your final score. A final score of 8.5 or higher is required to qualify as "Hot".
1-Saddle 8 2-Seatpost 8 3-Frame 7 4-Stem 9 5-Handlebar 9 6-Group 8 7-Wheels 9 8-Tires 9 9-Spacers 10 10-Saddle to bar drop 10 11-Color coordination 8 12-Color scheme 8 13-Cleanliness 10 14-Chain on big ring 10 15-Chain on small cog 10 16-Crank position 10 17-Attachments 8 18-Photography 8 Final score 8.83= Hot Not hot!!! look at the ridiculous position of the rear skewer, the red lettering on the front tire is a different red than the frame, the wheels are a model year older than the frame, it needs a nice garage door, the crank arm is .0003 degrees to low, the shadowing on the floor is horrible, and the cabling on the handle bars is .004mm to high Wrong Said Bob |
Originally Posted by JSS
(Post 13710369)
Here is my echotraveler style review:
Not hot!!! look at the ridiculous position of the rear skewer, the red lettering on the front tire is a different red than the frame, the wheels are a model year older than the frame, it needs a nice garage door, the crank arm is .0003 degrees to low, the shadowing on the floor is horrible, and the cabling on the handle bars is .004mm to high |
Originally Posted by pelotonracer
(Post 13709142)
|
Originally Posted by sbxx1985
(Post 13710333)
A simple "hot" would have been sufficient.
I think that S2 is hot, but I'd go black hoods and cages. |
Originally Posted by X-LinkedRider
(Post 13709468)
The rules also state "Hot or Not" not your entire visual character analysis. Clearly you only read what you wanted to. Also, you are saying no bike can be hot unless it has a garage door behind it? Lol? You definitely understand what HOT means when it comes to bikes. Bahaha. Go ride your frame.... The game is simple and allow for Opinion. The player is an f'n tool and doesn't understand the game. I'l hate on what I want.
Originally Posted by X-LinkedRider
(Post 13709444)
That's right. You don't even have to have a bike that works apparently. As long as it sits in front of the garage door properly. Too bad Lance, George Hinacpie's and Levi Leipheimer's bikes would be total fails in this thread. Their garage doors are Beige and yellow.
Originally Posted by X-LinkedRider
(Post 13709421)
He doesn't even have a bike. He has a frame and a nice plan. I'll spend my time pedaling. He'll spends his saying how awesome the bike he has never ridden is going to be. I'm curious to see what his backup bike looks like. Unless she doesn't have one. He's talking about White garage doors and doesn't even have wheels on his bike. This thread makes me shake my head.
We all know at this point, Cervelo's Speciazlized and Cannondales are the only accepted bikes in here. These peoples lives must be fantastic to witness at home. "You're brand new Lexus isn't as cool as mine that doesn't run because I have bigger wheels a a garage to put it in. Don't you know every vehicle SUX unless it has 22's and a Garage." All I know is, while I'm on my 3k mile for the year, he'll still be worried about color matching seatposts.
Originally Posted by X-LinkedRider
(Post 13709338)
Non adjustable. I removed the Adjustable stem as they squeak after a long while under load (touring load) and I really have no reason to change my stem/handlebar height. The couple of spacers on there leave me with enough room to drop if I wanted to. I do thank you for the compliments. I know some people only like bikes you would never ride (It's a picture forum) but I ride ALL my bikes, considering this thing started as a 500 dollar flat bar road bike, it has come a long way. 2 people stopped me during yesterdays ride asking where I got the bike and how far I have ever ridden on it. Then a roadie at a red light stopped next to me and was asking about the gearing setup and the full range for climbing. No complaints out of me yet.
Wow, are you really that bothered that people don't like your bike? |
This is an odd thread. I'm a recent visitor to the road cycling forum (otherwise, near as I can tell, I'd be required to call it "the 41"), and my first impression of this thread was that it was a fun, bawdy place where people were intentionally superficial and both hyperbole and tongue-in-cheek comedy were encouraged. Then a bunch of people started getting offended.
Personally, if I wanted everyone to "play nice" I'd post my bike in the "What road bike are you riding?" thread and maybe ask for feedback if I wanted suggestions on the asthetics. Posting it here, I'd completely expect people to complain about poor lighting, noisy backdrop, god-awful stem angle, MTB pedals :eek:, bad crank angles, etc. As it happens, I just bought my first true road bike and I haven't finished putting it together yet (though it does have wheels :D), so you'll have to be satisfied with one of my cyclocross bikes set up for road riding. http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6032/5...1560c55e_z.jpg Have at.... |
Flip it.
|
NOT - triple is always a not
|
|
I have posted this before but some people asked for a better pic. So here you go:
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7164/6...5087d634_z.jpg It is much older than a lot of you out there. And I am the original owner. |
The tires need celeste sidewalls. Once that's done, HOT! Now, it's kinda pretty.
|
Bianchi is hot.
|
Originally Posted by Yaniel
(Post 13710889)
Wow, are you really that bothered that people don't like your bike?
I am starting a new thread called... "Wheels and Photography Skills oh yeah.. only the cheapest of white garage doors counts" which is pretty much what this has become. Comments like "Triples are ALWAYS a not" just goes to show you how laughable some people are when it comes to thinking outside the box.. or at all really. Peloton.. S2 is HOT despite my above comments.. (Way to follow the Sheppard's advice) Andy_K .. Never seen a Surly setup so Road like. (I'm always a loyal Surly touring bike fan) Hot? |
Originally Posted by pelotonracer
(Post 13711160)
The tires need celeste sidewalls. Once that's done, HOT! Now, it's kinda pretty.
|
Originally Posted by UCIMBZ
(Post 13711149)
I have posted this before but some people asked for a better pic. So here you go:
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7164/6...5087d634_z.jpg It is much older than a lot of you out there. And I am the original owner. "wrong" said Bob |
Originally Posted by UCIMBZ
(Post 13711149)
I have posted this before but some people asked for a better pic. So here you go:
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7164/6...5087d634_z.jpg It is much older than a lot of you out there. And I am the original owner. |
I thought about getting the black/white elite custom cages and keeping the black hoods, but then my S2 would truly be a generic S2 with deep carbon wheels.
That being said, I tried to customize it by playing off the red accenting on the frame as much as possible. Although not visible in the picture, the tubular tires also have a centre red stripe. I'm also thinking about getting these red CNC Planet X brakes http://www.planet-x-bikes.co.uk/imgs...CNC-RED_P1.jpg to replace the stock FSA Gossamer brakes and save 100+ grams in the process. |
Originally Posted by UCIMBZ
(Post 13711149)
I have posted this before but some people asked for a better pic. So here you go:
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7164/6...5087d634_z.jpg It is much older than a lot of you out there. And I am the original owner. |
Originally Posted by Andy_K
(Post 13711032)
I though this was hot until I saw pelotonracer's S2. Do that.
This is just my base (before pic) which for me is a "not" still |
Originally Posted by Perp
(Post 13711296)
Wheels are a bit too deep for me. I do have some 45mm carbon wheels, but saving that pic when all my parts are installed.
This is just my base (before pic) which for me is a "not" still |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:00 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.