![]() |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by 69chevy
(Post 19446007)
eeeeew
|
Originally Posted by cycledogg
(Post 19446174)
Huummmm, maybe it's the angle of the photo?
|
Originally Posted by goenrdoug
(Post 19446275)
No, it's probably more to do with the crank and the cables coming out the side of the shifters. The rest of it's great.
|
Originally Posted by SvenMN
(Post 19440982)
A bit more conventional than some of the recent posts. Zero miles on it since build, winter continues here. Still playing with saddle/bar position.
http://i235.photobucket.com/albums/e...N/IMG_1290.jpg (I have a CAAD10 in the same team colors livery) |
Originally Posted by SvenMN
(Post 19440982)
A bit more conventional than some of the recent posts. Zero miles on it since build, winter continues here. Still playing with saddle/bar position.
http://i235.photobucket.com/albums/e...N/IMG_1290.jpg Fit gets me. Bars are tilted up an rise stem, relatively short. It looks like too small/under tall a bike, or needs spacers/higher bar. Saddle is far forward. Might just be the post. That post goes back. I might expect that on longer stem and dropped bars. Looks like bike is too big. Something is wrong on your fit/you need a shorter TT. |
Originally Posted by Doge
(Post 19447517)
RD is adjusted correctly? Does not look like it.
Fit gets me. Bars are tilted up an rise stem, relatively short. It looks like too small/under tall a bike, or needs spacers/higher bar. Saddle is far forward. Might just be the post. That post goes back. I might expect that on longer stem and dropped bars. Looks like bike is too big. Something is wrong on your fit/you need a shorter TT. |
Originally Posted by TenSpeedV2
(Post 19445748)
Justify it all you want, it is ugly like that. And it is very flat here, so no need for a "climbing" setup for me.
|
|
Originally Posted by Fiery
(Post 19447613)
How would you set up that bar with those shifters? Honest question.
|
|
Originally Posted by Jimbo1983
(Post 19447624)
Flip the stem and rotate the **** out of those bars until they look more horizontal.
We are talking about cycledogg's bike, right? Oh, and how hard is it to shrink a picture before posting? |
Originally Posted by Jimbo1983
(Post 19447624)
Flip the stem and rotate the **** out of those bars until they look more horizontal.
they are classic drop shaped, not compact or ergo. this is the best setup thats possible. thats also not a stem to flip |
Thanks all for your comments on my Super 6. I've made a few tweaks to maybe bring the temp up a few degrees... :rolleyes:
http://i235.photobucket.com/albums/e...N/IMG_1293.jpg Some astute observations on the fit... Had a pro fit a few years back, to paraphrase CB: "you're a freak!" (short torso, extremely long femurs). To properly fit I need something like a 59cm seat tube with a 55cm (or shorter) top tube. Not ready for custom frame (yet) so compromise, compromise... And being an old fart with a preference for horizontal top tubes narrows my options to almost nil. Been keeping a spreadsheet with published frame dimensions. My first attempt was a fail with way too much seat post exposed but a decent cockpit (large LOOK 586). This XL Super 6 is my second attempt with cockpit adjustments (Zipp 70mm stem and short/shallow bars). [MENTION=364302]Doge[/MENTION] RD readjusted with two links removed from chain, thanks for pointing it out. This will be my first foray into training with power... I'm hoping the dZero metrics will help me fine tune my position... may be able to ride my threshold segment in a few days. FYI for anyone that cares weight with Metron 40/25mm GP4000s, eTap with Quarq Red, and pedals/cages/520 is 14.8 pounds on my bathroom scale. |
Originally Posted by SvenMN
(Post 19448640)
.
[MENTION=364302]Doge[/MENTION] RD readjusted with two links removed from chain, thanks for pointing it out. ... Turn it to the right and the body of the RD should become more parallel to the ground. Taking mechanic advice over the Internet from BF is a risk. It just looked like that screw needed turning. |
Originally Posted by Fiery
(Post 19447719)
Flip the stem up? Why? And the bar is at almost the same angle as the one on the bike you posted.
