![]() |
Originally Posted by TenSpeedV2
(Post 19488516)
The gumwalls look like an afterthought and it really takes away from the bike overall.
Originally Posted by kbarch
(Post 19488532)
That helps, but mostly I like the way it shows off the taper of the head tube and the general shapeliness of the frame.
Originally Posted by ravenmore
(Post 19488574)
Good looking build. Personally I don't like the saddle angle, gumwall tires, and not sure how I feel about the white saddle/bar tape/cable housing.
Originally Posted by redfooj
(Post 19488920)
I think this is one of the best examples of skinwalls because they pair on rims with some fair depth and they set a pop from the stealth look.
Being that red and black is a pretty sinister combo that would have made for a great accent instead of white. That would be 9.7
Originally Posted by noodle soup
(Post 19488954)
Not a fan of the white housings, cages, or hubs.
Those handlebars look tiny Disc brakes look hideous on road bikes |
Originally Posted by joejack951
(Post 19489033)
Boo! The handlebars are pretty short and shallow. The upside is I get to run a 110mm stem (vs. 100mm, you know, for a better score in this thread) and I have plenty of saddle to bar drop at the hoods (for a better score, and it's quite comfortable for me) while still having usable drops. They are very similar to the Ritchey Classics I have on my Trek and those work very well for me. Less compact drops would likely have required I go to the next size up frame to make them usable (which is how I used to build my bikes) but I like the aesthetics of the smaller frame that the compact bars allow, among the other functional traits. The discs are function over form, but I'm not offended by them either.
I like the bike, but there are some things I would have done differently. The stem length/handler/frame size choice is one, but I understand your reasoning. Disc brakes look strange to me on road bikes, but probably because I have no need for them. It rarely rains here. They look fine on the Disc Trucker I'm borrowing from a friend. I sorta like the tire choice, but prefer the darker color that Continental uses on their GP Classics. |
Looks great, nice work. I think I'd prefer black housing too, but who knows... and those campag levers are hideous, but that's not your fault ;)
Originally Posted by joejack951
(Post 19486471)
https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2915/3...6f6668d7_b.jpg
For more info, see: http://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycli...ike-build.html |
Originally Posted by GuitarBob
(Post 19489684)
those campag levers are hideous, but that's not your fault ;)
|
Originally Posted by noodle soup
(Post 19489576)
I sorta like the tire choice, but prefer the darker color that Continental uses on their GP Classics. http://i402.photobucket.com/albums/p...pssve2anjy.jpg |
Originally Posted by lsberrios1
(Post 19487456)
Cut the steerer tube and now it's completely slammed. I wish I had a more agressive stem but FSA does not make an 8* or 12* degree stem and I like the match of bars, stem and seatpost. This has to be the most beautiful bike I've ever seen in the flesh. Including Colnago C60 tricolores etc. There is something about all the colors coming together that makes it beautiful in my eyes. It rides pretty good too :).
https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...66&oe=59611A82 |
Originally Posted by noodle soup
(Post 19489576)
I'm just picking nits here.
Originally Posted by noodle soup
(Post 19489576)
I like the bike, but there are some things I would have done differently. The stem length/handler/frame size choice is one, but I understand your reasoning.
Disc brakes look strange to me on road bikes, but probably because I have no need for them. It rarely rains here. They look fine on the Disc Trucker I'm borrowing from a friend. I sorta like the tire choice, but prefer the darker color that Continental uses on their GP Classics. I'm curious how those darker sidewalls would look. But Continental doesn't make them in a tubular so for these wheels, I'll be sticking with the Vittorias. |
Originally Posted by noodle soup
(Post 19489710)
the levers are mounted a little lower than I would prefer.
|
Originally Posted by lsberrios1
(Post 19487456)
|
Originally Posted by lsberrios1
(Post 19487456)
This has to be the most beautiful bike I've ever seen in the flesh.
https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...66&oe=59611A82 |
Originally Posted by mpath
(Post 19491450)
Then you need to get out more. Check out [web] pages.
|
Originally Posted by mpath
(Post 19491450)
Then you need to get out more. :D Check out Two Hubs or Veloholic's Facebook pages.
|
Originally Posted by lsberrios1
(Post 19491524)
to be quite honest, this bike does not photograph well (or the photographer sucks). I have seen many beautiful bikes and I will have to say that to me, this is the best setup I've seen. it does not ride as good as others might but as far as looks it's great.
|
That Tarmac is hot as f. The paint job is unique and intricate without looking busy or gaudy and the setup is on point. If it were my bike, I'd ditch the gumwalls and swap out the cages for Tacx Devas, but it still looks great regardless.
|
Originally Posted by nycphotography
(Post 19491619)
What about it doesn't ride as well, and compared to what, and why?
It comes down to taste. I acknowledge that the build is top notch and not a single detail was spared but when it comes down to my flavor of bike, the TCR takes the edge in overall feel. I race the TCR so I push it to its limits more often, the Tarmac I ride on beautiful Sunny Sunday afternoons to go drink coffee 50 miles away from home. The TCR I beat up senseless. Does that make any sense? |
Originally Posted by goenrdoug
(Post 19491513)
oh, the irony.
|
Originally Posted by lsberrios1
(Post 19491524)
to be quite honest, this bike does not photograph well (or the photographer sucks). I have seen many beautiful bikes and I will have to say that to me, this is the best setup I've seen. it does not ride as good as others might but as far as looks it's great.
|
Originally Posted by lsberrios1
(Post 19491700)
That tarmac as pictured comes in at 13.8lbs. I think it might be too light for me @ 165lbs. The wheels are not as stiff as I would like them to be, they are only 1,190g for the pair.
Does that make any sense? what wheels and tires are on it? |
Originally Posted by nycphotography
(Post 19491822)
perfect sense.
what wheels and tires are on it? |
|
Originally Posted by ravenmore
(Post 19496662)
|
Complete (for now) Lynskey
2 Attachment(s)
Just threw the Novembers on it a couple days ago, yet to have time to ride (discovered mold mid remodel, been otherwise occupied...).
Lynskey R150 disc Enve road disc fork Enve carbon handlebar Thmoson Masterpiece post November Select+ Disc w/ White Industries CLD hubs blue, Kinlin XR31TS rims, tubeless Mostly 105 group with the 685 hydraulic shifter/brake combo Brooks C15 carved |
Originally Posted by joejack951
(Post 19486471)
|
Originally Posted by slowjamz
(Post 19496999)
this bike would look so sweet with a brown brooks c13 (don't think they make it) and some brown leather bartape.
|
Originally Posted by noodle soup
(Post 19496687)
the crankset looks good, now what about that computer mount?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:28 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.