We are talking about cycledogg's bike, right? Oh, and how hard is it to shrink a picture before posting? I think the picture is shrunk? Unless my browser automatically fits it to my screen, sorry if that's the case I'll change it. |
Originally Posted by SvenMN
(Post 19448640)
...Had a pro fit a few years back, to paraphrase CB: "you're a freak!" (short torso, extremely long femurs). To properly fit I need something like a 59cm seat tube with a 55cm (or shorter) top tube. Not ready for custom frame (yet) so compromise, compromise...
... |
Originally Posted by Doge
(Post 19448921)
That is more a women's frame geometry. You might want to look at that. They are typically shorter TT to seat tube ratio. Nothing about them says "woman" if you remove the pink tape :-)
I need to ride this frame, and would have no qualms about flipping over the stem and even cutting the steerer down some more. |
1 Attachment(s)
Your frame may work just fine for you. But it is a race geometry and as such something that fits you well may not win the beauty contest. We (I own, son rode) had one before it got stolen.
This is NOT a hot-or-not entry, but you can see my kid (I know you are not a teen) has the opposite issue. Now even worse, the EVO TT is too short. Attachment 556335 |
Updated photos of my Allez Sprint.
- replaced Red mechanical with Etap - switched from 120mm to 130mm stem and lowered slightly - replaced the Boyd clinchers with Roval CLX50 tubulars - replaced Garmin Vectors with Time Xpresso 15 pedals - added Stages power meter - replaced the solid white bartape with Supercaz black to white I think the loss of shifting cables really cleans up the lines. https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-1...p/IMG_1006.JPG Top view of bartape https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-R...p/IMG_1007.JPG |
Originally Posted by Da Reef
(Post 19451304)
Updated photos of my Allez Sprint.
- replaced Red mechanical with Etap - switched from 120mm to 130mm stem and lowered slightly - replaced the Boyd clinchers with Roval CLX50 tubulars - replaced Garmin Vectors with Time Xpresso 15 pedals - added Stages power meter - replaced the solid white bartape with Supercaz black to white I think the loss of shifting cables really cleans up the lines. Weight went from 15.9lbs (with the Vectors) to 15lbs even as listed above and shown below. https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/Ux...xed79JW6vs9U3C Top view of bartape https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/hh...uz8YIm-OSKZtAf |
Originally Posted by Doge
(Post 19448921)
That is more a women's frame geometry. You might want to look at that. They are typically shorter TT to seat tube ratio. Nothing about them says "woman" if you remove the pink tape :-)
|
Originally Posted by Da Reef
(Post 19451304)
Updated photos of my Allez Sprint.
- replaced Red mechanical with Etap - switched from 120mm to 130mm stem and lowered slightly - replaced the Boyd clinchers with Roval CLX50 tubulars - replaced Garmin Vectors with Time Xpresso 15 pedals - added Stages power meter - replaced the solid white bartape with Supercaz black to white I think the loss of shifting cables really cleans up the lines. Weight went from 15.9lbs (with the Vectors) to 15lbs even as listed above and shown below. https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/Ux...xed79JW6vs9U3C Top view of bartape https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/hh...uz8YIm-OSKZtAf |
Originally Posted by Da Reef
(Post 19451304)
Updated photos of my Allez Sprint.
- replaced Red mechanical with Etap - switched from 120mm to 130mm stem and lowered slightly - replaced the Boyd clinchers with Roval CLX50 tubulars - replaced Garmin Vectors with Time Xpresso 15 pedals - added Stages power meter - replaced the solid white bartape with Supercaz black to white I think the loss of shifting cables really cleans up the lines. Weight went from 15.9lbs (with the Vectors) to 15lbs even as listed above and shown below. https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/Ux...xed79JW6vs9U3C Top view of bartape https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/hh...uz8YIm-OSKZtAf |
Originally Posted by raisinberry777
(Post 19451341)
Valid point as that may be, I don't think many (any?) women's geometry frames would be made in a large enough size.
|
Originally Posted by Jimbo1983
(Post 19448777)
No I was talking about the green and white Cannondale.
I think the picture is shrunk? Unless my browser automatically fits it to my screen, sorry if that's the case I'll change it. It's shrunk, but the actual image is still huge - 3858 x 2568 px. It still puts a load on bandwidth and the browser even if it looks smaller, thanks for changing it. Too bad the original was already quoted in the very next post, but what can you do. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:48 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.